Transcript Truthers: Conservatives Deny Obama Called Libya Attack An "Act Of Terror"

TheRocketSurgeon said:
And that was not the point of contention.

MR. ROMNEY: Yeah, I — I certainly do. I certainly do. I — I think it’s interesting the president just said something which is that on the day after the attack, he went in the Rose Garden and said that this was an act of terror. You said in the Rose Garden the day after the attack it was an act of terror. It was not a spontaneous demonstration.
PRESIDENT OBAMA: Please proceed.
MR. ROMNEY: Is that what you’re saying?
PRESIDENT OBAMA: Please proceed, Governor.
MR. ROMNEY: I — I — I want to make sure we get that for the record, because it took the president 14 days before he called the attack in Benghazi an act of terror.
PRESIDENT OBAMA: Get the transcript.
MS. CROWLEY: It — he did in fact, sir.
So let me — let me call it an act of terrorism — (inaudible) —
PRESIDENT OBAMA: Can you say that a little louder, Candy? (Laughter, applause.)
MS. CROWLEY: He did call it an act of terror. It did as well take — it did as well take two weeks or so for the whole idea of there being a riot out there about this tape to come out. You are correct about that.

Click to expand...

I posted the very statement in his speech where he used the word "terror" and he DIDN'T CALL THE BENGHAZI ATTACK A TERRORIST ATTACK! So what Crowley said was a LIE! He did use the word "terror" but he didn't specify THIS ATTACK was a terrorist attack.
 
Furthermore... it is technically IMPOSSIBLE for this to be BOTH a "spontaneous uprising" and also a coordinated terrorist attack. It just can't be BOTH! It's one or the other! Obama categorized this as a spontaneous uprising because of a video, he DID NOT call it a terrorist attack... still hasn't, to my knowledge.
 
Dixie said:
Romney was right, even Crowley had to admit that.

Look... you're not going to get away with blaming the attacks on republicans. You are not going to get away with claiming Obama called them terrorist attacks. You can fluff up his generalized statement, you can prop up Crowley, you can keep suggesting that budget proposals which never were passed by Congress, led to the lack of security, but it's just not going to fly with the informed American public.

I think it's a GLARING example of this administration's incompetence and dishonesty. You wanted something to distract the voters from Obama's dismal economic record? Well, you got it bud!
Click to expand...

Admit??? He was right. There is nothing to admit. No gotcha, dumbass. It took them two weeks to get a good understanding of what had happened. So?

Why would I try to blame it on Republicans? Do you know something we don't? Are you worried there is something that will tie them to it?

Nobody said he called them "terrorist attacks" you fucking moron. Nobody cares either.

I wanted something to distract from Obama's dismal record? And what... you are it? Because, that is what you are doing.
 
Last edited:
Dixie said:
I posted the very statement in his speech where he used the word "terror" and he DIDN'T CALL THE BENGHAZI ATTACK A TERRORIST ATTACK! So what Crowley said was a LIE! He did use the word "terror" but he didn't specify THIS ATTACK was a terrorist attack.
Click to expand...

OMFG! She did not say he called it a "terrorist attack." She said...

MS. CROWLEY: He did call it an act of terror.

WTF is wrong with you? I doubt she sees a big difference in the two, because she did not seem insane!
 
TheRocketSurgeon said:
Admit??? He was right. There is nothing to admit. No gotcha, dumbass. It took them two weeks to get a good understanding of what had happened. So?

Why would I try to blame it on Republicans? Do you know something we don't? Are you worried there is something that will tie them to it?

Nobody said he called them "terrorist attacks" you fucking moron. Nobody cares either.

I wanted something to distract from Obama's dismal record? And what... you are it? Becasue, that is what you are doing.
Click to expand...

Well fine! If it took them two weeks and they didn't know this was a planned alQaeda attack, just tell us that! Don't go run to one use of the word "terror" in his speech and try to claim he called it a terrorist attack, because that's just not what fucking happened! He DIDN'T call it a terrorist attack! Maybe he didn't know? That's fine, but don't fucking LIE about it!
 
TheRocketSurgeon said:
OMFG! She did not say he called it a "terrorist attack." She said...

MS. CROWLEY: He did call it an act of terror.

WTF is wrong with you? I doubt she sees a big difference in the two, because she did not seem insane!
Click to expand...

HE DIDN'T CALL IT AN ACT OF TERROR!

"No acts of terror will shake our resolve..."

There is not one single solitary thing about that statement that tells me the attack in Libya was a terrorist attack OR act of terror!
 
Last edited:
Dixie said:
Well fine! If it took them two weeks and they didn't know this was a planned alQaeda attack, just tell us that! Don't go run to one use of the word "terror" in his speech and try to claim he called it a terrorist attack, because that's just not what fucking happened! He DIDN'T call it a terrorist attack! Maybe he didn't know? That's fine, but don't fucking LIE about it!
Click to expand...

Nobody was lying. He said act of terror. No one said he said anything else. Romney got hung up on it because he probably heard you dummies talking about how he never said it was a terrorist attack and he thought he had a gotch. But "acts of terror" vs "terrorist attack" is NOT a big difference to most SANE people. That Romney thought it was signifcant made him look really bad.
 
Transcript Truthers: Conservatives Deny Obama Called Libya Attack An "Act Of Terror"

TheRocketSurgeon said:
Nobody was lying. He said act of terror. No one said he said anything else. Romney got hung up on it because he probably heard you dummies talking about how he never said it was a terrorist attack and he thought he had a gotch. But "acts of terror" vs "terrorist attack" is NOT a big difference to most SANE people. That Romney thought it was signifcant made him look really bad.
Click to expand...

