It's not incumbent on him to ask them. He also stated on the rape thread that "every man here agrees with me" after expressing some incredible rape apologia. It was incumbent on the men to man up and inform him that they do not.
It is incumbent on the women to tell them they do not.
He's getting way with a lot because no one but you and i will confront him. So he can cast us as extremist humorless feminists.
I'm done with that.
PS - I'm so much funnier and wittier than Tom is there is no contest. The idea that he is funny and I am humorless may be the most outrageous claim on this board.
According to one of the Liberal posters on this forum, you are a douchebag; because you fail to acknowledge that you're wrong.
This entire things boils down to Tom saying that FALSE rape accusations have been made by women and while you agree that there are SOME, you want the accused put through the wringer until he's PROVEN INNOCENT.
And here I thought our court system was designed to ASSUME INNOCENCE, UNTIL GUILT HAS BEEN
PROVEN.
You have refused to acknowledge this; because it puts giant holes in your feminest agenda of
Since some men have gotten away with rape, this means that all men must suffer.
I'm sorry you were raped and no one believed you and I'm sorry that you've turned into such a spiteful - hateful - bitch about it; but seek help and stop letting the rapist live in your head for free.
There is no one on this forum that thinks rapists should go free; but most believe that such charges need proof that the charge is true and not just feeling that it must be true.
If your brother(s) were charged with rape, which thought process would you want to have followed?
Should they be assumed guilty or should they be assumed innocent, until evidence proves him/them guilty?
Now go take your faux outrage and tell it to that wimp you say you found, boyfriend. <skeptism>