Antarctic Sea Ice Sets Another Record

tinfoil said:
lets see them! After you post them we'll show you the flawed methodology and you'll be forced to accept you were duped by government scientists with every reason to lie
Click to expand...

You assume he possesses the self awareness to accept that he was duped. Very few do. He is on a mission to save the world. How do you hope to contend with that? Man made global warming is a religion to these people. Algore is their prophet and they worship at the alter of government.

I 100% guarantee that he thinks OWEbama can lower the oceans
 
Rune said:
You do undertand the difference between spelling an capitalising right? Why don't you give yurt some shit for a while?

This reminds me of every other corporate denial of reality since tobacco.
Click to expand...

Are you dyslexic? There are two 'c's in Antarctic. As for Yurt, I did but he gets all antsy, just like you.
 
Just an FYI about James Taylor. He's from the Heartland Institute. So I know why he's a denialist. The rest of you leave me puzzled.
 
Here is a question for the libtard Warmers since they think we have so much control over our weather/climate.

If we wanted to melt an iceberg, how would we do it? Conversely, if we wanted to create one, how would we do it?

Ready? Go.
 
Superfreak said:
Link us up to the totals... how many are shrinking, how many are growing. Where are they located, etc...
Click to expand...

I bet they quote the NGO-derived meme that the Himalayas are gonna melt by 2035. LOL I hear it all the time despite being debunked and corrected by the IPCC. Most warmers are working from data that's expired. They don't really bother to study anything new and trod out the same arguments time and again. For example the "97%" argument they love to spout.
 
tinfoil said:
I bet they quote the NGO-derived meme that the Himalayas are gonna melt by 2035. LOL I hear it all the time despite being debunked and corrected by the IPCC. Most warmers are working from data that's expired. They don't really bother to study anything new and trod out the same arguments time and again. For example the "97%" argument they love to spout.
Click to expand...

Oh and don't forget that in 2 years we are going to pass the point of no return according to Algore. I can't wait :)
 
tinfoil said:
I see the warmer can't find even a single "proof" of CAGW!
It's clearly undeniable
Click to expand...

You sound just like the evolution deniers and holocaust deniers. Mountains of evidence pointing in one direction, yet you deny everything because apparently, one single piece of evidence can't prove it alone. No surviving direct written order from Hitler for the holocaust? Clearly he had nothing to do with it and it never happened!
 
Underworld King Star said:
You sound just like the evolution deniers and holocaust deniers. Mountains of evidence pointing in one direction, yet you deny everything because apparently, one single piece of evidence can't prove it alone. No surviving direct written order from Hitler for the holocaust? Clearly he had nothing to do with it and it never happened!
Click to expand...

You can't cite even a specific item such as the proof that anthropogenic CO2 has a positive or negative feedback. Go ahead and search, you'll see that something as rudimentary as the sign of the feedback we should ascribe to CO2 forcing is still an unknown.

like I said earlier, you warmers don't keep up to date with your "facts"
 
Underworld King Star said:
You sound just like the evolution deniers and holocaust deniers. Mountains of evidence pointing in one direction, yet you deny everything because apparently, one single piece of evidence can't prove it alone. No surviving direct written order from Hitler for the holocaust? Clearly he had nothing to do with it and it never happened!
Click to expand...

Could explain how all of these models and science controls for water vapor?

I heard it from Glenn Beck and it sounded really cool so I thought I would ask. Thanks
 
This sort of story is intended to confuse the public, to everyone's peril. Greenland by itself is evidence that we have a problem on our hands.
 
Voltaire said:
This sort of story is intended to confuse the public, to everyone's peril. Greenland by itself is evidence that we have a problem on our hands.
Click to expand...

Yes. Too many people believe the myth that is man made global warming.

Common sense alone tells you it is a lie.

The Warmers want us to believe that the erf is hundreds of millions of years old and everything on it, in it and about it came about due to random chance.

They also want us to believe that ONLY in the last 100 years has the erf seen changes unlike anything it has ever seen before in its hundreds of millions of years AND that we will destroy said erf.

Yeah, I call BULLSHIT
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top