Judge Upholds Healthcare Law

And even more astonishing is they provide their own and don't demand taxpayers pay for it.....the wonder.

You are so stupid, it makes me embarrassed for you. Woman pay for their insurance, they just wnt their birth control covered and you have been told this and you still repeat the lie. It is pathetic!
 
I'm not like you. I'm not a national socialist.

Thats doesn't change the reality of the conclusion....and I'm about as for from being socialist as a person can get....don't understand where you got that
ridiculous idea from....
 
You are so stupid, it makes me embarrassed for you. Woman pay for their insurance, they just wnt their birth control covered and you have been told this and you still repeat the lie. It is pathetic!

No problem with that at all.....you pay for it, you should get what you want.....you get it as a benefit of employment, you get what you get...or go elsewhere.
 
Most don't understand it, most unfortunate. The more policies that kick in, the more people like it. Yesterday the policy that if a patient is re admitted to the hospital within 30 days, the hospital gets fined. I think this will improve care and follow up care and save millions!

Oh, I definitely agree. It's just better all the way around.
 
I listen to my daughter, not the news on the Affordable Healthcare Act, she is one of the few people I know who has read the entire thing. She knows her stuff, and she deals with the elderly and Medicare, and she says the follow up care has already improved! She also says this will improve all care at hospitals and lower costs to the tax payers!

You obviously know little about infections and hospital care.

With a daughter and son-in-law being medical doctors, my golf friend MD, and numerous others in the medical field, I beg to differ....
 
Thats doesn't change the reality of the conclusion....and I'm about as for from being socialist as a person can get....don't understand where you got that
ridiculous idea from....

Romney will win Texas no matter who I vote for. So I want throw away my vote.

So this helping Obama win by voting for the one person that supports our constitution (Johnson), and me, is a lie.
 
They can get birth control without Obamacare.

I still think Obama's losing voters. We'll no in a little over a month from now.
Birth control saves money, they will get it and it will be included in their insurance coverage as it should be. It's healthcare regardless of your opinions of women.
 
Birth control saves money, they will get it and it will be included in their insurance coverage as it should be. It's healthcare regardless of your opinions of women.

I hope you can get reimbursed for you prophylactics or spermicide or whatever....that must be healthcare too....

Come to think of it....smoking saves money too....on Social Security....so start 'em young.
 
Keep your stinky ass dipped remarks like this one to yourself. Where do you get this stuff....oh yeah.

It's a question. I see you won't answer it. It's in the healthcare law. So I guess you're OK with it. Right?
 
Romney will win Texas no matter who I vote for. So I want throw away my vote.

So this helping Obama win by voting for the one person that supports our constitution (Johnson), and me, is a lie.

It will help re-elect the one person that openly does not support our Constitution......so take care and think it through.
 
With a daughter and son-in-law being medical doctors, my golf friend MD, and numerous others in the medical field, I beg to differ....

They are probably doctors that don't take Medicare, so what exactly are their complaints since you have discussed this with them?
 
Last edited:
I listen to my daughter, not the news on the Affordable Healthcare Act, she is one of the few people I know who has read the entire thing. She knows her stuff, and she deals with the elderly and Medicare, and she says the follow up care has already improved! She also says this will improve all care at hospitals and lower costs to the tax payers!

You obviously know little about infections and hospital care.

Well you know... as long as insurance pays for his Viagra, he doesn't care about anyone else.
 
If it is Tylenol with codeine, than it is fine.

It's not over the counter Tylenol.

Alvarez Invents Notion That Health Care Reform Provision Means Tylenol "Has To Go Behind The Counter" At Pharmacies.
Alvarez claimed that a provision in the health care reform bill that bars the use of medical spending account money on non-prescription medications means that "if you want to deduct a bottle of Tylenol, if you want to deduct a bottle -- diapers, if you want to deduct anything like that through your flexible account, you have to go to a physician, and of course, this is now madness. ... Not only labels, it has to go behind the counter. So you have to go to the pharmacist and say, 'Here's my prescription for Tylenol,' and he has to have it behind the counter and then he gives it to you." [Fox News, America's Newsroom, 3/9/11, via Media Matters]
  • Health Care Law Does Not Require Prescriptions For Over-The-Counter Drugs. The provision in question redefines medical expenses for spending accounts in order to conform with federal tax law. The affected accounts cover approximately 10 million Americans, roughly 3.2 percent of the U.S. population. [FactCheck.org, 9/3/10]
http://mediamatters.org/research/20...news-physicians-are-a-prescrip/181962#alvarez
 
No problem with that at all.....you pay for it, you should get what you want.....you get it as a benefit of employment, you get what you get...or go elsewhere.

You do understand that these employers are looking to qualify for tax credits.

And the Obama Administration carved out a very fair exemption.
 
Back
Top