OBAMA’S COLLEGE CLASSMATE: ‘THE OBAMA SCANDAL IS AT COLUMBIA’

Yes, transparency but not divulging sensitive information. We know the government ran F & F. We know they got Bin Laden. Are we to expect they divulge the intimate details of each? Does the death of one civilian justify jeopardizing foreign relations? And then there's the spin the Repubs would put on it and distract from the important things to be discussed during election time.

The Obama admin leaked info on the US covertly attacking Iran via cyberattacks, Mexico already knows the Obama admin authorized gun smuggling across their borders and that the guns were used in the deaths of not only a US Agent, but also hundreds of Mexican civilians. But yeah, you are right, we should hide the truth because the truth might damage foreign relations.
 
The Obama admin leaked info on the US covertly attacking Iran via cyberattacks, Mexico already knows the Obama admin authorized gun smuggling across their borders and that the guns were used in the deaths of not only a US Agent, but also hundreds of Mexican civilians. But yeah, you are right, we should hide the truth because the truth might damage foreign relations.

It was pretty obvious to anyone with even a semblance of intelligence that the Stuxnet virus could only come from a government like the US or Israel. The Iranians are not idiots.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-12633240
 
I guess we won't know if they're legal or not until he releases his returns, huh?

wrong... you forget the little thing called the IRS... you know, that government agency that had to 'remind' many Dems to pay their taxes?

The only reason the left wants him to release his returns is so that they can cherry pick his investments and further lie/distort/distract the public from Obama's miserable economic recovery.
 
wrong... you forget the little thing called the IRS... you know, that government agency that had to 'remind' many Dems to pay their taxes?

How did those tax issues for political appointees come to light many years after the subject tax returns were filed?


The only reason the left wants him to release his returns is so that they can cherry pick his investments and further lie/distort/distract the public from Obama's miserable economic recovery.

The main reason I want him to release his taxes is to see how much he paid as compared to how much he earned. That's what the issue is really all about. Romney's investments are pretty much all already know unless he lied (or simply forgot to include them, like that Swiss bank account) on his financial disclosures.
 
How did those tax issues for political appointees come to light many years after the subject tax returns were filed?




The main reason I want him to release his taxes is to see how much he paid as compared to how much he earned. That's what the issue is really all about. Romney's investments are pretty much all already know unless he lied (or simply forgot to include them, like that Swiss bank account) on his financial disclosures.

What, if anything, do you expect to be different from say his '07/'08 tax returns than what you'll see in his '10/'11 tax returns?
 
What, if anything, do you expect to be different from say his '07/'08 tax returns than what you'll see in his '10/'11 tax returns?

I think it is highly likely that Romney had virtually no taxable income in those years notwithstanding that he received tens of millions of dollars in compensation for his shares of the Bain management company. The shares were sold over a 10 year period beginning (retroactive, mind you) in 1999. The 2010 and 2011 returns would not reflect these transactions or how they were treated for tax purposes.

It's this transaction (or series of transactions) that Reid is referring to when he says that Romney didn't pay taxes for ten years.
 
I think it is highly likely that Romney had virtually no taxable income in those years notwithstanding that he received tens of millions of dollars in compensation for his shares of the Bain management company. The shares were sold over a 10 year period beginning (retroactive, mind you) in 1999. The 2010 and 2011 returns would not reflect these transactions or how they were treated for tax purposes.

It's this transaction (or series of transactions) that Reid is referring to when he says that Romney didn't pay taxes for ten years.

Please link us up to where you got that information....
 
No link. Allow me to rephrase: I believe it is this transaction (or series of transactions) that Reid is referring to when he says that Romney didn't pay taxes for ten years.

thought so... like Reid, you were pulling shit out of your ass and flinging it. Good Monkey... is that an upgrade or downgrade from party parrot?
 
I think it's hilarious that you with a straight face can spew off about this, knowing the hacks that your leftie sites are, yet have the gall to criticize my use of different web sites on the right....Sol Alinsky lives. In any case, I am going to show exactly why these sites are not credible, and should be mocked and scoffed at every turn. Fogbow is no exception, with its dis barred, dis credited founder Bill Bryan, and his dailyKOS rejects. They are thugs, and hacks, and shouldn't be given the time of day. But that'll come later. Now, I must go to work, then compile my research, and when I get done with you Bijou, you'll know that your anger driven Bull Shit is exposed. So, enjoy, while you still can without shame.

Calling them thugs and hacks with nothing but elevated blood pressure is meaningless j-mac. Demonstrate how they are hugs and hacks, with cited proof of it, and not YET ANOTHER blogged opinion by one of your favored partisan hacks. If you can't demonstrate with actual prove of how they're thugs and hacks, quit sniveling. Easy-peasy. And you're gonna do that later, right? :D
 
No link. Allow me to rephrase: I believe it is this transaction (or series of transactions) that Reid is referring to when he says that Romney didn't pay taxes for ten years.

I don't know about no tax but it is pretty certain that he paid no more than 15%.

How much tax has Romney paid on all the money he made at Bain Capital?


That is another question that has yet to be answered. Romney hasn’t released any of his recent tax returns. A front-page story in the Times last month, by Nicholas Confessore, Christopher Drew, and Julie Creswell, revealed that, although he left Bain Capital in 1999, his retirement agreement entitled him to share in the profits that the firm made on all of its deals through 2009. And the story noted, “Much of his income from this arrangement has probably qualified for a lower tax rate than ordinary income under a tax provision favorable to hedge fund and private equity managers, which has become a point of contention in the battle over economic inequality.”
That “probably” is probably superfluous. Managers of private-equity funds, even retired ones like Romney, routinely class much of the income they receive as “carried interest,” which is taxed at just fifteen per cent—compared to a top rate of income tax of thirty-five per cent. Billionaire private-equity moguls like Kravis and multi-multi-millionaire private-equity moguls like Romney have presumably been exploiting this loophole for years. If and when Romney publishes his tax returns, outside experts will be able to figure out how much he has saved in recent years, and whether, as some suspect, the effective federal tax rate he paid was lower than the rate that many middle-income workers pay.

http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/johncassidy/2012/01/bain-capital-a-users-guide.html
 
Calling them thugs and hacks with nothing but elevated blood pressure is meaningless j-mac. Demonstrate how they are hugs and hacks, with cited proof of it, and not YET ANOTHER blogged opinion by one of your favored partisan hacks. Or quit sniveling. Easy-peasy. And you're gonna do that later, right? :D
Oh but his going to, he'll expose them...... later ..... right? .... I'm not holding my breath.
 
thought so... like Reid, you were pulling shit out of your ass and flinging it. Good Monkey... is that an upgrade or downgrade from party parrot?


Hilarious. By the way, you haven't answered my question about the tax problems of Democratic political appointees. How did those issues come to light?
 
Back
Top