Romney Refuses To Identify ANY Corporate Loop Holes He Will Close

consagainromney

consagainromney

Verified User
SUnday morning on Meet the Depressed, David Gregory asked Flip Romney THREE times to give a specific tax loop hole he plans to close and Flip Romney turned into Patches O'Houlihan reciting the five D's of Dodgeball: Dodge, duck, dive, dip...and dodge...



Romney is a liar. We know this.
The Social Conservative Wing of the Republican Party does not like Romney.
The Fiscal Conservative Wing of the Republican Party does not like Romney.
So who does that leave?

It leaves the Wall Street Republicans, which is why Romney is refusing to identify an specific loop holes he is going to close on his cronies. And that is because he is NOT really planning on closing any.
In the debates, or even Sooner Romney is going to get pressured into giving specifics about which tax loopholes he is going to shut. If he continues to Dodge the question then it just becomes all that more obvious that he is lying once again.

Maybe Flip has learned that his flip flops are less obvious when he does not give specifics, and after 10 years of campaigning for POTUS he has now perfected the art of doing alot of talking but not saying a God damned thing! That way he wont have to flip flop - he can just dodge, duck, dip, dive and...dodge.
 
Last edited:
FactsRStubborn said:
So what. If he does, will you vote for him?
Click to expand...

He has lied and misled voters WAAAAAY too much for me to ever consider voting for him. Every day he is seeming like nothing more than a much better looking Dick Nixon.
His being shifty about his taxes, his being shifty about not revealing which loop holes he will close, his being shifty about his time at Bain Capital, plus all of his flip flopping...I mean, HELL NO!
This guy can NOT be trusted.
 
consagainromney said:
He has lied and misled voters WAAAAAY too much for me to ever consider voting for him. Every day he is seeming like nothing more than a much better looking Dick Nixon.
His being shifty about his taxes, his being shifty about not revealing which loop holes he will close, his being shifty about his time at Bain Capital, plus all of his flip flopping...I mean, HELL NO!
This guy can NOT be trusted.
Click to expand...

You will be fine. Just stick with your 1040EZ
 
FactsRStubborn said:
You will be fine. Just stick with your 1040EZ
Click to expand...
ROmney is not being square with us.
He is refusing to tell us his plan. Just like he refused to tell his role with Bain. Just like he refused to release his taxes.
Why would you vote for a guy who will not give any specifics about how he is going to fix things. I mean only the dullest Partisan Hack would be dumb enough to say, "Gee, okay Vulture Capitalist. You say you can fix the economy, but you can't tell us how until we elect you. Okay, that sounds good to me!"
You know Dick Nixon used the EXACT SAME FUNKING TACTIC in 1968 in dealing with the War in Vietnam. He promised he could fix the war, but he couldn't tell us how until after we elected him... And Boy, that worked out just great, didn't it???
 
consagainromney said:
ROmney is not being square with us.
He is refusing to tell us his plan. Just like he refused to tell his role with Bain. Just like he refused to release his taxes.
Why would you vote for a guy who will not give any specifics about how he is going to fix things. I mean only the dullest Partisan Hack would be dumb enough to say, "Gee, okay Vulture Capitalist. You say you can fix the economy, but you can't tell us how until we elect you. Okay, that sounds good to me!"
You know Dick Nixon used the EXACT SAME FUNKING TACTIC in 1968 in dealing with the War in Vietnam. He promised he could fix the war, but he couldn't tell us how until after we elected him... And Boy, that worked out just great, didn't it???
Click to expand...

You seem very worked up this morning. You are voting for Maobama no matter what. So why are you stressing? Are you trying to convince me? If I tell you that you changed my mind will you lower your blood pressure?

:rofl2:
 
FactsRStubborn said:
You seem very worked up this morning. You are voting for Maobama no matter what. So why are you stressing? Are you trying to convince me? If I tell you that you changed my mind will you lower your blood pressure?

:rofl2:
Click to expand...

