Stymie
New member
I don't agree with everything but there is much food for thought in this 1933 speech. Essentially, he seems to be saying that not everything was the fault of the Jews. He points out, and I believe rightly, that the Jews had some help. Before anyone starts throwing out heated accusations, I am specially stating that I agree he erred a bit by going overboard on the Jewish question. But there his views on women do bear some resonance. It’s just not politically correct to say so.
My German countrymen, men and women, (long pause) Changes of Government have occurred frequently in history, and in the history of our people. It is certain, however, that never was a change of Government attended with such far-reaching results as that eight years ago. At that time the situation of the Reich was desperate. We were under siege from the Jews. We are still under siege. For us, it is a problem of whether our nation can ever recover its health, whether the Jewish spirit can ever really be eradicated. Don't be misled into thinking you can fight a disease without killing the carrier, without destroying the bacillus. Don't think you can fight racial tuberculosis without taking care to rid the nation of the carrier of that racial tuberculosis…none other than Radical Feminism. For where would the Jew be without the support of the Radical Feminists?
This Jewish contamination will not subside, this poisoning of the nation will not end, until the carrier herself, the Radical Feminist, has been banished from our midst