Has the right resorted to their usual argument?

[Guns Guns Guns]

Jason Payseno of EAP Glass Service replaces a window shot out at the Obama for America





​

Shot fired at Obama campaign field office in Denver - The Denver Post http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_2...ma-campaign-headquarters-denver#ixzz298ix64gG

 

[Haiku]

Yeah, not much has changed.

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

Yeah, not much has changed.

They talk a lot, but lack the skills and fortitude to do much more than make threats and break glass...just listen to this blatherskite.

 

[RockX]

What self respecting Republican would do this: "It looks like it was one shot that was fired into the structure."

Sounds more like one of those OWS protesters that is unhappy with Obama.

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

What self respecting Republican would do this: "It looks like it was one shot that was fired into the structure." Sounds more like one of those OWS protesters that is unhappy with Obama.

So you would fire more shots and target people.

 

[RockX]

So you would fire more shots and target people.

LOL

This is typical of your kind, break a few windows and blame it on us. When in reality it is one of your own doing the damage, it has happened before in Denver.

http://www.denverpost.com/ci_13203950

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

LOL This is typical of your kind, break a few windows and blame it on us. When in reality it is one of your own doing the damage, it has happened before in Denver. http://www.denverpost.com/ci_13203950

So you would fire more shots and target people.

 

[Damocles]

So you would fire more shots and target people.

Did he say that? And did he disturb you with a past of false "attacks" in Denver that make people almost immediately question the story?

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

Did he say that? And did he disturb you with a past of false "attacks" in Denver that make people almost immediately question the story?

Since he's "a self-respecting Republican", he's implying he could have done better, isn't he?

And was there more than one "false" attack that made you "immediately question the story"...which I note you didn't seem to do until this morning, for some reason.

What self respecting Republican would do this: "It looks like it was one shot that was fired into the structure."

I noticed that you failed to question your ideological ally about his unsubstantiated claim, BTW.

Sounds more like one of those OWS protesters that is unhappy with Obama.

 

[Damocles]

Since he's "a self-respecting Republican", he's implying he could have done better, isn't he?

Is he?

And was there more than one "false" attack that made you "immediately question the story"...which I note you didn't seem to do until this morning, for some reason.

I wait for information before I make a judgment. It may have been something entirely different. Do you wait for information or do you immediately jump to a conclusion? A bit like shooting before you aim, like the Administration?

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

Is he?

What make you suspect he doesn't respect himself?

I wait for information before I make a judgment.

I'll try to remember that. Thanks for clarifying. At first I thought it was possible that you didn't know about the earlier incident until your comrade posted the link.

It may have been something entirely different.

It may? Like what?

Do you wait for information or do you immediately jump to a conclusion?

I confess that I didn't know about the 2008 shooting until your good friend informed me. Do you have any reason to think this was another self-inflicted shooting?

A bit like shooting before you aim, like the Administration?

Interesting. Explain how "the Administration immediately jump(ed) to a conclusion"?

 

[Damocles]

What make you suspect he doesn't respect himself?

What makes you suspect that he was inferring anything like that?

I'll try to remember that. Thanks for clarifying. At first I thought it was possible that you didn't know about the earlier incident until your comrade posted the link.

Thank you.

It may? Like what?

I wait for information.

I confess that I didn't know about the 2008 shooting until your good friend informed me. Do you have any reason to think this was another self-inflicted shooting?

I have no information to think it isn't or is... Do you?

Interesting. Explain how "the Administration immediately jump(ed) to a conclusion"?

Can you explain how I can see it in some other fashion after finding out their original assertions were factually incorrect?

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

What makes you suspect that he was inferring anything like that?

This made me think your bosom pal was a self-respecting Republican implying he'd have done a better job:

What self respecting Republican would do this: "It looks like it was one shot that was fired into the structure." Sounds more like one of those OWS protesters that is unhappy with Obama.

Thank you.

You're welcome.

I wait for information.

Awesome.

Does that mean you can immediately back up all your arguments with irrefutable facts?

