Why do so many on the left make the presidential race about skin color?

How does even the most unsightly of personal past dictate on an impersonal post meant to discuss the validity of a statement? Instead of counter debate fueled with intelligent facts and examples we got the equivalent of a third grader with a thesaurus as well as thier big brothers foul vocabulary...... Again in my opinion.

Yes, it is your opinion, and one that is misplaced not knowing the history of posters. Intelligent debate and facts are lost on some posters and other posters lose patience, but you go ahead and judge based on your limited history of this board and it's personalities.
 
Hmm Rama by chance what is your personal opinion on the thread's topic? Do you have one or is what I am about to hear going to be more ra ra and Thieves cant regarding how its not true . Maybe I will hear more trash talking from one who is so inept at it that he resorts to dildo breath. See if I so felt inclined to insult you rama I would simply state "Rama is a piteously foolish subhuman and a decadent irredeemably boring nefarious vermin." But I guess dildo breath is hurtful ^.^.
 
Hmm Rama by chance what is your personal opinion on the thread's topic? Do you have one or is what I am about to hear going to be more ra ra and Thieves cant regarding how its not true . Maybe I will hear more trash talking from one who is so inept at it that he resorts to dildo breath. See if I so felt inclined to insult you rama I would simply state "Rama is a piteously foolish subhuman and a decadent irredeemably boring nefarious vermin." But I guess dildo breath is hurtful ^.^.


Oh, look, another with a thesaurus!
 
This is not directed at anyone in particular.

It is obvious that much of the resentment against Obama is animated by his skin color. Either that or you righties are just too stupid to get out of your own way.

If you want to help Romney then quit talking about race. Obama or a Democrat brings it up, ignore them. Let them waste their energy on that. Move to the next person.
 
If whatever is said is wrong. It is wrong in the original and it is wrong in the plagiarised version. The point at which the plagiarist should be taken to task is when they 'mis-plagiarise'. That's the time they should be strung up by which ever part of their genitalia comes first to hand.... (and yes, I do know what I said!)

I'm not talking about being taken to task for erroneous content. I'm talking about the original writer of the piece taking it up with the owners of this site for having their work stolen by some asshole here passing it off as theirs.
 
This is not directed at anyone in particular.

It is obvious that much of the resentment against Obama is animated by his skin color. Either that or you righties are just too stupid to get out of your own way.

If you want to help Romney then quit talking about race. Obama or a Democrat brings it up, ignore them. Let them waste their energy on that. Move to the next person.


that is a much better plan than the Pee wee defense.
 
Good for you!!

I am certain Jesus would have told me the same thing, and your display only serves to highlight what two-faced liars most Christians truly are.


Awwwww...the "Christian" shows everyone what's really hiding deep down, underneath all the public displays of Christianity, and when I highlight his display of Christian kindness...the coward groans me.
 
see yurt
See yurt kiss new poster ass
Kiss, yurt, kiss

you're on a roll. being nice to a poster means i'm kissing ass, thus doing something you don't approve of. when i debate or get into it with a new poster, i am treating them bad, doing something you don't approve of. despite the fact you insult numerous posters all the time.

there is no winning with you. you're a two faced hater. carry on.
 
Hmm You see I look at this issue and how it has spawned multiple insults and attacks on a personal basis when One side does repetitively either bring racial bias and opinion into the matter or seek to attack the man whom was honestly just aiming to start a line of discussion. In my opinion the left isn't honestly showing capability of making a proper retort that involves a factual backdrop instead they must insult and yell ... interesting . No I am not taking a side in this particular debate. As in what this thread is supposed to be about. I just read the 15 pages and felt the need to post.

You don't start a discussion by using a phony topic like "Why do so many on the left make the presidential race about skin color?" unless you can actually prove that's a fact.

It's just an insult intended to provoke people and that's the antithesis of real debate.
 
How does even the most unsightly of personal past dictate on an impersonal post meant to discuss the validity of a statement? Instead of counter debate fueled with intelligent facts and examples we got the equivalent of a third grader with a thesaurus as well as thier big brothers foul vocabulary...... Again in my opinion.

Explain how "why do so many on the left, etc." is a valid statement.
 
i can't believe you're seriously claiming it is not true

i even gave some examples in this thread and there are some who did talk about it in this thread. how can you actually deny it?

If you were being honest you would have written "why do some on the left and right make the presidential race about skin color?"

If you're talking about JPP, I see much more race-baiting from the right than the left, prime example webbway.

If you're talking about people in general, take a look at the video someone posted the other day with all the conservatives and their bigoted comments about Obama.
 
If you were being honest you would have written "why do some on the left and right make the presidential race about skin color?"

If you're talking about JPP, I see much more race-baiting from the right than the left, prime example webbway.

If you're talking about people in general, take a look at the video someone posted the other day with all the conservatives and their bigoted comments about Obama.

i did say both sides engage in it. this thread is about the left and why so many make skin color an issue. you cite one person and claim more race baiting from the right, that is complete nonsense. there are several liberal posters who constantly bring up romney's skin color, who constantly claim republicans don't like obama simply because he is black. the left on this board does it far more than the right. not even close.

here are some non jpp examples

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/18/opinion/racial-politics-2012-style.html

http://news.yahoo.com/racial-politics-redefined-2012-presidential-campaign-194200922.html

 
Back
Top