the apologist strikes again
Coming from the guy that thinks that Romney's bullshit 12 million jobs claim isn't bullshit, this is awesome.
But anyway, if there are really only 325,000 "new jobs" created because that's the net when you subtract jobs lost, what do you call the other 4.9 million jobs that were created? Do they just not count or something?
i said that? cite.
obama's add was completely and purposefully misleading. you should know better and stop apologizing for your party leader's bogus ads.
I wasn't quoting you, hotshot. You got all pissy at a fact check about Romney's job claims, which, unlike Obama's new jobs claim, are lies.
There's nothing bogus about saying over 5 million new jobs during his term. Nothing at all. If you want to argue that net jobs is a better metric, you can. But that doesn't falsify a true statement about new jobs.
when did i get "pissy" about his 12 million job claims? how can a prediction about jobs be a lie when the future has not happened? did obama lie about his UE claim? my hunch is you won't call that a lie because obama is a democrat.
the ad is misleading, period. here is CNN's take:
Conclusion:
Many voters blame that initial weakness on the fractured economy Obama inherited from his Republican predecessor, former President George W. Bush. But in terms of sheer numbers, Obama's assertion that he created 5 million jobs does not tell the whole story and is therefore false.
http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/03/politics/fact-check-jobs-economy/index.html
even clinton news network isn't apologizing for obama's bogus claim. that is hilarious when you're farther left than CNN
It a lie when he claims that certain studies support the 12 million jobs figure and a look at those studies provides no support for the claim.
Over 5 million new jobs is an accurate statement. You never answered by question about the 4.9 million new jobs that apparently don't count. What do we call them? Are they not new jobs? DO they not count?
why are you defending his misleading ad? even CNN said it was false. since he did not give the full story, it didn't even pass CNN's fact checkers.
they studies did support romney, you just don't like them because they don't lean left.
i already talked with you about the studies. not rehashing them.
i answered you, you just don't like the answer.
lmao...an internet warrior's opinion vs. a study. your suspicions are nothing but hot air. you sound afraid nigel.