I have no information to think it isn't or is...

So naturally, you'll ask RacistX to substantiate the claim he made because your so fair and even-handed and stuffs.

Do you?

I'm waiting for facts.

Can you explain how I can see it in some other fashion after finding out their original assertions were factually incorrect?

What "assertions" did "the Administration" make?

 

[christiefan915]

LOL

This is typical of your kind, break a few windows and blame it on us. When in reality it is one of your own doing the damage, it has happened before in Denver.

http://www.denverpost.com/ci_13203950

Two words: Ashley Todd.

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

Two words: Ashley Todd.

I wait for information.

 

[christiefan915]

I wait for information.

Just making fun of web for thinking Obama supporters would vandalize his campaign office and blame it on repubs.

"A McCain campaign volunteer made up a story of being robbed, pinned to the ground and having the letter "B" scratched on her face in what she had said was a politically inspired attack, police said Friday.


Ashley Todd, 20-year-old college student from College Station, Texas, admitted Friday that the story was false, said Maurita Bryant, the assistant chief of the police department's investigations division. Todd was charged with making a false report to police, and Bryant said police doubted her story from the start."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/24/mccain-supporter-who-clai_n_137484.html

 

[Damocles]

This made me think your bosom pal was a self-respecting Republican implying he'd have done a better job:

So, you don't have anything then? And what makes you think he's a pal? I generally do not respond to people I think are solely trolls, I think engaging them just adds to the prole drama, don't you?

Does that mean you can immediately back up all your arguments with irrefutable facts?

It could mean that I wait for facts, don't you think?

So naturally, you'll ask RacistX to substantiate the claim he made because your so fair and even-handed and stuffs.

Or I could just resort to the general policy of not engaging people I think are trolls, don't you think?

I'm waiting for facts.

It doesn't seem like you are, can you show me where you didn't jump to a conclusion?

What "assertions" did "the Administration" make?

About Benghazi? They asserted that the attacks stemmed from protests that didn't exist and had nothing to do with it, are you incapable of any memory?

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

So, you don't have anything then?

If I "don't have anything", why are you neglecting your hives to address my points?

And what makes you think he's a pal? I generally do not respond to people I think are solely trolls, I think engaging them just adds to the prole drama, don't you?

So you didn't take up the cudgel on his behalf in this thread?

It could mean that I wait for facts, don't you think?

Or not.

Or I could just resort to the general policy of not engaging people I think are trolls, don't you think?

Or not.

It doesn't seem like you are, can you show me where you didn't jump to a conclusion?

Prove a negative?

About Benghazi? They asserted that the attacks stemmed from protests that didn't exist and had nothing to do with it, are you incapable of any memory?

So there were no protests?

 

[Damocles]

If I "don't have anything", why are you neglecting your hives to address my points?

I'm just asking questions, why are you afraid to answer them?

So you didn't take up the cudgel on his behalf in this thread?

What I didn't do was engage him in conversation, did you?

Prove a negative?

To me your pretext is obvious in this thread, isn't it to you?

So there were no protests?

So, you are going to try to pretend that the testimony before Congress stating that the streets were quiet and that they never told the WH that there were protests due to any movie in Libya at all simply doesn't exist?

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

I'm just asking questions, why are you afraid to answer them?

Did I say I was afraid?

What I didn't do was engage him in conversation, did you?

Do you often ask questions you know the answers to?

What you didn't do was apply the same standards to his assertion that you do to others.

If I didn't have your word that this isn't the case, I might suspect that you favor his "arguments".

To me your pretext is obvious in this thread, isn't it to you?

Spell it out for me.

So, you are going to try to pretend that the testimony before Congress stating that the streets were quiet and that they never told the WH that there were protests due to any movie in Libya at all simply doesn't exist?

Are you going to say there were no protests related to the Christian hate video in Libya at all?

Because that's not what this reports says:

http://abcnews.go.com/International...tment-official/story?id=17438780#.UHmds9kiTqJ