SmarterthanYou
rebel
generally, but that does include police.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Cowardly Oficer shoots and kills Double Amputee???
- Thread starter signalmankenneth
- Start date
SmarterthanYou
rebel
you're damn skippy I wouldn't have. I wouldn't have let some moron in a wheelchair pin me in a corner to begin with.WB had no issue second-guessing a life-or-death situation a while back.
Are you saying you wouldn't have reacted the same way the officer in this case did?
G
Guns Guns Guns
Guest
Its hard to believe there was no other option.
If only you'd been there...
G
Guns Guns Guns
Guest
you're damn skippy I wouldn't have. I wouldn't have let some moron in a wheelchair pin me in a corner to begin with.
So you'd have shot the amputee in the wheelchair only if you thought he was going to violate your rights?
Canceled.2014.1
New member
So you didn't boast that you wouldn't have wounded any bystanders?
Thats not what I said. I simply pointed out that I posted "What I did was "brag" that I could have done better", so when you tried to add "And you boasted that you would've done a better job" you were wrong.
I didn't say I could have done better and that I would've done a better job. That would have been redundant.
Canceled.2014.1
New member
If only you'd been there...
Well I can't be everywhere.
I just checked the date of this incident. My cape was at the cleaners.
Last edited:
G
Guns Guns Guns
Guest
Well I can't be everywhere. I just checked the date of this incident. My cape was at the cleaners.
Along with your credibility?
Canceled.2014.1
New member
Along with your credibility?
What have I posted that lacked credibility? It seems that most people who comment on me here don't seem to think I lack credibility.
G
Guns Guns Guns
Guest
What have I posted that lacked credibility? It seems that most people who comment on me here don't seem to think I lack credibility.
LOL, let's examine your list of character witnesses.
So you didn't boast that you wouldn't have wounded any bystanders?
Canceled.2014.1
New member
LOL, let's examine your list of character witnesses.
So you didn't boast that you wouldn't have wounded any bystanders?
Lets examine the topic at hand. The previous topic was overdone already. If you have more issues on the previous topic, reopen the previous thread.
G
Guns Guns Guns
Guest
Lets examine the topic at hand. The previous topic was overdone already. If you have more issues on the previous topic, reopen the previous thread.
LOL
Canceled.2014.1
New member
Also, there is a major difference between this topic and the other one, as far as my comments are concerned. In the previous thread I agreed with their actions, I just questioned their skills and training levels. In this thread I do not agree with their actions.
G
Guns Guns Guns
Guest
Also, there is a major difference between this topic and the other one, as far as my comments are concerned. In the previous thread I agreed with their actions, I just questioned their skills and training levels. In this thread I do not agree with their actions.
How so?
Canceled.2014.1
New member
How so?
How so, what? What part of my statement was unclear? It seemed rather simple to me.
Are you asking "How so?" regarding my question the officers level of training in the other thread? Are you questioning "How so" in that I agreed with the actions of the officers? Or are you asking about my disagreeing with the actions of the officers in this thread?
You'll have to be more specific.
G
Guns Guns Guns
Guest
How so, what? What part of my statement was unclear? It seemed rather simple to me. Are you asking "How so?" regarding my question the officers level of training in the other thread? Are you questioning "How so" in that I agreed with the actions of the officers? Or are you asking about my disagreeing with the actions of the officers in this thread? You'll have to be more specific.
I suppose I must.
According to the events as reported in the OP, what specifically would you - with your boasted shooting skills and imperviousness to panic - have done that the officer on the scene didn't?
Canceled.2014.1
New member
I suppose I must.
According to the events as reported in the OP, what specifically would you - with your boasted shooting skills and imperviousness to panic - have done that the officer on the scene didn't?
Not shoot the amputee. I would have tried something other than deadly force.
G
Guns Guns Guns
Guest
Not shoot the amputee. I would have tried something other than deadly force.
Because you - with your razor-sharp shooting skills and uncanny ability not to panic - would have realized that the decedent did not pose a threat, even though he refused repeated orders to drop the silver object he was holding?
Awesome.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Are you saying that it is illegal to shoot someone unless they are killed?
In AZ and some other States; there are laws that state that it is against the law to shoot, where the intent is to wound or maim.
If you have to shoot someone, you better not make the statement that you intended to wound them.
G
Guns Guns Guns
Guest
In AZ and some other States; there are laws that state that it is against the law to shoot, where the intent is to wound or maim.
Cite these laws, will you?
cancel2 2022
Canceled
In AZ and some other States; there are laws that state that it is against the law to shoot, where the intent is to wound or maim.
If you have to shoot someone, you better not make the statement that you intended to wound them.
Are you talking about private citizens? I fail to see the logic behind this.