Housing starts jump to fastest pace in 4 years

[SmarterthanYou]

please explain this one away

I did already.

"In a bid to help the economy by encouraging people to buy homes, the Fed said last month it would buy $40 billion in mortgage-backed securities every month until the jobs outlook improves substantially. "

40 billion a month in mortgage backed securities. why wouldn't financial institutions throw out money to people who can't afford it as long as it's backed by the fed? we call this 'building a bubble', maybe you've heard of it?

 

[cawacko]

Deah, you've made it pretty clear that you can't actually respond to SF's post.

 

[Phantasmal]

When Desh posts seven times within a half hour that people are sociopaths that don't respond to her thread and hate the country it is going to get mocked when she doesn't respond immediately.

Oh, it is sweet you come to his defense! It was the same way the day SF got all pissy about someone saying the same thing to him. I didn't realize there was a time frame in which one needed to respond, maybe, you should post the rule so we can all fall in line.

 

[evince]

I did already.

"In a bid to help the economy by encouraging people to buy homes, the Fed said last month it would buy $40 billion in mortgage-backed securities every month until the jobs outlook improves substantially. "

40 billion a month in mortgage backed securities. why wouldn't financial institutions throw out money to people who can't afford it as long as it's backed by the fed? we call this 'building a bubble', maybe you've heard of it?

dear idiot, the laws have changed and we wont now get another bubble like the republicans lack of regulations caused

 

[evince]

Dear Desh...

You have ranted and raged all over this thread... a thread you started a couple hours ago. You pretend we are all 'ignoring this'... given your propensity to lie and distort, it shouldn't shock you that some just either ignore your threads or don't rush right away to look at them.

Housing starts is a decent indicator, but it is also highly volatile. So while this is indeed a good report for starts, it is not the super duper news you proclaim it to be. Especially when you link to an article stating it is the 'fastest in the last four years'. Given the slow pace of growth in the economy over the last four years you are not really comparing it to much. Again, this is a good number. If it sustains the adjustments at or near this level, that is a healthy sign.

Now, do go back to your ranting and raving about how people are just flat out ignoring your tantrum thread.

nearly two hours to come up with that wimpy retort?

 

[SmarterthanYou]

dear idiot, the laws have changed and we wont now get another bubble like the republicans lack of regulations caused

I'd LOVE for you to cite these new laws, please. provide for us the proof that we'll never have another housing bubble again.

 

[cawacko]

dear idiot, the laws have changed and we wont now get another bubble like the republicans lack of regulations caused

This might be one of the best answers I've ever heard. "we will not get another bubble"

What regulations are now in place that will cause us to never have another housing bubble?

 

[cawacko]

nearly two hours to come up with that wimpy retort?

So you can't actually respond to him can you?

 

[SmarterthanYou]

I'm not seeing any legal cites that prevent future housing bubbles yet. are you looking for them?

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

You party is the party of sociopaths .

its the truth and like all truths it deseves repeting

You are a sociopath

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

Evince, you call them this line = sociopath

SF, you call them this line = left wing nut (lemmings)

Do you understand now or is it still over your head?

I am guessing you are still missing the sarcasm of my post?

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

Why can't you respond to SF's post? He gave a reasonable response. If you disagree with it why don't you state why you do?

She did respond... she once again called me a sociopath and told me to fuck off... or some such highly intellectual response

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

ah the pee wee defense.
tell me emotionless factless bag of meat, how long do you think you can depend on that middleschool tactic?

You are truly missing the irony... the above... more irony

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

Under which partys control did this mess get created?

Depends... control of the WH... Democrats
control of Congress... Republicans.

Next question?

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

Oh, it is sweet you come to his defense! It was the same way the day SF got all pissy about someone saying the same thing to him. I didn't realize there was a time frame in which one needed to respond, maybe, you should post the rule so we can all fall in line.

It is even sweeter that you come on and defend Desh during her total meltdown.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

dear idiot, the laws have changed and we wont now get another bubble like the republicans lack of regulations caused

tell us Desh... what has changed? What new rule is going to prevent another housing bubble?

What lack of regulation by the Reps are you referring to?

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

Desh has clearly run away again... can't answer a few simple questions Desh?

Apparently desh is content to simply come on here, lie her ass off and then leave.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

i see SF has become the evince of the right with his manic posts after posts

 

[Phantasmal]

SF, did you send in your comments?

http://www.consumerfinance.gov/pres...ng-greater-accountability-to-mortgage-market/

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

SF, did you send in your comments?

http://www.consumerfinance.gov/pres...ng-greater-accountability-to-mortgage-market/

I lobby Udall and Bennett consistently on issues... and yes, I have sent in comments on the mortgage industry.

It is truly sweet of you to try and help the deranged sociopath Desh out like this. But the above does not limit the potential for a housing bubble.

They are deliberately keeping rates lower than what the market would have them be. What happens when they stop? Where do interest rates go from there?