Poll: Mitt Romney's Support Among Black People Is 0%

Gosh it's almost as if blacks feel that Romney and the entire Republican establishment is engaging in a systemic attempt to strip them of their voting rights and keep them from the polls???

And after ya'll were so kind as to spend all that time white-splaining to them that it just wasn't so.

Fucking ungrateful man. Well, best get back to mansplaining rape and abortion maybe the bitches will learn something. It ain't easy being a white guy these days. So much splaining to do.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Only after numerous people told you repeatedly where to look.

You whined about the poll data not being in the article for most of page one.
Click to expand...

another lie....acknowledged after the first person, ekg, mentioned it and acknowledge after the second, and last, person, damo...mentioned it.

so lie #1 i acknowledge it right away; lie #2 numerous people did not repeatedly tell where to look, lie #3 i mentioned the poll data not being in the article 2 times...

you're pathetic. you have not once debated any actual points of this thread. all you've done is come in and attack me and lie.

you're dismissed troll.
 
enough said:
another lie....acknowledged after the first person, ekg, mentioned it and acknowledge after the second, and last, person, damo...mentioned it.

so lie #1 i acknowledge it right away; lie #2 numerous people did not repeatedly tell where to look, lie #3 i mentioned the poll data not being in the article 2 times...

you're pathetic. you have not once debated any actual points of this thread. all you've done is come in and attack me and lie.

you're dismissed troll.
Click to expand...


No proof...no corroboration...just more Yurt telling others how he supposedly isn't full of shit.

You're hilarious...you come in and whine about the poll data not being in the article...which it is.

Then you start in with the same tired bullshit grammatical semantic word games you just love to play when you've been cornered.

I keep telling you we could debate, but first you've got to learn how to compose a sentence that doesn't contain the standard complement of insults and vulgarities if you want debate from me.
 
enough said:
you said i claimed he was responsible, yet you can't cite the post.

interesting....
Click to expand...


enough said:
i looked....not there. but we see once again that nigel can't back up his claims, despite asking others to support data from a specific poll. hypocrite much? your title is bogus.
Click to expand...


right there..."your title" is bogus.

Not "The thread title is bogus..." but a personal assignation of responsibility from you.

Now everyone gather round and watch the Great Yurtskin begin another display of World Class Verbal Gymnastics in order to deny what he himself just said.
 
enough said:
and you could please cite the actual data from the actual poll that supports the OP. thanks.
Click to expand...


There's the FIRST time you deny the poll data is available in the article...


enough said:
i looked....not there. but we see once again that nigel can't back up his claims
Click to expand...


There you are AGAIN denying the poll data can be found in the body of the article...


enough said:
further, the poll results are NOT in the body of the article.
Click to expand...


Is the third time the charm? Not for Yurt...


enough said:
i can't find it the actual poll.
Click to expand...


That's a FOUR BAGGER folks...four times now Yurt claims he can't find the data...


enough said:
another lie....acknowledged after the first person, ekg, mentioned it and acknowledge after the second, and last, person, damo...mentioned it.

so lie #1 i acknowledge it right away; lie #2 numerous people did not repeatedly tell where to look, lie #3 i mentioned the poll data not being in the article 2 times...

you're pathetic. you have not once debated any actual points of this thread. all you've done is come in and attack me and lie.

you're dismissed troll.
Click to expand...

But of course that doesn't stop a lying coward like Yurt from trying to claim he found it the first time...Oh PUH-LEEZE!
 
Darla said:
Gosh it's almost as if blacks feel that Romney and the entire Republican establishment is engaging in a systemic attempt to strip them of their voting rights and keep them from the polls???

And after ya'll were so kind as to spend all that time white-splaining to them that it just wasn't so.

Fucking ungrateful man. Well, best get back to mansplaining rape and abortion maybe the bitches will learn something. It ain't easy being a white guy these days. So much splaining to do.
Click to expand...

Wow, more emotional outbursts from Darla... who would have thought that could happen.

96% of Blacks voted for Obama in 2008... now 94% support Obama... hmm....
 
ZappasGuitar said:
There's the FIRST time you deny the poll data is available in the article...





There you are AGAIN denying the poll data can be found in the body of the article...





Is the third time the charm? Not for Yurt...





That's a FOUR BAGGER folks...four times now Yurt claims he can't find the data...