Do you think it will matter that he said "....it is not optimal"
 
OBAMA: "No acts of terror will shake our resolve..."
Click to expand...

No acts of bravery will go unnoticed.
No challenge is too big!
No man is too wise!

These are platitude statements that are base generalizations. They lack any specificity whatsoever, and nothing specific is defined by them.

Obama never called the attack in Benghazi "an act of terror" and the remainder of his speech indicates he didn't believe it was an act of terror, because he chastises those who "seek to denigrate another religion." As I pointed out before, it can't be both a spontaneous uprising because of a video, and ALSO a terrorist attack! It is impossible to believe that Obama intended to mean BOTH!
 
when will you people EVER be honest?


lies about apologising to the terrorists and then you lie about him not calling it a terror attack.



You people are dispicable.


You have NO morals left.

You just fucking lie and then lie and then lie until your fucking lies run up against each other and then you lie about your lies.



You live on a steady diet of lies and denials of your lies.



Facts are facts and the tape shows Obama talking about an attack aimed at causing terror will not ever stop this country.


That means he called it an act of terror.


parse away and ignore that.


Lie away and say an embassy release trying to ward off a terror attack was an example of Obama apologising to the terrorists.


You fucking meatsacks need to find something to have an emotional response to besides lies and tax cuts
 
Desh... It is IMPOSSIBLE that Obama called it an act of terror and ALSO called it a spontaneous uprising caused by a video. Even if we want to cling to his use of the word "terror" in a speech, we have to willfully suspend disbelief to get there. He can't have said it was an act of terror, meaning a terrorist attack by a terror organization, and at the very same time in the very same speech, blame it on a spontaneous uprising.

His words do not specifically state the attacks were acts of terror. Nothing in his speech indicates he believed this was an act of terror. And since his administration ran around for 2 weeks, telling everyone this was NOT a terrorist attack and WAS a spontaneous uprising because of a video, that's what we have to believe the president believed when he gave his speech.
 
acts of terror are not always planned months in advance.


YOU people jsut love to lie about anything and everything the president says.

You place party over country and reality
 
Your a fucking liar Dixie.

you have proven it over and over and over here.

Its getting to the point where there is no choice but to call you people what you are.


You lie and lie and lie and lie and lie.


You have NO remorse for it no matter how obvious your lies are.


What kind of human being would do that?


a mentally ill human being.


Your an insane liar.



No amount of tip toeing arround this fact can be useful to any decent human being anymore.

Your a fucking insane liar.


Meatsack covers it pretty well.

But even that is a niceity when dealing with you sociopaths who inhabit the shambles you have made of a once proud party
 
evince said:
acts of terror are not always planned months in advance.


YOU people jsut love to lie about anything and everything the president says.

You place party over country and reality
Click to expand...

Now you are going to take "acts of terror" back and claim it meant something besides a terrorist attack. Romney called out Obama for not calling it a terrorist attack, and he was correct. Obama didn't call it a terrorist attack, and he didn't specify it was an act of terror, either. He and his administration INSISTED it was a spontaneous uprising, prompted by an offensive video. He chastised the people who made the video, and for the next couple of weeks, his administration clung to the story this was about a video.

Now that he has been called out, and Candy had to do her maya culpa, you are all trying your best to spin this to Obama's favor, but the record speaks for itself. Maybe you can convince enough idiots like Yurt who just aren't paying attention to things? Is that the plan here? Because MOST of us KNOW Obama didn't call this a terror attack.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
????....what he did NOT say was "this was an act of terrorism"........he did say was "Since our founding, the United States has been a nation that respects all faiths. We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. But there is absolutely no justification to this type of senseless violence. None. The world must stand together to unequivocally reject these brutal acts."......

seems pretty obvious he was calling it senseless violence in response to denigration of religious beliefs......but maybe I just look at it that way because I'm sensible and logical.....
Click to expand...



But he did apologise to the terrorist huh?


but you say he didnt say they did it?


gee are you confused
 
Dixie said:
Now you are going to take "acts of terror" back and claim it meant something besides a terrorist attack. Romney called out Obama for not calling it a terrorist attack, and he was correct. Obama didn't call it a terrorist attack, and he didn't specify it was an act of terror, either. He and his administration INSISTED it was a spontaneous uprising, prompted by an offensive video. He chastised the people who made the video, and for the next couple of weeks, his administration clung to the story this was about a video.

Now that he has been called out, and Candy had to do her maya culpa, you are all trying your best to spin this to Obama's favor, but the record speaks for itself. Maybe you can convince enough idiots like Yurt who just aren't paying attention to things? Is that the plan here? Because MOST of us KNOW Obama didn't call this a terror attack.
Click to expand...




he said an act of terror would not stop our country.


It was an attack


He called it a act of terror.


You guys just LIE about fucking everything.

just like when he clearly said a busness owner did not build the roads.

and then you claimed non stop and even named your damned convention after a LIE about what obama said.

LIE LIE LIE LIE LIE


Its all you fucking guiltfree lying sociopaths do anymore.


dicksee your a fucking heartless lying meatsack
 
Dixie said:
Romney was right, even Crowley had to admit that.

Look... you're not going to get away with blaming the attacks on republicans. You are not going to get away with claiming Obama called them terrorist attacks. You can fluff up his generalized statement, you can prop up Crowley, you can keep suggesting that budget proposals which never were passed by Congress, led to the lack of security, but it's just not going to fly with the informed American public.

I think it's a GLARING example of this administration's incompetence and dishonesty. You wanted something to distract the voters from Obama's dismal economic record? Well, you got it bud!
Click to expand...

Bottom line: what difference does it make? And I mean that sincerely so please spare me any name-calling or other snide diversion.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top