Actual Experts

Darla said:
We will see. I don't believe they will control both the house and the senate actually.
Click to expand...
The house is looking like the Presidential race. It's going to take something big to happen in the next 60 days for Dems to have a chance of taking the house. It's not very likely. In the Senate there are only about 5 toss up races. That leaves Dems with 48 and Repubs with 47. Of those five toss up States Repubs have very small leads in 4 (less than 2%). That means Dems need to win 3 of those 5 races and the statistical probability of that happening aren't good.
 
Superfreak said:
No way the Dems take the House, they will be lucky to keep the Senate... my guess right now is a 50/50 Senate with Uncle Joe being the tie breaker...

that should be fun if it does indeed happen.
Click to expand...
Agreed on the house. Though I'd say it's looking like Repubs take the Senate 52 to 48. I'll be surprized if Dems keep the Senate.
 
blackascoal said:
Neither Krugman nor Stiglitz are looking for the same outcomes from the economy as Obama. Obama has to ensure the corporate profit-taking.

Absolutely Obama will win a second term. But the question is, what will he do when he no longer has to worry about being re-elected? He didn't pay progressives much attention when he did. He did virtually nothing about banking failures and he ignored Krugman and Stiglitz on the size of the stimulus.

All indicators are that he will more more to the right.
Click to expand...

Or to the left. Perhaps his pandering to the pharmaceutical companies and police unions/prison corps is about getting re-elected.
 
blackascoal said:
Neither Krugman nor Stiglitz are looking for the same outcomes from the economy as Obama. Obama has to ensure the corporate profit-taking.

Absolutely Obama will win a second term. But the question is, what will he do when he no longer has to worry about being re-elected? He didn't pay progressives much attention when he did. He did virtually nothing about banking failures and he ignored Krugman and Stiglitz on the size of the stimulus.

All indicators are that he will more more to the right.
Click to expand...

a lot depends on whether the repugs control the house and/or the senate as to what obama can accomplish...
 
Darla said:
Yes SF believe it or not I actually read the posts you put on the thread I started. Other than that I do avoid your posts and I do have you on IA.

Give me a break with your temper tantrum here. You talk all the time about your field, everyone here knows what it is. You know what you did in that post, just like you know what you did on Tom's thread. You have no honor and a very low character.

One time. If there is a second incident I don't go to Damo. Don't let there be that second time. I will never discuss this on this board again, flip out all you want.
Click to expand...

She had you on IA; before she took you off IA, is what she meant.

I was able to draw the conclusion, from the posts, that Darlak feels her life is off limits; but it's OK if and when she mentions someone else's life.

But then; she lies about anything, GREAT AND SMALL.
 
Superfreak said:
Dearest Darla, how about you stop mentioning me in your posts and that way you won't get all enraged when I respond to them???

Also, again... I am free to comment on any thread I wish. You don't like that... tough shit.



You truly are a deranged lunatic. The only one who threw a tantrum today was again... YOU.

I responded to the article in the thread OP.



So? You have stated that you are a business owner on the board Darla... hence you have clients. How many times have I heard you (though granted toppy does it far more) say that I rip off old ladies? You did it as a joke. Period. I understand that. I ripped on you in the same manner and you go apeshit? Yeah... you are indeed the one with the anger issues.



coming from you that is indeed laughable.



Dearest Darla... fuck off.

Don't mention me or reference me ever again... or shut the fuck up. You don't get it both ways.
Click to expand...

It wasn't that long ago that she mentioned her brothers business (I think she just works there and doesn't own shit) and a delivery man, that was well built.
I wonder if this person (another imaginary friend), that she says she's in a relationship with, knows that she's having fantasy's about another man.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
It wasn't that long ago that she mentioned her brothers business (I think she just works there and doesn't own shit) and a delivery man, that was well built.
I wonder if this person (another imaginary friend), that she says she's in a relationship with, knows that she's having fantasy's about another man.
Click to expand...

Trolling, trolling over on jpp, oh, I'm trolling, lalalaaala
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top