As promised, Deep Scientific Analysis of Most Frequent Current Events Thread Starters

GRIND said:
no mott, you are wrong. my results are 100% bias free. Sorry, but you aren't as good at this type of stuff as I am. I would know more than you.
Click to expand...
You can't bullshit a bullshitter Grind. I studied statistics too and have used them in the real world. If you can't demonstrate that the probability of rejecting your null hypothesis is less than or equal to the significance level when the null hypothesis is true, and the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis is greater than or equal to the significance level when the alternative hypothesis is true then you have no idea if your calculations are unbiased or not. You have done nothing to calculate what those significance levels are so you really have no idea about what the level of bias in your calculations are. You have not clearly stated what your null hypotheisis is or established what its rejection probability is nor calculated the significance level of your null hypothesis to be rejected or accepted.

And that's just bias in your hypothesis. I also see problems in selection bias and I see problems with sampling bias as well.

Shoddy work dude but you get an A+ for the histograms and bar charts! Those were well done! :)
 
hazlnut said:
You actually believe he came up with that on his own?

He's a classic copy/paster. Never an original though.
Click to expand...
Irrelevent. The point made was factually correct. In fact, we all do that all the time. It's rare that anyone ever draws an independent conclusion. More often than not we learn from others. Myself included.
 
Also, to skew the bias in Grinds calculation even further I suggest that we commit the remainder of this discussion in this thread for at least the next several hundred posts to "What is your favorite Flavor of Kool-Aid". Personally mine is grape.
 
Mott the Hoople said:
You can't bullshit a bullshitter Grind. I studied statistics too and have used them in the real world. If you can't demonstrate that the probability of rejecting your null hypothesis is less than or equal to the significance level when the null hypothesis is true, and the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis is greater than or equal to the significance level when the alternative hypothesis is true then you have no idea if your calculations are unbiased or not. You have done nothing to calculate what those significance levels are so you really have no idea about what the level of bias in your calculations are. You have not clearly stated what your null hypotheisis is or established what its rejection probability is nor calculated the significance level of your null hypothesis to be rejected or accepted.

And that's just bias in your hypothesis. I also see problems in selection bias and I see problems with sampling bias as well.

Shoddy work dude but you get an A+ for the histograms and bar charts! Those were well done! :)
Click to expand...

mott I really don't get why you don't understand this. I used advanced data plotting techniques that aren't even known by most people. It's way beyond your level. Using these methods makes it so there is 100% no bias in any sample at all. The rejection probability is 0% because of the tangent algorithms I used in conjunction with shade prediction. Educate yourself
 
Last edited:
Mott the Hoople said:
Also, to skew the bias in Grinds calculation even further I suggest that we commit the remainder of this discussion in this thread for at least the next several hundred posts to "What is your favorite Flavor of Kool-Aid". Personally mine is grape.
Click to expand...

if people are interested in talking about kool-aid, it is irrelevant. my thread has a positive jpp interest index now. Also I met my average, so suck it broski.
 
The trolls post outlandish crap that the more serious posters think they MUST respond to because they just can't let the trolls lies
go without comment....
Posts relating undeniable facts instead of opinions, just don't get more response because you can't argue with fact.....
so, though the graph might be fun, but its meaningless in a real sense....
 
Mott the Hoople said:
Also, to skew the bias in Grinds calculation even further I suggest that we commit the remainder of this discussion in this thread for at least the next several hundred posts to "What is your favorite Flavor of Kool-Aid". Personally mine is grape.
Click to expand...

Your being a fan of Kool-Aid is no surprise to anyone....its been obvious from the get go.....
 
bravo said:
The trolls post outlandish crap that the more serious posters think they MUST respond to because they just can't let the trolls lies
go without comment....
Posts relating undeniable facts instead of opinions, just don't get more response because you can't argue with fact.....
so, though the graph might be fun, but its meaningless in a real sense....
Click to expand...

it's actually very meaningful, it's 100% accurate, 100% bias free, and shows the true jpp interest level for each poster.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top