It is a nightmare for OWEdummyasshole

canceled.2021.1

#AMERICAISDEAD
Not much for math, are you?

Strong Democrat ............................................... 24 Not very strong Democrat ................................. 11 Independent/lean Democrat .............................. 11 Strictly Independent .......................................... 16 Independent/lean Republican............................ 12 Not very strong Republican ............................... 7 Strong Republican............................................. 16 Other (VOL)....................................................... 2
Not sure........................................................... 1 + Results shown reflect responses among registered voter

Here is the voter breakdown. Now add up Strong Democrat, Not very strong democrats and Independent/Lean democrat and you get 46

Add up Strong Republican, Not very strong republican and Independent/Lean Republican and you get 35

46-35 = 11

You are a dumb fuck. No go put some ice on that face. That was a serious bitch slapping you just took
 
LOL - they're talking about the sampling %'s of those polled. That doesn't equate into %'s of the poll results.

Good stuff...
 
LOL - they're talking about the sampling %'s of those polled. That doesn't equate into %'s of the poll results.

Good stuff...

OK, I will mark you down as being too stupid to know how polling is done. So you don't think that oversampling will skew the results? Really?

You are sweet puddin
 
I'm still confused as how this poll is a nightmare for Obama.

The obvious truth is that it isn't.

Then I will mark you down as just as stupid and detached from reality as Onceler.

I will attempt to explain it to you once. If you don't get it then it is up to you and you will be left to scream "VOTER FRAUD" on election day when Romney wins in a landslide and you keep looking back to these polls wondering WTF happened

1) It has been proven that sampling registered voters and adults ALWAYS skews a study toward the democrats.
2) Credible polling only looks at LIKELY voters and have been proven time and time again to be more accurate
3) It is a given that the country is evenly divided among those who call themselves democrat/republican. Going back to the 2008 election the self identified democrats led self identified GOP by 7 points.
4) The last time it was 11 was after Watergate.
5) This poll is using a sample MASSIVELY tilted toward those with a predilection toward OWEdummy
6) When sampling in either a poll or a clinical trial, you want to get a REPRESENTATIVE sample so that your results can be considered accurate. This is not a representative sample of the country
7) Even with massively oversampling demalquedacrats AND looking at registered voters, they could only get a 6 point lead for OWEbama. His lead should be over 10 and he should be over 50%. This is a devastating poll for him.

Only if you are stupid and don't understand statistical sampling or if you are a OWEdummy dick sucker will you believe that this poll is a good thing for OWEdummy. Fine with me. THat will make Novermber all the more sweet when he gets his ass kicked ou
 
Then I will mark you down as just as stupid and detached from reality as Onceler.

I will attempt to explain it to you once. If you don't get it then it is up to you and you will be left to scream "VOTER FRAUD" on election day when Romney wins in a landslide and you keep looking back to these polls wondering WTF happened

1) It has been proven that sampling registered voters and adults ALWAYS skews a study toward the democrats.
2) Credible polling only looks at LIKELY voters and have been proven time and time again to be more accurate
3) It is a given that the country is evenly divided among those who call themselves democrat/republican. Going back to the 2008 election the self identified democrats led self identified GOP by 7 points.
4) The last time it was 11 was after Watergate.
5) This poll is using a sample MASSIVELY tilted toward those with a predilection toward OWEdummy
6) When sampling in either a poll or a clinical trial, you want to get a REPRESENTATIVE sample so that your results can be considered accurate. This is not a representative sample of the country
7) Even with massively oversampling demalquedacrats AND looking at registered voters, they could only get a 6 point lead for OWEbama. His lead should be over 10 and he should be over 50%. This is a devastating poll for him.

Only if you are stupid and don't understand statistical sampling or if you are a OWEdummy dick sucker will you believe that this poll is a good thing for OWEdummy. Fine with me. THat will make Novermber all the more sweet when he gets his ass kicked ou

:0)

Think about that for a second.

What in the fuck difference does it make what you write me down as? :0)

You're a fucking moron who writes like a teenager. :0)
 
:0)

Think about that for a second.

What in the fuck difference does it make what you write me down as? :0)

You're a fucking moron who writes like a teenager. :0)

For someone who doesn't understand basic statistical sampling to call another a moron is a pretty big stretch. Considering you claimed to have worked in Congress, I would assume that you would understand polling. But, alas, I was wrong. You are stupid.

And you do care what I think about you. :)
 
For someone who doesn't understand basic statistical sampling to call another a moron is a pretty big stretch. Considering you claimed to have worked in Congress, I would assume that you would understand polling. But, alas, I was wrong. You are stupid.

And you do care what I think about you. :)

Oh really? You mean we're like friends?

Ok, since you're my friend, let me help you out.

It doesn't matter what the sampling was or the results of the poll are. There is nothing remotely frightening about it.

Revise the sampling % and tell what the results would be with your revised sampling. Feel free to use a calculator. :0)

Does it demonstrate a huge lead or any lead at all for Romney?

Have you seen polls with huge leads for Romney that are validated by other like polls?

How about NO and NO?

What is obvious however is that you listened to Rush and you ran here to post his golden drug-addicted thoughts .. while adding in your own brand of school-child speak with gems like "OWEdummy" and "demalquedacrats" :0)

Priceless :0)
 
What is obvious however is that you listened to Rush and you ran here to post his golden drug-addicted thoughts ..
Priceless :0)

Oh goodness no. I would never be friends with someone like you. I am much more selective. I have discriminating tastes.

As for your last comment, you appear to be pretty ignorant. You see, the poll came out today. Rush isn't on until noon EST and I posted it at 9:45am. How sad for you that you reach for that worn out line of "you got it from Rush" only to have your face reddened by a big hand print from me.

EPIC FAIL!
 
Oh goodness no. I would never be friends with someone like you. I am much more selective. I have discriminating tastes.

As for your last comment, you appear to be pretty ignorant. You see, the poll came out today. Rush isn't on until noon EST and I posted it at 9:45am. How sad for you that you reach for that worn out line of "you got it from Rush" only to have your face reddened by a big hand print from me.

EPIC FAIL!

:0):0):0) Yet you continue to post to me even though you know I know that you're a moron .. and everytime you do you prove that you're a moron.

You didn't really believe I think you're a friend did you?

You're a teenager in an adult's head.

Go here .. www.Bieberworld.com

:0)
 
:0):0):0) Yet you continue to post to me even though you know I know that you're a moron .. and everytime you do you prove that you're a moron.

You didn't really believe I think you're a friend did you?

You're a teenager in an adult's head.

Go here .. www.Bieberworld.com

:0)

I post to a lot of people puddin. I would say I was smarter than you, but you aren't that smart, so it wouldn't be saying much. I did prove that you are a hypocrite who talks the talk but refuses to walk the walk. That has angered you, so you lash out. I completely understand. I have seen your type before. Once you have your worldview challenged, you start lashing out
 
I post to a lot of people puddin. I would say I was smarter than you, but you aren't that smart, so it wouldn't be saying much. I did prove that you are a hypocrite who talks the talk but refuses to walk the walk. That has angered you, so you lash out. I completely understand. I have seen your type before. Once you have your worldview challenged, you start lashing out

:0)

eddie_murphy_wtf_gif.gif
 
Back
Top