zappasguitar
Well-known member
Then kindly show all of us precisely where in the Bible it says God says it is alright for Christians to refuse to allow members of their church to be married just because they are black, is acceptable.
pastor has to marry a black couple at another church
- Thread starter Don Quixote
- Start date
Then kindly show all of us precisely where in the Bible it says God says it is alright for Christians to refuse to allow members of their church to be married just because they are black, is acceptable.
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
there is a difference between no and zero? good lord. seriously? fine...."no racism"....tell me how that is different than zero racism?
let us cite his words again:
Of course, nothing magically changed when Obama was declared president-elect. However, our proper concern is not whether racism still exists, but whether it remains a serious problem. The election of Obama proved, as nothing else could have, that it no longer does.
I make that claim while quite sure that in 2009, a noose or three will be hung somewhere, some employer will be revealed to have used the N-word on tapes of a meeting, and so on. America will remain imperfect, as humans have always been.
you're twisting his words. he flat out says racism will still exist.
Good grief man. Give it up.
"Is America past racism against black people," I say the answer is yes.
Twisting his words? Are those my words or his .. or according to you .. hers?
End of story.
Suggesting that it's not a serious problem is stupid.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
nice dodge of your bullshit claim that i'm dishonest for saying zero, instead of no. you want to dishonestly characterize what he actually said. even explains what he means by no racism, but you just want to bury your head in the sand and pretend he meant something else. you want to dishonestly ignore that he said there would still be nooses, n***ger insults etc....you want to ignore that he meant no racism means it is not a serious problem.
if you think it is stupid, why did you cite the article as your proof?
if you think it is stupid, why did you cite the article as your proof?
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
hopefully people will be more open and honest about christianity than you and zappa. they will realize that this has nothing to with christianity and realize that it has all to do with this one racist idiot. you do realize another christian church married them? right? oooooops....funny how you ignore that aspect of the story.
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
No wonder people think you're a racist.
You think nooses and the "N" word are the only products of racism.
I cited the article because you said no one has said racism was over.
"Is America past racism against black people," I say the answer is yes.
Now you want to change your claim with a super goofus claim that it's not a serious problem.
I'm real sure that it isn't a serious problem for you.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
i seriously have no clue what your problem is today. you've lied about me twice now. you still run away from your bullshit claim that zero is different than no racism.
now, as to your second bullshit claim that "no wonder people think i'm a racist" because i said nooses and the n word "are the only products of racism." 1. i never said that, ever. 2. i cited the examples the author of the article - that YOU cited - gave; 3. i put ETC after the two examples. i would hope you apologize for your lies.
you keep focusing on those words while ignoring his explanation of those words. if you want to continue to lie and be dishonest about what people say, and think that zero racism is different than no racism.....have at it. your bullshit is tiring.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
and BAC.... that is not a serious problem is NOT MY CLAIM.....that is the claim from YOUR ARTICLE
what the frack is wrong with you?
what the frack is wrong with you?
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
I have no idea what your point is supposed to be.
I don't agree with the article or you. I posted it because if the uber stupid claims made in it .. that you said didn't exist.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
so his saying there will still be racism....means there will be no racism
so his claim now somehow becomes my claim. you lied 3 times in this thread and have no apologized once.
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
They were words that YOU said no one has said .. now you want to claim HE didn't mean what he said. His explanation is meaningless.. demonstrated by his claim that the absence of nooses and the "N" word .. which still gets said .. means that racism is unimportant.
How stupid is that?
Your bullshit is dishonest.
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
so his saying there will still be racism....means there will be no racism
so his claim now somehow becomes my claim. you lied 3 times in this thread and have no apologized once.
And I'm not going to apologize to someone who can't interpret simple english.
Racism is over .. so sayeth the author. His dumb ass explanation for his dumb ass words are meaningless.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
LOL. you're on something today BAC. you're pissed off at me for what this guy said. you're in such a tizzy you've lied about me 3 times. you can't even address your idiotic claim that zero racism is different than no racism.
you obviously have dug your heels in here and won't see the truth. you flat out admit he states that racism will still exists, and in the same breath stick to his words that racism won't exist....when he clearly explained that he meant racism will no longer be a serious problem. i think his logic ridiculous as well.
you should have cited something that actually supported your claim.
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
I did post exactly what supported my claim and destroyed yours.
Did you or did you not say that no one has said racism is over?
Did HE say racism is over?
Are you even honest enough for a simple question?
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
tell me....what did he mean by his statement? did he actually mean that there would be no racism? yes or no. simple question.
why are you still running away from your claim that zero racism is different than no racism? you even called me dishonest over that. you're tweaked.
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
Did you or did you not say that no one has said racism is over?
Did HE say racism is over?
There is a pattern here brother .. and you exhibit that same pattern in other threads.
Are you even honest enough for a simple question?
I guess that answer is no.
zappasguitar
Well-known member
Welcome to what passes for "civil debate" from Yurt.
"Civil debate" means he doesn't have to answer any of your questions, but you must answer every single one he asks.
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
Therein lies the pattern I speak of.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
how many times do i have to tell you
YES HE SAID THOSE WORDS - WHY THE FRACK DO YOU THINK I KEEP TALKING ABOUT HIS WORDS AND ASKING YOU WHAT HE MEANT
fuck dude. you're demented today. now....tell me....what exactly did he MEAN by those words?
btw....thanks for being an asshole and not apologizing for your lies.
YES HE SAID THOSE WORDS - WHY THE FRACK DO YOU THINK I KEEP TALKING ABOUT HIS WORDS AND ASKING YOU WHAT HE MEANT
fuck dude. you're demented today. now....tell me....what exactly did he MEAN by those words?
btw....thanks for being an asshole and not apologizing for your lies.
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
Dude .. your argument is demented beyond belief. Your argument is that no one has said racism is over .. which is mindless. If you at least have the honesty to recognize that RACISTS exist .. then why wouldn't they say it?
Of course at this point, I'm not sure you even possess that meager amount of honesty to even acknowledge that RACISTS do exist .. given that you didn't even have to honesty to acknowledge your own words.
You are the asshole with an argument so monumentally stupid that you run from it.
Thanks for playing.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
i said i have never heard it, nor read it. it isn't an argument, it is a statement of fact. i merely asked for a cite showing where someone said it. you're delusional and on something today.
you're a prick. i answer your question - again - and you don't have the temerity to answer mine. and yet you just called me dishonest for allegedly not answering your question. you have run away from nearly all my questions in this thread. then you have the fucking nerve to claim i don't have the honesty to admit that racists do exist....which is the dumbest thing in the world, because if i didn't think racists exist....why would i believe racism still exists?
you are a two faced monumental prick. you didn't even play, you ran away from the tough questions. keep running, you'll just get tired.