canceled.2021.1
#AMERICAISDEAD
What did Obama know about Benghazi and when did he know it?
The most natural question is this
- Thread starter canceled.2021.1
- Start date
Liberty
Libertarian Minded
Obama's to into loving muslims to see anything other than what he wants. I think it's funny how so many women love him, and yet if they only knew what kind of life he would have them live if he got the chance.
hazlnut
Verified User
I suppose that's a 'natural' question....
For this gal:
The rest of us will toss some change in your cup and move on...
Wow, perpetual purposeful ignorance is a great elixir for the kool-ade...
Let's see how this works. Nixon tries to protect a few idiots who break into a building, "What did he know, when?!" is the cry, he later resigns, the coverup was worse than the crime. Now: Americans die on American soil due to a terrorist attack that the Administration tried to pass off to a frickin' movie trailer even though the State Dept. has made it clear that they never believed that it was the movie trailer (I'm sure people here will remember I told you that it had nothing to do with the stupid movie). The President finds out people are dying in Benghazi, goes off to bed to wake up in the morning and talk about movie trailers...
They continued talking about movie trailers, including in a speech at the UN... Then seek out and "find" some reason to arrest the dude who "created" the movie trailer with nary a word about his free speech from the press reporting on it, nor from the "liberals" who supposedly care about his rights, and even now try to pretend that they really thought it was due to the trailer in front of Congress...
And asking "When did he know it wasn't due to a frickin' movie trailer?" isn't an appropriate question.
I can't believe how proud of totally and purposefully ignorant people can be. Yeah, this might hurt his election chances, especially if we find out his long winter's nap wasn't even interrupted by the fact he knew it was a terrorist attack that he would blame on somebody's first amendment speech....
Maybe it should.
The life his wife has, a happy one, where she is free to make her own choices. I support realistic criticism of Obama, this claiming he is against women's rights is ridiculous.
Last edited:
zappasguitar
Well-known member
Their desperation continues to grow and the arguments will only increase in frequency and shrillness until November finally gets here..
There has actually been some pretty good reporting on this issue. You should maybe read it.
Also, too, I love the Watergate comparison. Hilarious. I'm not sure what is more hilarious, though, the fact that you are comparing Watergate to this incident or your description of Watergate as Nixon trying to "protect a few idiots trying to break into a building." Lolers.
Liberty
Libertarian Minded
Just remember, I'm not a republican. I hate both Romney and Obama.
That being said, he tends to favor muslims a lot. This should be an issue for people who love liberty.
Liberty
Libertarian Minded
I too am looking for November to get here. This has been one nasty election.
Tell, me. Who died when they broke into the Watergate hotel room? And how would you describe it? People broke in, Nixon tried to cover it up.
Can you count how many died that night in Benghazi? I'll bet you can. And it is infinitely more than died due to Watergate...
Basically, I'm pointing out that it matters when people knew things, and it matters more when people's lives are on the line. Also that I am a bit surprised at how much people just "don't care" that they were misdirected by the Administration.
The comparison is so asinine on so many levels that it's really difficult to pick where to start. Get real, Damo.
You are assuming a conclusion and then saying that you are surprised that people that don't share your conclusion aren't upset about the conclusion that you've drawn and that they haven't.
No, I am pointing out what somebody said, in this thread. That the QUESTION itself was something bad. Do you understand that my point is about the question, not about what we'll find out once it is answered, or are you assuming a conclusion for me then pretending that I shouldn't be surprised that people wish to purposefully remain ignorant?
Do you think you can make me suddenly afraid to speak if you mock something I haven't said? Seriously, I've asked this more and more often in the past year, What happened to you? At one point you used to be able to actually present an argument. Now all you have is this sad BS.
zappasguitar
Well-known member
Everybody take a step back...Damo appears to be preparing for another trip south of the border to hyperbolivia!
Actually, your feeble attempt to connect the two events was cause for a good chuckle...however...you did leave out something in your description of Watergate:
Nixon orchestrates break in...
THEN people break in...
AND THEN Nixon tries to cover it up.
You aren't really going to try and claim Obama orchestrated the attacks, are you?
Because unless that's where you are going with this Watergate comparison, there IS NO COMPARISON between the two...
Basically, you were just trying to find another way to fling some more muck at Obama as the election draws near.
Insane wingnuts....running helter skelter, here and there screaming nonsense with their hair on fire. Our country is in serious trouble and you see the reason why right here...no reality can intrude on such closed, propagandized minds that are on display on the right. No reality can pierce the right wing bubble. Sad really.
Another sad attempt at substituting an ad hom attack for an argument.
It wasn't a comparison, both of you are flat wrong about that, it was simply remembering when that question was taken seriously as compared to the attempt to dismiss it from importance through misplaced mockery.
That question was asked before, and for something a bit less important than people getting killed.
Says the person who thinks asking questions is supposedly "crazy" and believes that as long as the government says so, we should just shut up... Well, at least so long as a Democrat says so.
Lol defending Nixon and Calvin Coolidge... Lol! too much
Link us up to somebody who defended Nixon. I'd like to see that.
(1) The description of Watergate is laughable.
(2) There is a bit of a difference between a President and his people actively committing crimes and then covering up their involvement in criminal acts and what happened in Benghazi.
(3) You're assuming misdirection and cover-up by the Administration as opposed to the Administration giving a truthful assessment based on the information available to it and updating it over time as additional information is learned.
(4) Spare me the "what happened to you" nonsense, Damo. The mote in thy brother's eye and all.
Again, then describe it yourself. What happened? Some dudes broke in, Nixon tried to cover it up.
Well, that depends on what he knew and when. Hence the reality, the question is valid. Many questions are valid, but this one is certainly one of them.
Mostly because reports tell me that the Intel that this was a "protest that escalated into spontaneous violence" was never there, it was unsupported by the facts that we currently know that they knew... Thus misdirection.
Why should I "spare you"? This is the best post I've gotten from you in many moons, and I'd really like to know what happened? Did you just get lazy and think that all that backslapping after a quick ad hom meant it was a really good argument?