If you read nothing else today read this.

Islam is a religion of peace.
no religion of peace would have specific ways of declaring holy war. Nor would it advocate for the death of apostates. STOP LYING

One cannot take the good of a religion and convientently ignore all of the bad.



BUT

According to Pew
82% of Pakistan's muslims support the stoning of adulterers. Peace to you all.
76% support the death penalty for apostacy. In the name of allah.
85% support gender segregation by law in the workplace.

hmmm i wonder the FUCK WHY?
 
no religion of peace would have specific ways of declaring holy war. Nor would it advocate for the death of apostates. STOP LYING

One cannot take the good of a religion and convientently ignore all of the bad.





hmmm i wonder the FUCK WHY?

I would guess, from the above, that you have absolutely no idea of the purpose or meaning of my post.
 
and with that, it's time for sleep.

Goodnight.

t1qov.gif
 
who cares? I am not allowed to call out falsehoods for what they are?

:dealwithit:
What do you mean by 'falsehood'?And what are falsehoods?
Is an example of what another person believes a falsehood? What he believes may be, but not when used as an example of the lie that it is.
Am I going too fast for you?
Nevermind, have your wheatypops and a spliff and I am sure you will understand.
 
Islam is a religion of peace.
I know quite a lot of Muslims from maids to business leaders and they are, as far as I can tell, decent peaceful people.


BUT


According to Pew
82% of Pakistan's muslims support the stoning of adulterers. Peace to you all.
76% support the death penalty for apostacy. In the name of allah.
85% support gender segregation by law in the workplace.

and a government minister has offered $100,000 for the head of the person who made that silly little movie.

You have to admire a people who, with that evidence, still argue that they are peaceful and that Mohammed preached peace and harmony.

Now, here's the killer.
The US has given $2840.6 million in aid to this gaggle of goonies since 2009 and continues to give. And when a bill went before congress to reduce aid to Pakistan it was defeated.

The bill (S3576) was defeated by 81 to 10 votes. Introduced by Senator Rand Paul, the bill also called for cutting all US aid to Libya and Egypt till those who were responsible for the attacks on American missions in the two countries were arrested and handed over to the US.

And dont think it is only the US, the UK is 'proud' to be giving Pakistan millions. In 2010 and 2011 the UK gave GBP200 million per year! 200 million quid to rebuild a failed state when Pakistan's own people wreck buildings, deny education, preach war and violence.

Are we really this crazy?

You mean to say that in different countries they have a different set of values?

Allah forbid!!
 
The problem is Pakistan. The problem is that we, the west, keep giving them millions and millions of dollars and never lay on the line that we will no longer tolerate their behaviour.
In other words the problem is Pakistan, the solution is to stop giving them money. Politicians have an agenda that is open only to conjecture.

Wow, we agree on something. Nice change of pace.
 
Wow, we agree on something. Nice change of pace.

If one believes in justice one believes in justice for all and everywhere. The UK is giving money to Iceland for chrissakes! And we have more people in poverty Iceland does. I would guess that 99% of all so called 'aid' is politically decided upon. Politicians decide to give your money and my money to already wealthy countries and to countries who use that money to cause us harm.
It
must
stop

Oh, say some, Pakistan has nuclear arms and if...if they... if IF NOTHING! They are as likely to use those bombs on our allies as upon our enemies and they will decide whether or not we give them billions.
Yes, give aid, but by everything held dear, monitor that gift and give it from the heart and not from a desire for personal advantage.
If we were to overthrow Israel and disarm them, we might find ourselves thrown into a peaceful Middle East. Of course, none of us want that!!!
 
perhaps it is because that he married very young girls

unfortunately, it was the custom at the time (and still is in some places) for a girl to marry as young as 9 years old although her husband was not supposed to have sex with her until she had her first period, although some a**holes did not wait

so, according to our standards, he was a pedophile

He married Aisha when she was 6 years old and consummated his marriage with her when she was 9. He was then, 54 years old.
 
Back
Top