Supercandy afraid of reality puts those who speak truth on Ignore...zygote not child!

Why aren't you and your party going after fertility clinics? You ought to direct your energy towards those 'killers', don't you think? They kill waaaaay more 'babies' each year than individual women do.

you realize that we object to those embryos being destroyed, right?....we also object to embryonic stem cell research......the reason is the same for all three....or were you too stupid to realize that?......
now, do you actually have an argument that this is leading up to or are you just thrashing about in the water?....
 
Yes, retard. That's exactly how it works.

I take it you're used to posting on boards where there are no people who disagree with you......it must be hard for you to cope with real life....here, if she can't back it up we chalk it up as another liberal lie.....
 
you realize that we object to those embryos being destroyed, right?....we also object to embryonic stem cell research......the reason is the same for all three....or were you too stupid to realize that?......
now, do you actually have an argument that this is leading up to or are you just thrashing about in the water?....

No, retard. Your argument isn't the same at all. You hide beyond the 'stem cell research' and stay mum on on the incineration of embryos. Apparently, to 'tards like you and the rest of your retarded party, it's okay to kill embryos that were 'meant' to be babies - but not okay to kill them via their use in stem cell research. Some whackjob nonsense about 'harvesting' fore eee-vil science.

If your fight were really about life-and-death, your focus would be on shutting down fertility clinics, your christ-y whacko outliers from your party would be gunning down fertility clinic doctors a la Dr. Tiller. Your crap is hopelessly transparent. It's about being a mouth-breathing control freak and nothing more.
 
I take it you're used to posting on boards where there are no people who disagree with you......it must be hard for you to cope with real life....here, if she can't back it up we chalk it up as another liberal lie.....

When one disagrees, they post proof as to why. Something you're unfamiliar with, apparently. Some other 'tard at Special Ed taught you that mumbling and dots make you sound smarter.

Don't worry, moron. No one expects you to refute Darla's claim. If you could've, you already would have.
 
except I'm not mum on the incineration of embryos.....doesn't that sort of fuck up your argument?.....

Other than 'I don't like it', yes you are. And so is your retarded party, retard. Probably because many of the 'family values' crowd who can't conceive on their own have utilized them. Ooops.
 
It missrepresents the position of those who oppose abortion. These are deep seated and often religious convictions. Yes some politicians manipulate that for political purposes but that's not why large numbers of people oppose abortion, so that they can manipulate the issue to gain political powers. I also think it's innappropriate to question their motives.
 
Now you are reacting the same way that Darla might react, I am trying to give some insight into a world of which you know little. Do you really think that if legal abortion wasn't available that those women would just say, oh fair enough then I'll have the baby. No, they won't they will go to some woman down a backstreet and resort to knitting needles.

No, I am trying to understand your 'logic'. The fact that their lives may be tough is completely irrelevant. Yes, abortions are more than likely going to take place despite it being illegal. did you happen to watch the videos Tom? That video should be shown in every health class in Ohio so that kids understand the consequences of having an abortion. It should be used in conjunction with sex ed instruction on birth control.
 
It is not a strawman Mott... there is already a thread on it where the left on the board is doing just that. Saying that the pro-life people are full of it because Reps want to cut food stamps.
I'm sorry SF but characterizing all those who support pro-choice by the comments of a few individuals on this board is a strawman.
 
http://scottthong.wordpress.com/200...sound-video-of-a-baby-being-brutally-aborted/

For all you pro-abortionists out there... I challenge you to watch the ultrasound of an abortion at 11 weeks. Then come back on here and try to justify that 'choice'.

We all know Darla won't... will the rest of you?

you would get the same reaction from squashing a mouse.

A fly tries to get away from me when I swat it. It still has very lower brain power. It's life, but it's meaningless life.

sorry superfreak, but I am inclined to make fetus soup. yum yum yum.

I'll be sure to name my future aborted child after you though.
 
I'm sorry SF but characterizing all those who support pro-choice by the comments of a few individuals on this board is a strawman.

Oh, so you are simply incapable of reading and comprehending. I did not state that EVERYONE who is pro choice would do so. I stated the left... I was referring to those on this board. I further clarified that by pointing out that they already had done precisely what I stated. So either read and comprehend or go back to your sheep.
 
So to be morally consistant you would agree that all wars should be illegal?

except that is bullshit... it is not morally consistent.

SOME war may fall into that category, but not all war.

You would be morally consistent to protect innocent lives. Bosnia is a perfect example of such. Somalia, the Sudan, Rwanda etc... all also would have been morally consistent. Protecting innocent lives.
 
you would get the same reaction from squashing a mouse.

A fly tries to get away from me when I swat it. It still has very lower brain power. It's life, but it's meaningless life.

sorry superfreak, but I am inclined to make fetus soup. yum yum yum.

I'll be sure to name my future aborted child after you though.

trolling at its finest
 
and provided you a link proving it.....a link you didn't respond to, but ran away......what does that demonstrate about you?....
It demonstrates that his sources are superior to yours. The brain begins developing from the 4th pair of somites on the neural tube into the three primary brain vesicles in the 4th week of development. This is NOT the same thing as having a brain. The brain continues development adding more folds of nueral tissue and developing many of the structures we're familiar with such as, cerebral cortex, retina, thalamus, hypthalamus, pons, cerebrum, cerebellum, after the 20th week (4.5 months) until birth (40th week). This is also about the time (20th week) that that nuerones begin connecting with other neurones to form synaptic connections. With out synaptic connections there is no brain function, so the protobrain of fetal development doesn't occur until midway through fetal development (20th week) and continues well beyond birth.

So either your sources suck or you simply don't understand what you are reading.
 
He did? Seriously? LOL

I tried to tell him that the brain stem is not the same as the brain proper, I likened it to a router in a data network compared to the real brain which is a server without an operating system until around the 26th week. Unfortunately his own OS is like Windows Vista in that it is bloated, slow and crashes a lot!!
 
you would get the same reaction from squashing a mouse.

A fly tries to get away from me when I swat it. It still has very lower brain power. It's life, but it's meaningless life.

sorry superfreak, but I am inclined to make fetus soup. yum yum yum.

I'll be sure to name my future aborted child after you though.
I tried placenta soup once. To be honest with you it was pretty fucking gross.
 
Back
Top