But of course that doesn't stop a lying coward like Yurt from trying to claim he found it the first time...Oh PUH-LEEZE!
Click to expand...

you're a liar. you had to cut out my posts to dishonestly portray them. i never claimed i found the first time. wtf is your problem.

two of the quotes you posted about the ACTUAL 0% claim in the actual poll data, not that i couldn't find the poll in the article. you are such an embarrassment. fuck off.

i'm tired of your lies.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
right there..."your title" is bogus.

Not "The thread title is bogus..." but a personal assignation of responsibility from you.

Now everyone gather round and watch the Great Yurtskin begin another display of World Class Verbal Gymnastics in order to deny what he himself just said.
Click to expand...

My mistake!

I assumed Yurt would engage in his standard bullshit to deny he said what he clearly did, instead, Yurt has chosen the coward's way out and he's just going to ignore the proof right before his eyes.
 
Superfreak said:
No need for me to do so, you did quite a good job on your own...



Were you not quite bright enough to get the joke of my inclusion of an automatic for the game of roulette? It kind of guarantees a loss for the player.
Click to expand...

Nice try to save face Simplefreak.
 
enough said:
actually, i had already looked at the actual data and said so numerous times before your post. it was post 11. what insults are you whining about? and if i just want to insult, why was i discussing the thread topic? ooops....nice try.

you should really read more carefully and not jump in when you don't know what you're talking about.
Click to expand...

you started asking in post #5

enough said:
i
and you could please cite the actual data from the actual poll that supports the OP. thanks.
Click to expand...

you started whining and insulting immediately after that in post #8

enough said:
i looked....not there. but we see once again that nigel can't back up his claims, despite asking others to support data from a specific poll. hypocrite much? your title is bogus.
Click to expand...

you continued to ask for the poll and whine in post #11

enough said:
further, the poll results are NOT in the body of the article. that was my point. you quoted only the left wing news source, NOT the actual data from the actual poll. i had to go look up the actual poll and when i read it, could find nothing to support their assertion.

now...are you going to back up your claim with actual data or are you just going to rely on a news article? seems i recall you mocking others for doing the same.
Click to expand...

then you mocked me for showing the link you were demanding.. and 'groaned' me for saying I'm trying to learn about how they got their number and if we couldn't agree that the poll was in the article, then wtf was the discussion for? Just to insult people..


I read perfectly fine.. you did not say.. "numerous times before your(my) post" ..about having to look it up on your own, you said it once..

General and I weren't the only ones to give you the link..

Damocles said:
The link was in the story.

http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/MSNBC/S...y_Stories_Teases/August_NBC-WSJ_Int_Sched.pdf
Click to expand...

Damo gave it again...after you were still complaining.. in post #28

enough said:
0% is not 51.2 %. it would have been more accurate to say less than 1%. 0% has specific meaning and you should know this. have you read the actual poll to see if their claim is even valid? i can't find it the actual poll.
Click to expand...


Me giving you the link wasn't hilarious as you said... but the idea of you telling me I should read more carefully, after you were unable to read a link that was in the 3rd paragraph of the OP's article.. nor could you find it with 3 people telling you it was there, is. But you 'groaning' me for the link was just a dick move.. but that's on me since I'm still working out who is who and now I know who and what you are.. so there's that..

finally,

"if i just want to insult..."

actually the question is, if your goal wasn't to just insult and argue... then why have you yet to admit your error or apologize to those you insulted because of that error..? You told Zappa you acknowledged the link.. No, you attacked General for telling you where it was then mocked me for pointing it out to you in red, then still claimed you couldn't find it.. But you never said anything close to "Oops, my bad General.. I fucked up, wasn't looking, sorry for giving you a hard time. Now can you tell me how they came to 0% because I still can't see it".. which would have been the adult and non-argumentative thing to do..

Look, I don't care one way or the other.. you asked repeated for the link.. you were given it and then continued to attack and claim to not be able to find the information.. whatever, such is life.. at some point tho you can't be surprised when people stop trying to answer you demands when all they get is an asshole reply back to them..
 
ekg said:
you started asking in post #5



you started whining and insulting immediately after that in post #8



you continued to ask for the poll and whine in post #11



then you mocked me for showing the link you were demanding.. and 'groaned' me for saying I'm trying to learn about how they got their number and if we couldn't agree that the poll was in the article, then wtf was the discussion for? Just to insult people..


I read perfectly fine.. you did not say.. "numerous times before your(my) post" ..about having to look it up on your own, you said it once..