I don't like being jerked around and lied to. Do YOU?
Do you know why people turned on Nixon and hated him so much? Because he did the exact same BS that Flip Flomney is doing! He jerked the AMerican people around. This election can not come fast enough for me. The quicker Flipper gets kicked to the curb the quicker our intelligence stops being insulted every day.

Honestly, tell me something. Why do YOU think Flip refuses to tell what loop holes he will close? Why do YOU think he refuses to tell us his "magical" plan to save the economy???
I mean come on - you arent really falling for his hoak us-poke us, are you???
 
consagainromney said:
I don't like being jerked around and lied to. Do YOU?
Do you know why people turned on Nixon and hated him so much? Because he did the exact same BS that Flip Flomney is doing! He jerked the AMerican people around. This election can not come fast enough for me. The quicker Flipper gets kicked to the curb the quicker our intelligence stops being insulted every day.

Honestly, tell me something. Why do YOU think Flip refuses to tell what loop holes he will close? Why do YOU think he refuses to tell us his "magical" plan to save the economy???
I mean come on - you arent really falling for his hoak us-poke us, are you???
Click to expand...

Again, it doesn't really matter. You are supporting Chairman Maobama and I am going for a write in candidate.

I have said before that it doesn't really matter who wins the election. The country is fucked because too many people really think you can have something for nothing.
 
The people are smart enough to know that this fuzzy campaign of Mitts is not being genuine with the them.
 
Jarod said:
The people are smart enough to know that this fuzzy campaign of Mitts is not being genuine with the them.
Click to expand...

Right because Maobama kept all of his campaign promises and provides soooooooo many specifics.

Yeah we get it, all we need is a 4% increase in taxes on those making $250,000 a year and it is morning in America again. So sayeth Chairman Maobama
 
FactsRStubborn said:
Again, it doesn't really matter. You are supporting Chairman Maobama and I am going for a write in candidate.

I have said before that it doesn't really matter who wins the election. The country is fucked because too many people really think you can have something for nothing.
Click to expand...

I agree that there are too many lazy people on welfare and on unemployment. That is why I think that if you are on unemployment, in order to get your check, you should have to provide proof that you are looking for a job OR you are putting in 20 hours of volunteering or comunity work per month.
I also think that people on welfare should be drug tested.

But the lazy people on welfare and unemployment is NOT the biggest problem with this country. The biggest problem is the ideology of Greed is Good that people like Flip Flomney prescribe to.
 
consagainromney said:
Either that, or he doesnt really have a plan. Just more old voo doo trickle down bologna...
Click to expand...

Oh he has a plan don't worry about that...

...in order to make sure his plan would not add to the deficit, Romney would have to pay for $86 billion worth of high-income tax cuts by cutting deductions that benefit middle- and low-income earners, according the Tax Policy Center study.
If his plan is to be revenue neutral, as Romney has said it would be, the study shows he would have to raise taxes on 95 percent of Americans – families earning less than $200,000 – by an average of $500 per year. Millionaires will still get an $87,000 tax cut.

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/08/how-romneys-tax-plan-could-raise-middle-class-taxes/
 
Jarod said:
The people are smart enough to know that this fuzzy campaign of Mitts is not being genuine with the them.
Click to expand...

evince said:
they cant tell you what they plan to do because the american people will hate it.
Click to expand...

consagainromney said:
He has lied and misled voters WAAAAAY too much for me to ever consider voting for him. Every day he is seeming like nothing more than a much better looking Dick Nixon.
His being shifty about his taxes, his being shifty about not revealing which loop holes he will close, his being shifty about his time at Bain Capital, plus all of his flip flopping...I mean, HELL NO!
This guy can NOT be trusted.
Click to expand...


So you want Corporate loopholes closed....

So what as Obama done in this area in 4 years....even when he enjoyed an unbeatable majority in both houses of congress?
Right, NOTHING....

and what loopholes has he said he will close?
Right again, NOTHING
 
bravo said:
So you want Corporate loopholes closed....

So what as Obama done in this area in 4 years....even when he enjoyed an unbeatable majority in both houses of congress?
Right, NOTHING....

and what loopholes has he said he will close?
Right again, NOTHING
Click to expand...

