Why I Refuse to Vote for Barack Obama

hazlnut said:
Most people who now call themselves "libertarian" are fox news viewers. Bitter far-righties who felt burned by the "Rino" McCain decided they needed to call themselves something other than Republican. Some went with Tea Partier other went with Libertarian.
Click to expand...

That is simply left wing bullshit. It is a blatant attempt to demean libertarians. You have no clue what a libertarian is. If you did, you would realize that we agree with you on many issues.

And why not call the thread "Why I'm voting for Gary"???

Face it, hack, you're busted.
Click to expand...

The fact that you call one of the most moderate posters on the board (in terms of temperament) a 'hack' shows that you simply like to spout bullshit without knowing a thing about who or what you are talking about.

Go back to watching Fox, you're daily instructions are being repeated every hour on the hour.
Click to expand...

ah yes, the traditional 'you watch Fox' pathetic attempt to demean a poster. A poster you know nothing about.
 
hazlnut said:
Most people who now call themselves "libertarian" are fox news viewers. Bitter far-righties who felt burned by the "Rino" McCain decided they needed to call themselves something other than Republican. Some went with Tea Partier other went with Libertarian.

And why not call the thread "Why I'm voting for Gary"???

Face it, hack, you're busted.

Go back to watching Fox, you're daily instructions are being repeated every hour on the hour.

Being a libertarian doesn't make you some kind of independent non-partisan thinker.



Go jerk off to a picture of Lew Doobs.
Click to expand...

Wow, aren't you a lovely addition to the board. So full of great cliches as well.

Let's see the author of the article linked to his previous writing where he wrote a similar article against Republicans.

So even though Soc has been posting here for years you have him figured out in your time of 114 posts? Since you were talking out of your ass you can ask any poster here Soc is no Republican (he's also no Democrat). A simple search would of his posts would show why he said he wouldn't, and others shouldn't, vote for Mitt Romney.

But he starts one thread on not voting for Obama and respond as if someone has attacked your family personally.

And I notice you made response to what was actually written in the article. Care to agree or refute anything that was written?
 
cawacko said:
Wow, aren't you a lovely addition to the board. So full of great cliches as well.

Let's see the author of the article linked to his previous writing where he wrote a similar article against Republicans.

So even though Soc has been posting here for years you have him figured out in your time of 114 posts? Since you were talking out of your ass you can ask any poster here Soc is no Republican (he's also no Democrat). A simple search would of his posts would show why he said he wouldn't, and others shouldn't, vote for Mitt Romney.

But he starts one thread on not voting for Obama and respond as if someone has attacked your family personally.

And I notice you made response to what was actually written in the article. Care to agree or refute anything that was written?
Click to expand...

nut has obviously been taking lessons from Dung... when you can't refute the content of an article, simply attack the author of it or attack the person who posted it.
 
hazlnut said:
Most people who now call themselves "libertarian" are fox news viewers. Bitter far-righties who felt burned by the "Rino" McCain decided they needed to call themselves something other than Republican. Some went with Tea Partier other went with Libertarian.

And why not call the thread "Why I'm voting for Gary"???

Face it, hack, you're busted.

Go back to watching Fox, you're daily instructions are being repeated every hour on the hour.

Being a libertarian doesn't make you some kind of independent non-partisan thinker.



Go jerk off to a picture of Lew Doobs.
Click to expand...
 
hazlnut said:
Most people who now call themselves "libertarian" are fox news viewers. Bitter far-righties who felt burned by the "Rino" McCain decided they needed to call themselves something other than Republican. Some went with Tea Partier other went with Libertarian.

And why not call the thread "Why I'm voting for Gary"???

Face it, hack, you're busted.

Go back to watching Fox, you're daily instructions are being repeated every hour on the hour.

Being a libertarian doesn't make you some kind of independent non-partisan thinker.



Go jerk off to a picture of Lew Doobs.
Click to expand...
I NEVER watch Fox News. I get most of my "news" from The Daily Show. Other than that I have no consistent news source. Also, i am NOT a burned out rightie. I voted for Obama last election, and my voting for President's have always been for the Democrat since 1984.
 
I have been identifying myself as a libertarian since 1992. Fox News, what the hell is that? A Tracey Ullman sketch?
 
I won't vote for B. Hussein Obama because he is half white and I don't vote for white people. I supported Herman Cain in the primary. If Obama were all black, then maybe. But that white thing is just too hard to get over
 
Socrtease said:
I NEVER watch Fox News. I get most of my "news" from The Daily Show. Other than that I have no consistent news source. Also, i am NOT a burned out rightie. I voted for Obama last election, and my voting for President's have always been for the Democrat since 1984.
Click to expand...

