Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
i agree that it is a mixture. same goes for behavioral traits of 'bad' kids who are sent to behavioral camps.
so, if you are for this ban, how can you support other behavioral camps?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
CA Bans Gay Conversion Theory for Minors
- Thread starter hazlnut
- Start date
i agree that it is a mixture. same goes for behavioral traits of 'bad' kids who are sent to behavioral camps.
so, if you are for this ban, how can you support other behavioral camps?
Nice post. But if a genetic marker for queerism is found, the fetus would be aborted. Who wants a genetically inferior baby? Nobody wants to give birth to a queer. That's a fact Jack
You ignore the facts. As the link I posted notes, the suspected markers are not deterministic. In order to avoid giving birth to a homosexual the mother would have to abort ALL male children. That is not likely.
canceled.2021.1
#AMERICAISDEAD
You ignore the facts. As the link I posted notes, the suspected markers are not deterministic. In order to avoid giving birth to a homosexual the mother would have to abort ALL male children. That is not likely.
If there is a child with the marker and a child without, bye bye child with. That simple
Since libtards claim that being queer is not a choice that means there must be a gene. One day that gene will be discovered an when it is, people will abort the queers on that basis.
So then you are arguing that it IS strictly genetic. The science does not support that position. The science does not support the idea that is strictly environmental either. Did you bother reading the link. It was not even that long.
Last edited:
So then you are arguing that it IS strictly genetic. The science does not support that position. The science does not support the idea that is strictly environmental either. Did you bothered reading the link. It was not even that long.
More than one paragraph sends the inbred racist scumbag into full cranial meltdown.
Notice that in this case, homophobia, he's advocating for abortion....it's how they roll.
Right. He goes on screeching rampages against abortion...but gays are worthy of a coat-hanger abortion.
Typical right-wing, ignorant, bigoted scum.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
i agree that it is a mixture. same goes for behavioral traits of 'bad' kids who are sent to behavioral camps.
so, if you are for this ban, how can you support other behavioral camps?
and of course the liberal circle jerk ignores actual substance.
i agree that it is a mixture. same goes for behavioral traits of 'bad' kids who are sent to behavioral camps.
so, if you are for this ban, how can you support other behavioral camps?
But who says it is a behavioral problem?
What sort of behavioral camps are you talking about? I certainly would not support any that makes a child feel inferior or as if they are in violation of Gods law. The bootcamps for children are child abuse and not effective. But this is a very sensitive issue and more deeply rooted in personal identity than just about any other behavioral "problem" I can imagine you might be hinting at.
The straightjacketed kind where sex is proscribed by narrow, bigoted views and controlled by a ministry on the make.But who says it is a behavioral problem?
What sort of behavioral camps are you talking about? I certainly would not support any that makes a child feel inferior or as if they are in violation of Gods law. The bootcamps for children are child abuse and not effective. But this is a very sensitive issue and more deeply rooted in personal identity than just about any other behavioral "problem" I can imagine you might be hinting at.
Right. He goes on screeching rampages against abortion...but gays are worthy of a coat-hanger abortion.
Typical right-wing, ignorant, bigoted scum.
Not to mention the right of California to determine how they choose to protect children. This clown has no principles and engages in vulgar sophistry in order to support his fascist dreams.
Not to mention the right of California to determine how they choose to protect children. This clown has no principles and engages in vulgar sophistry in order to support his fascist dreams.
'Clown' is putting it nicely. He's hate-mongering, trolling scum and deserving of no respect, which is why he gets none from me.
The straightjacketed kind where sex is proscribed by narrow, bigoted views and controlled by a ministry on the make.
He was asking where I would stand on other "behavioral camps." I would like some more specificity, but as I indicated probably against it.
'Clown' is putting it nicely. He's hate-mongering, trolling scum and deserving of no respect, which is why he gets none from me.
I don't have much respect for him either. It is all part of his stupid little game, to try to confuse and twist until it seems there can be no rational principles and nothing more to do but resort to violence.
If he ever gets what he wants he will lose, badly.
If there is a child with the marker and a child without, bye bye child with. That simple
READ THE LINK.
I don't have much respect for him either. It is all part of his stupid little game, to try to confuse and twist until it seems there can be no rational principles and nothing more to do but resort to violence.
If he ever gets what he wants he will lose, badly.
Unfortunately, he's a fine example of the lower-income redneck voter. Stupidly votes against his own interests because he's stupid enough to buy the racism-driven 'scapegoating' propaganda from the Right. The internet is where such types play at being perceived as 'intelligent', or 'self-employed', having a 'cleaning lady', etc. His sorry shtick's pathetically transparent but he's too stupid to quit while he's behind.
canceled.2021.1
#AMERICAISDEAD
So then you are arguing that it IS strictly genetic. The science does not support that position. The science does not support the idea that is strictly environmental either. Did you bother reading the link. It was not even that long.
So the science is "moderate" in the issue?
Unfortunately, he's a fine example of the lower-income redneck voter. Stupidly votes against his own interests because he's stupid enough to buy the racism-driven 'scapegoating' propaganda from the Right. The internet is where such types play at being perceived as 'intelligent', or 'self-employed', having a 'cleaning lady', etc. His sorry shtick's pathetically transparent but he's too stupid to quit while he's behind.
His shtick does seem very familiar.
His shtick does seem very familiar.
Of course it does. It's Alias.
Of course it does. It's Alias.
That name means nothing to me. But I am certain I can come up with some that would make StubbornResistanceToFacts eat a few more bars tonight.