By the end of these six years with a Democratic-controlled Senate, Republicans will have used the filibuster to block legislation more than 400 times, annually double any of the previous 12 years under GOP control.

Among the latest bills being filibustered is one to create a veterans job corps. Other lock step GOP filibusters tried to block job-creating efforts, such as a huge transportation-funding bill. And there were cruel ones to block extending food stamps at a time of a weak economy and high unemployment, blocking extensions of unemployment insurance and payroll tax cuts, a middle-class tax cut and dozens of others intended to stimulate jobs and the economy. Others tried to block bills to prevent a repeat of the reckless private-sector financial behavior that brought about the global economic collapse.

During the past five years the Democrats have had a majority in the Senate, once by a one-vote margin, they had the 60 votes required to choke off a filibuster only for three weeks. No wonder President Barack Obama can't get anything passed."
http://www.mauinews.com/page/conten...ters-to-obstruct-Obama--Democrats.html?nav=18

TIME just published “The Party of No,” an article adapted from my new book, The New New Deal: The Hidden Story of Change in the Obama Era. It reveals some of my reporting on the Republican plot to obstruct President Obama before he even took office, including secret meetings led by House GOP whip Eric Cantor (in December 2008) and Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell (in early January 2009) in which they laid out their daring (though cynical and political) no-honeymoon strategy of all-out resistance to a popular President-elect during an economic emergency. “If he was for it,” former Ohio Senator George Voinovich explained, “we had to be against it.” The excerpt includes a special bonus nugget of Mitt Romney dissing the Tea Party.

Read more: http://swampland.time.com/2012/08/2...the-gop-plot-to-obstruct-obama/#ixzz26BUwm8I1

What planet do you live on? Where ever it is it's not earth.
 
2007-2009.......49/49.(Democrat)......233/198......Democrat
2009-2011.......57/41 Democrat.........256/178......Democrat
2011-2013.......51/47 Democrat.........193/242......Republican

Senate numbers do not include 2 independents that vote with the Democrats....

Democrats had a filibuster proof Congress from 7/2009 (Franken) to the end of 2010.....and did nothing.

But they will cry about Kennedy and Byrd missing votes due to sickness....too bad, not the Republicans fault....

Dems ought to be used to Congressmen of theirs that won't or can't do their duty.....BO himself, while serving in Ill. voted "PRESENT' 130 times rather than do his duty
to make the hard chooses for the state.....


Rather than belabor the point....just answer to second question....

What loopholes has Obama said he will close?
 
bravo said:
2007-2009.......49/49.(Democrat)......233/198......Democrat
2009-2011.......57/41 Democrat.........256/178......Democrat
2011-2013.......51/47 Democrat.........193/242......Republican

Senate numbers do not include 2 independents that vote with the Democrats....

Democrats had a filibuster proof Congress from 7/2009 (Franken) to the end of 2010.....and did nothing.

But they will cry about Kennedy and Byrd missing votes due to sickness....too bad, not the Republicans fault....

Dems ought to be used to Congressmen of theirs that won't or can't do their duty.....BO himself, while serving in Ill. voted "PRESENT' 130 times rather than do his duty
to make the hard chooses for the state.....


Rather than belabor the point....just answer to second question....

What loopholes has Obama said he will close?
Click to expand...


Uh, Kennedy didn't miss votes due to sickness. He died in August 2009. His successor was appointed in September 2009 and then Scott Brown won his seat in November 2009. Basically, the Democrats had a supermajority from Franken's seating until Brown's election, which was just a few months.
 
General Buck Turgidson said:
Uh, Kennedy didn't miss votes due to sickness. He died in August 2009. His successor was appointed in September 2009 and then Scott Brown won his seat in November 2009. Basically, the Democrats had a supermajority from Franken's seating until Brown's election, which was just a few months.
Click to expand...

During the first year of the Obama presidency, due to his illness Kennedy missed 261 out of a possible 270 votes in the Senate

Two ind. voters vote with the Democrats 99% of the time......= a super majority....

now back to the topic...

What loopholes has Obama said he will close?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top