Honest Question: If Obama is re-elected, where does Republican Party go from there?

I thought I just explained that to you. Dominant vs recessive alleles. I just used skin color as an example. The same applies for all genotypes. Dominant alleles are expressed over recessive alleles for any given genotype.

So according to your theory, blacks have dominant alleles almost all the time?

How does that differ from what I've said?

I'm not trying to be an asshole on this my friend. I'm looking for clarification on what you believe.
 
Sounds like you guys are mixing two different issues.....of course Mott is right about the recessive genotype and the reason for skin color
and BAC is right in saying the genes account for other physical characteristics....
As with any 2 parents contributing to the physical characteristics of their children, the kids may have Mom's eyes or nose as well as Dad's....not so with skin color.
I've heard it said that the children will always be darker than the white parent but lighter than the dark parent.....

And if you're talking about personality, thats a completely different issue.....

Interesting reading all the comments

Mott has not mixed up anything.
 
So according to your theory, blacks have dominant alleles almost all the time?

How does that differ from what I've said?

I'm not trying to be an asshole on this my friend. I'm looking for clarification on what you believe.

Its not a matter of belief....its a matter of biology.
 
She is not going to listen and if she does it will only be for the parts that feed her ego.

I take back what I said about liking you.

Perhaps in your universe you just get to say shit and expect that it should be taken as gospel. That doesn't work here.

I'm having a good conversation with someone who has a better undeerstanding of my questions than you do .. and I'm sure has no problem with me asking.

If you're such a fucking baby .. go talk to somone else.

Problem solved.
 
This is an interesting discussion. My sister is white and my brother-in-law is half white/half black (Trinidad/Tobago roots). They have 20 month old twins, a boy and a girl. The boy has darker skin tone and darker curly hair. The girl is fair skin and has blond hair. It's one of those where when you look at them you would have no idea they are related if you didn't know.
 
So according to your theory, blacks have dominant alleles almost all the time?

How does that differ from what I've said?

I'm not trying to be an asshole on this my friend. I'm looking for clarification on what you believe.

:bs:

You are looking for a way to save face and pretend that you were right all along. You are not and you are not capable of undertanding these complicated matters due to your preconceived biases against REAL science.
 
:bs:

You are looking for a way to save face and pretend that you were right all along. You are not and you are not capable of undertanding these complicated matters due to your preconceived biases against REAL science.

You again. :0)

Why?

I don't believe that face-saving is required on my part given that almost all such pairings PRODUCE children that are more identifiably black. The suggestion that genetics plays no role in that makes absolutely no sense to me .. AND, if indeed genetics does play a role, then how is that different from what I said.

You don't have to answer .. I'll hear it better from Mott.
 
I take back what I said about liking you.

Perhaps in your universe you just get to say shit and expect that it should be taken as gospel. That doesn't work here.

I'm having a good conversation with someone who has a better undeerstanding of my questions than you do .. and I'm sure has no problem with me asking.

If you're such a fucking baby .. go talk to somone else.

Problem solved.

I understand your questions just fine. I also understand Mott's answers. I actuallly LISTEN. His answers are honest and your questions are not.

Are you still not getting the jokes, needledick?
 
I understand your questions just fine. I also understand Mott's answers. I actuallly LISTEN. His answers are honest and your questions are not.

Are you still not getting the jokes, needledick?

Fuck you assclowny.

My problem isn't Mott or his answers .. and I think Mott knows that.

My problem is the assclowny that keeps posting to me. :0)
 
I take back what I said about liking you.

Perhaps in your universe you just get to say shit and expect that it should be taken as gospel. That doesn't work here.

I'm having a good conversation with someone who has a better undeerstanding of my questions than you do .. and I'm sure has no problem with me asking.

If you're such a fucking baby .. go talk to somone else.

Problem solved.

I knew you would come out soon enough, STALKER! At least I was honest and straight forward. I hoped you were too.

Mott will never get through to you anymore than I could have.
 
You again. :0)

Why?

I don't believe that face-saving is required on my part given that almost all such pairings PRODUCE children that are more identifiably black. The suggestion that genetics plays no role in that makes absolutely no sense to me .. AND, if indeed genetics does play a role, then how is that different from what I said.

You don't have to answer .. I'll hear it better from Mott.
again.....
....of course Mott is right about the recessive genotype and the reason for skin color
and BAC is right in saying the genes account for other physical characteristics....
As with any 2 parents contributing to the physical characteristics of their children, the kids may have Mom's eyes or nose as well as Dad's....not so with skin color.
I've heard it said that the children will always be darker than the white parent but lighter than the dark parent.....

And if you're talking about personality, thats a completely different issue.....certainly affected by the kids choice of friends and likes and dislikes and that the darker
skin color would certainly be a strong issue that will effect his developing personality....


Now when you said "identifiability black"....do you mean physically(skin color) and other features
or their preferences and personality....?

You've never seen a mixed race, dark skinned women that has all the physical characteristics and features of a typical white women ?

She will always be darker than non-mixed race, but her looks are determined by the combinatin of genes..
How she identifies herself will be determined by those and many other factors
 
Last edited:
I knew you would come out soon enough, STALKER! At least I was honest and straight forward. I hoped you were too.

Mott will never get through to you anymore than I could have.

Perhaps you aren't aware that Mott and I have lots of conversations and neither one of us expects the other to accept anything that we may not believe.

Strange huh, assclowny?

At what point are you going to explain this ..

"That does not mean they reject their non-white culture, but it will not move them."

4th time asking.
 
again.....
....of course Mott is right about the recessive genotype and the reason for skin color
and BAC is right in saying the genes account for other physical characteristics....
As with any 2 parents contributing to the physical characteristics of their children, the kids may have Mom's eyes or nose as well as Dad's....not so with skin color.
I've heard it said that the children will always be darker than the white parent but lighter than the dark parent.....

And if you're talking about personality, thats a completely different issue.....certainly affected by the kids choice of friends and likes and dislikes and that the darker
skin color would certainly be a strong issue that will effect his developing personality....


Now when you said "identifiability black"....do you mean physically(skin color) and other features
or their preferences and personality....?

You've never seen a mixed race, dark skinned women that has all the physical characteristics and features of a typical white women ?

What is identifiably black?

If Obama didn't tell you his mother was white, he's be just another black man to you.

Identifiably black.
 
Perhaps you aren't aware that Mott and I have lots of conversations and neither one of us expects the other to accept anything that we may not believe.

Strange huh, assclowny?

At what point are you going to explain this ..

"That does not mean they reject their non-white culture, but it will not move them."

4th time asking.


If they are taught and brought up to hate, they will......and it could go either way depending on many other factors and circumstances....

But I see by your last post, we're done....and you are more of a racist than you're aware of....
 
Back
Top