Right-Wing Media Falsely Claim Candy Crowley Walked Back Her Fact Check Of Romney

Bijou said:
Because denying it is politically beneficial. Haven't you been paying attention?
Click to expand...

Ah... so THAT is why you are all running around trying to claim "acts of terror" means the same thing as "terrorist attack/"

We were ALL here for this, none of us were hiding under a rock for two weeks, while the Administration REFUSED to label this incident a terrorist attack, and insisted it was a spontaneous protest over a YouTube video. Obama and you are now trying to hide behind a "meaning of is" explanation, and that's fine... but let's all grow the fuck up and be honest about that!
 
Dixie said:
Ah... so THAT is why you are all running around trying to claim "acts of terror" means the same thing as "terrorist attack/"

We were ALL here for this, none of us were hiding under a rock for two weeks, while the Administration REFUSED to label this incident a terrorist attack, and insisted it was a spontaneous protest over a YouTube video. Obama and you are now trying to hide behind a "meaning of is" explanation, and that's fine... but let's all grow the fuck up and be honest about that!
Click to expand...

:rofl2:

You, talking about honesty and 'growing up'.

Best joke I've heard all day!

:rofl2:
 
Dixie said:
Ah... so THAT is why you are all running around trying to claim "acts of terror" means the same thing as "terrorist attack/"

We were ALL here for this, none of us were hiding under a rock for two weeks, while the Administration REFUSED to label this incident a terrorist attack, and insisted it was a spontaneous protest over a YouTube video. Obama and you are now trying to hide behind a "meaning of is" explanation, and that's fine... but let's all grow the fuck up and be honest about that!
Click to expand...

Oh, brother...
 
Dixie said:
Are you really that stupid? Think about it for a hot second.

The shooting in Aurora was an act of terror, it wasn't a terrorist attack.
Click to expand...

he wasn't referring to aurora. further, act of terror is synonymous with acts of terrorism. nobody referred to aurora as an act of terror. it was mass murder. words have meaning dixie and you can't just make up definitions as you go along.

this is really bad apologism on your part.
 
cannabis said:
he wasn't referring to aurora. further, act of terror is synonymous with acts of terrorism. nobody referred to aurora as an act of terror. it was mass murder. words have meaning dixie and you can't just make up definitions as you go along.

this is really bad apologism on your part.
Click to expand...

I didn't say he was referring to Aurora, I gave an example like you requested. Regardless of how you parse it, the shooting in Aurora was an "act of terror" by any fucking definition of the term. It was NOT a "terrorist attack" which denotes an attack specifically planned and orchestrated by a terrorist organization. These are two different things altogether. Unless, of course, you are some kind of retarded myopic fuckwit or liberal.
 
Dixie said:
I didn't say he was referring to Aurora, I gave an example like you requested. Regardless of how you parse it, the shooting in Aurora was an "act of terror" by any fucking definition of the term. It was NOT a "terrorist attack" which denotes an attack specifically planned and orchestrated by a terrorist organization. These are two different things altogether. Unless, of course, you are some kind of retarded myopic fuckwit or liberal.
Click to expand...

right....acts of terror do not refer to terrorism

fucking idiot
 
Dixie said:
Ah... so THAT is why you are all running around trying to claim "acts of terror" means the same thing as "terrorist attack/"

We were ALL here for this, none of us were hiding under a rock for two weeks, while the Administration REFUSED to label this incident a terrorist attack, and insisted it was a spontaneous protest over a YouTube video. Obama and you are now trying to hide behind a "meaning of is" explanation, and that's fine... but let's all grow the fuck up and be honest about that!
Click to expand...

4251-full-retard.jpg
 
Let's also be perfectly clear, White House spokesman Jay Carney was asked repeatedly for days about this, and refused to acknowledge it was a terrorist attack. He maintained it was a "spontaneous protest caused by a video" and NOT a terrorist attack! It was two weeks, and after the initial story fell apart, the State Department finally said it was a terrorist attack. THAT is what Romney pointed out, and THAT is what you and your liberal friends are running away from at this time.
 
Dixie said:
Let's also be perfectly clear, White House spokesman Jay Carney was asked repeatedly for days about this, and refused to acknowledge it was a terrorist attack. He maintained it was a "spontaneous protest caused by a video" and NOT a terrorist attack! It was two weeks, and after the initial story fell apart, the State Department finally said it was a terrorist attack. THAT is what Romney pointed out, and THAT is what you and your liberal friends are running away from at this time.
Click to expand...

backpedal.gif
 
Dixie said:
Let's also be perfectly clear, White House spokesman Jay Carney was asked repeatedly for days about this, and refused to acknowledge it was a terrorist attack. He maintained it was a "spontaneous protest caused by a video" and NOT a terrorist attack! It was two weeks, and after the initial story fell apart, the State Department finally said it was a terrorist attack. THAT is what Romney pointed out, and THAT is what you and your liberal friends are running away from at this time.
Click to expand...

The man who lives in the WH called it a terrorist attack the next day.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top