General and I weren't the only ones to give you the link..



Damo gave it again...after you were still complaining.. in post #28




Me giving you the link wasn't hilarious as you said... but the idea of you telling me I should read more carefully, after you were unable to read a link that was in the 3rd paragraph of the OP's article.. nor could you find it with 3 people telling you it was there, is. But you 'groaning' me for the link was just a dick move.. but that's on me since I'm still working out who is who and now I know who and what you are.. so there's that..

finally,

"if i just want to insult..."

actually the question is, if your goal wasn't to just insult and argue... then why have you yet to admit your error or apologize to those you insulted because of that error..? You told Zappa you acknowledged the link.. No, you attacked General for telling you where it was then mocked me for pointing it out to you in red, then still claimed you couldn't find it.. But you never said anything close to "Oops, my bad General.. I fucked up, wasn't looking, sorry for giving you a hard time. Now can you tell me how they came to 0% because I still can't see it".. which would have been the adult and non-argumentative thing to do..

Look, I don't care one way or the other.. you asked repeated for the link.. you were given it and then continued to attack and claim to not be able to find the information.. whatever, such is life.. at some point tho you can't be surprised when people stop trying to answer you demands when all they get is an asshole reply back to them..
Click to expand...

wtf?

get off the meds. you make zero sense. i have no idea how you and zappa can spend so much time on personal stuff and ignore the actual topic.

FACT: i asked for a link twice and in post 11 talked about the actual link and didn't ask for it again. you and zappa wouldn't the truth if it hit you on the head. you're and him are two peas in a pod. you spend all this time whining about me and avoiding the topic.

carry on.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
right there..."your title" is bogus.

Not "The thread title is bogus..." but a personal assignation of responsibility from you.

Now everyone gather round and watch the Great Yurtskin begin another display of World Class Verbal Gymnastics in order to deny what he himself just said.
Click to expand...


STILL refuse to answer the very straightforward question?

You asked for cites and in post #56 I provided them.

Now why would Yurt be too scared to answer a question about something HE said?

Because he can't find a way to wriggle out of admitting he's been nothing but a two-faced liar, that's why...
 
your question has been asked and answered. now...do you have anything to say about the OP or are you just going to stalk me and make another thread about me?
 
enough said:
the angry man is frothing again. what the angry man fails to state is that he claimed i lied in the title. the difference here is i merely said nigel's title is bogus, not that he lied or created it, something zappa accused me of doing when i merely copied the title.

poor angry man...all pissed and pounding on the keyboard
Click to expand...

there is your answer angry man. you even quoted that post. now...can you stop obsessing about me?
 
enough said:
there is your answer angry man. you even quoted that post. now...can you stop obsessing about me?
Click to expand...


Oh well then, please tell everyone your definition of "bogus".

Here's what those with a brain say about "bogus"...

bo·gus/ˈbōgəs/

Adjective:
Not genuine or true; fake.

Synonyms:
false - spurious - counterfeit - sham - dummy - mock


Y-O-U aqssigned ownership of the title with the words "your title" and we now know the word bogus is a synonym of "false" which is just another word for LIE...

In other words, you claimed HIS thread title is a LIE.

Will you EVER debate me with ANY honesty, or are lies all you truly have?
 
Black people vote for Obama only because he's black like them???

Let's test that theory and look at the historical record shall we?

How did blacks vote when like Bill Clinton ran?

In 1992, Clinton got 82% of the black vote
In 1996, Clinton got 84% of the black vote

If Obama is now getting 94% of the black vote .. then the case can only be made that no more 10% of blacks are voting for him because he's black. However, even in that analysis, the level of trust blacks have in the opposition must be considered. Both Bush (10%) and Dole (12%) were both more trusted within the black community than is Mitt Romney .. especially after his sad ass staged performance at the NAACP conference.

But that's only if you use Bill Clinton .. the so-called "first Black president."

In 2004, Al Gore won NINETY-PERCENT of the black vote. Nobody ever called him "black" anything .. yet he got a higher percentage than Clinton.

So it looks like ony 4% of blacks are for for Obama because he's black.

In 2008, even lackluster John Kerry won 88% of the black vote.

AND, if Hillary Clinton had run, or does run, is there anyone who doesn't think she'll carry Obama-like numbers of the black vote?

In other words, this entire premise is flawed by half-truths.

The reality is that blacks don't like nor vote for republicans .. for a very good reason.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top