pr strongly opposes stimulus plan but requests stimulus cash for his district

I have no problem with politicians that opposed the stimulus requesting that the stimulus funds be spent in their state/district once the stimulus passed. They'd be fools not to and wouldn't be doing their jobs if they didn't. This also applies to earmarks.

However, lying about requesting stimulus funds (or conveniently not remembering) is a whole 'nother can of worms altogether.
 
Not for one of these slimy toads. Lying is natural, comes easily and will be repeated often. I've never seen anything this bad before (other than Palin and some of the other off the grid crazyassed Tbagger candidates) Romney still refuses to release his tax returns and calls anyone who wants him to 'small minded'. So much for what he thinks of the voters eh?
 
http://articles.boston.com/2012-08-...stimulus-funds-energy-efficiency-energy-costs
In 2009, as Rep. Paul D. Ryan was railing against President Obama’s $787 billion stimulus package as a “wasteful spending spree,” he wrote at least four letters to Obama’s secretary of energy asking that millions of dollars from the program be granted to a pair of Wisconsin conservation groups, according to documents obtained by the Globe.

The advocacy appeared to pay off; both groups were awarded the economic recovery funds -- one receiving a $20 million grant to help thousands of local businesses and homes improve their energy efficiency, agency documents show.

Ryan’s letters to the energy secretary praising the energy initiatives as he sought a portion of the funding are in sharp contrast to the House Budget Committee chairman’s image as a Tea Party favorite adamantly opposed to federal spending on such programs.

The documents show that Ryan’s attempts to take advantage of the stimulus funds even after he voted against them was more expansive than previously reported. Ryan was criticized by some House Democrats in 2010 after the Wall Street Journal reported that he was among several Republicans lawmakers who sought the stimulus money for their constituents by, in his case, writing a letter in 2010 to the Department of Labor.

The additional letters include his praise for the energy program’s aims, and clash with his own budget priorities, which call for curtailing many of the same Department of Energy investments that are designed to spur the growth of green technologies and reduce reliance on fossil fuels..

“I was pleased that the primary objectives of their project will allow residents and businesses in the partner cities to reduce their energy costs, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and stimulate the local economy by creating new jobs,” Ryan wrote to Energy Secretary Steven Chu on December 18, 2009, on behalf of the Wisconsin Energy Conservation Corporation.
 
I was pleased that the primary objectives of their project will allow residents and businesses in the partner cities to reduce their energy costs, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and stimulate the local economy by creating new jobs,” Ryan wrote to Energy Secretary Steven Chu on December 18, 2009, on behalf of the Wisconsin Energy Conservation Corporation.

Everything he publicly railed against and said wouldn't happen.
 
I have no problem with politicians that opposed the stimulus requesting that the stimulus funds be spent in their state/district once the stimulus passed. They'd be fools not to and wouldn't be doing their jobs if they didn't. This also applies to earmarks.

However, lying about requesting stimulus funds (or conveniently not remembering) is a whole 'nother can of worms altogether.

Well, then. ;)
 
i am not sure i really believe ryan's claim of not remembering and comparing to other standard requests. this is something he has said he didn't do several years ago, it is not like this is the first time he was asked. plus, if he is signing documents of this import and can't remember doing so, that is another problem.
 
Back
Top