No, because I didn't "demand" anything. I merely made the observation that many Atheists DO believe in something, even though they claim they don't, and you have pretty much confirmed this. But instead of admitting I made a valid point, you've decided to morph and twist my words into something that wasn't said, and bash me for it. THAT is a tantrum.
You are now trying to argue that Atheists DO believe in something greater than self, it's just not a "theistic" concept of God... well guess what? I believe basically that same thing. I am NOT an Atheist. I am a spiritualist who believes very much in God, or the concept of God, just not the "theistic" concepts promoted by organized religions. Is that what you believe as an Atheist, or not? Do you simply reject the Christian interpretations of God? If so, you are not a Christian, but it doesn't mean you are truly an Atheist.
Yes, I did present facts. FACT: 95% of the human race believes in something greater than self, and 5% of the human race are Nihilists. FACT: Many Atheists are bigger believers in God than some Christians, they deny and reject God as a means of 'punishing' God, because they don't know of any other way to do that. Your being offended by the label of Nihilist also seems to confirm what I said, but again, you can't admit that I made a valid point because you are a petulant little twit.
I did not argue that a foot can't be divided into 3 equal 4" pieces. I didn't argue that ANYTHING couldn't be divided into thirds. The ONLY claim I made, was that the number 1 can't be divided by the number 3 without producing a remainder, and for as long as there is a universe of reality surrounding us, that will be the case. You've not refuted this, and you can't refute it, but again... instead of acknowledging I made a valid point, you have to twist and morph my words into something you can refute. It's a real problem you have and should deal with.
Nonsense. I've not made an error, you've not pointed an error out, and you can't unless you twist my words. Your concept of "abstract thought" is what I like to call ignorant rejection of common sense for the sake of trying to appear intellectual. If you're pea-brain is going to fathom an "abstract thought" it should at the very least, be able to support it with something, and not depend on rearranging my words to demean me personally, especially about totally unrelated things.