The Daily Show is your source for news......

Thats explains so very much.....I feel so sorry for you wallowing in your willful ignorance....
 
Beefy said:
LOL at you claiming to give a flying fuck about the constitution after 8 years of french kissing bush's ass while he wiped up with it after you were done. Partisa hack. You care about the constitution? You care about declarations of war? Signing statements? Fuck your bullshit. A vote for one party is the same as a vote for the other. They're both unconstitutional hacks, so don't pretend to care about the Constitution when you endorse violations of it based on the letter next to your teams name you big bucket of beetle boogers.
Click to expand...

Even though you're as ass, I'll explain things to you....

Bush asked for and got Congressional approval to use force in dealing with Iraq ...Thats an indisputable fact.........

A little history for you....
It is also a fact that the United Nations voted on and passed unanimously by the member nations, Resolutions against Iraq, ....The resolutions called for "serious consequences" for Iraqi noncompliance with the UN resolutions...

In fact, previous resolutions legitimizing war under Chapter VII used much stronger terms, like the use of "...all necessary means…" to force compliance
A coalition of about 40 nations joined with the United States to use "all necessary means" to force Iraq to comply with UN mandates....

I have a notion that you're pinheaded enough to think enforcing "no fly zones" on another nation, by the use of military force isn't an act of war against that nation.....ala Clinton....?
 
Back then I thought Forbes qualified as one and I guess he was not all that bad. I did shamefully vote for HW, but he lost and was a damn site better than his loser son.

God bless C-Span and Harry Browne!

But, after many years I came to realize Harry was right before he sold out and found hope. He always blamed it on his wife. Some said he was just cashing in on the suckers. I don't know but one way or the other I am sure he was right.

Issue advocacy is more important than partisan politics. I might vote for Johsnon, if I can. But I will definitely fight for his chance to be heard. As I will for Klein's. The duopoly needs to fall and I don't give a crap about your fears over the European systems or that we MIGHT elect an extremist.

We WILL elect an extremist. That is, someone who has no real concern for our Constitution, our liberties or the people IS GOING to win this election. They have been winning it for years. It is long past time we had real options. Let the factions be formed in broad daylight, not in backrooms where hidden cameras must be taken to uncover the true campaigns.

http://www.fairvote.org/
 
Last edited:
FactsRStubborn said:
:rofl2::rofl2:

Yeah. Keep telling me you are the only libertarian who doesn't believe in the free market. Admit it, you just want to legalize the ganja.
Click to expand...

WHO SAID, I DON'T BELIEVE IN THE FREE MARKET!

You? What do you know about it?

How is your reparations movement going?
 
Last edited:
cawacko said:
Wow, aren't you a lovely addition to the board. So full of great cliches as well.

Let's see the author of the article linked to his previous writing where he wrote a similar article against Republicans.

So even though Soc has been posting here for years you have him figured out in your time of 114 posts? Since you were talking out of your ass you can ask any poster here Soc is no Republican (he's also no Democrat). A simple search would of his posts would show why he said he wouldn't, and others shouldn't, vote for Mitt Romney.

But he starts one thread on not voting for Obama and respond as if someone has attacked your family personally.

And I notice you made response to what was actually written in the article. Care to agree or refute anything that was written?
Click to expand...

So you groan the post Hazlenut but have no response? Can't make an actual comment on the article?
 
Socrtease said:
I NEVER watch Fox News. I get most of my "news" from The Daily Show. Other than that I have no consistent news source. Also, i am NOT a burned out rightie. I voted for Obama last election, and my voting for President's have always been for the Democrat since 1984.
Click to expand...

so YOU were the one person who voted Mondale?
 
Socrtease said:
I NEVER watch Fox News. I get most of my "news" from The Daily Show. Other than that I have no consistent news source. Also, i am NOT a burned out rightie. I voted for Obama last election, and my voting for President's have always been for the Democrat since 1984.
Click to expand...

And no response to this as well Hazlenut?
 
Beefy said:
LOL at you claiming to give a flying fuck about the constitution after 8 years of french kissing bush's ass while he wiped up with it after you were done. Partisa hack. You care about the constitution? You care about declarations of war? Signing statements? Fuck your bullshit. A vote for one party is the same as a vote for the other. They're both unconstitutional hacks, so don't pretend to care about the Constitution when you endorse violations of it based on the letter next to your teams name you big bucket of beetle boogers.
Click to expand...

awesome
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top