I thought I just explained that to you. Dominant vs recessive alleles.
She is not going to listen and if she does it will only be for the parts that feed her ego.
I thought I just explained that to you. Dominant vs recessive alleles.
I thought I just explained that to you. Dominant vs recessive alleles. I just used skin color as an example. The same applies for all genotypes. Dominant alleles are expressed over recessive alleles for any given genotype.
Sounds like you guys are mixing two different issues.....of course Mott is right about the recessive genotype and the reason for skin color
and BAC is right in saying the genes account for other physical characteristics....
As with any 2 parents contributing to the physical characteristics of their children, the kids may have Mom's eyes or nose as well as Dad's....not so with skin color.
I've heard it said that the children will always be darker than the white parent but lighter than the dark parent.....
And if you're talking about personality, thats a completely different issue.....
Interesting reading all the comments
So according to your theory, blacks have dominant alleles almost all the time?
How does that differ from what I've said?
I'm not trying to be an asshole on this my friend. I'm looking for clarification on what you believe.
She is not going to listen and if she does it will only be for the parts that feed her ego.
Mott has not mixed up anything.
Its not a matter of belief....its a matter of biology.
So according to your theory, blacks have dominant alleles almost all the time?
How does that differ from what I've said?
I'm not trying to be an asshole on this my friend. I'm looking for clarification on what you believe.
![]()
You are looking for a way to save face and pretend that you were right all along. You are not and you are not capable of undertanding these complicated matters due to your preconceived biases against REAL science.
I take back what I said about liking you.
Perhaps in your universe you just get to say shit and expect that it should be taken as gospel. That doesn't work here.
I'm having a good conversation with someone who has a better undeerstanding of my questions than you do .. and I'm sure has no problem with me asking.
If you're such a fucking baby .. go talk to somone else.
Problem solved.
Science trumps beliefs
I understand your questions just fine. I also understand Mott's answers. I actuallly LISTEN. His answers are honest and your questions are not.
Are you still not getting the jokes, needledick?
I take back what I said about liking you.
Perhaps in your universe you just get to say shit and expect that it should be taken as gospel. That doesn't work here.
I'm having a good conversation with someone who has a better undeerstanding of my questions than you do .. and I'm sure has no problem with me asking.
If you're such a fucking baby .. go talk to somone else.
Problem solved.
again.....You again. :0)
Why?
I don't believe that face-saving is required on my part given that almost all such pairings PRODUCE children that are more identifiably black. The suggestion that genetics plays no role in that makes absolutely no sense to me .. AND, if indeed genetics does play a role, then how is that different from what I said.
You don't have to answer .. I'll hear it better from Mott.
Genetics is belief?
I knew you would come out soon enough, STALKER! At least I was honest and straight forward. I hoped you were too.
Mott will never get through to you anymore than I could have.
again.....
....of course Mott is right about the recessive genotype and the reason for skin color
and BAC is right in saying the genes account for other physical characteristics....
As with any 2 parents contributing to the physical characteristics of their children, the kids may have Mom's eyes or nose as well as Dad's....not so with skin color.
I've heard it said that the children will always be darker than the white parent but lighter than the dark parent.....
And if you're talking about personality, thats a completely different issue.....certainly affected by the kids choice of friends and likes and dislikes and that the darker
skin color would certainly be a strong issue that will effect his developing personality....
Now when you said "identifiability black"....do you mean physically(skin color) and other features
or their preferences and personality....?
You've never seen a mixed race, dark skinned women that has all the physical characteristics and features of a typical white women ?
Perhaps you aren't aware that Mott and I have lots of conversations and neither one of us expects the other to accept anything that we may not believe.
Strange huh, assclowny?
At what point are you going to explain this ..
"That does not mean they reject their non-white culture, but it will not move them."
4th time asking.