The Hero Zimmerman is now a Confirmed truth teller. He passed a lie detector test

Well then go ahead and refute the content, bible-thumper. Shouldn't be too tough to prove MSNBC's lying. Right?
They're trying to lead us along, you whore. Do you understand what it means to lead viewers along? These dick heads are long on specualtion and short on facts. Zimmerman is innocent until proven guilty. You racist perverts seem to think it's the other way around.
 
Last edited:
Good luck...don't hold your breath.

I've been waiting for WEEKS for that clown to finally back up his lunacy that gay marriage will destroy the sanctity of hetero marriage.

So far I've gotten exactly jack squat from him.
You got more than you deserved, droop eye.
 
Grind, as you've already observed, liberals do not give a flying fuck about the truth. It has been obvious from the beginning that Zimmerman was telling the truth. His injuries reflected it. However, try telling that to the rabid race-baiters thirsty for blood. They will not rest until Zimmerman is six feet under.
 
Grind, thank you for posting this, but since when do liberals give a flying fuck about the truth? It has been obvious from the beginning that Zimmerman was telling the truth. His injuries reflected it. However, try telling that to the rabid race-baiters thirsty for blood. They will not rest until Zimmerman is six feet under.

Ahahahahah, ridiculous.
 
Passing a polygraph is no indicator of truthfulness.

I learned techniques early on in life that allow one to essentially fool the polygraph machine.
He didn't even take a polygraph.

That's the point that Cest la vie simply cannot run and hide from.

Funny how USA today didn't mention that the 'test' that was administered, isn't even recognized as being credible.
 
He didn't even take a polygraph.

That's the point that Cest la vie simply cannot run and hide from.

Funny how USA today didn't mention that the 'test' that was administered, isn't even recognized as being credible.

Stop, you're muddling the issue with facts. :D
 
MSNBC is not a trustworthy source. Especially when a liberal racist is parroting their filth.
Are you denying that he took a voice stress analysis test?

Are you attempting to refute the agency's findings as to the reliability?
 
Are you denying that he took a voice stress analysis test?

Are you attempting to refute the agency's findings as to the reliability?

No the liberal left moonbats just want to ignore anythinig and everything that doesn't mesh with their initial calls for his head.
Now they're claiming that they just want a trial, so they can know the truth.
 
No the liberal left moonbats just want to ignore anythinig and everything that doesn't mesh with their initial calls for his head.
Now they're claiming that they just want a trial, so they can know the truth.
Pretty sure a liberal didn't start a thread with misinformation re. a fantasy 'lie detector' test.
 
It really is, huh. Cons were telling us not to judge the guy before he had a trial, now here's a thread calling GZ a hero and a post saying it's obvious he was telling the truth.

There is much more evidence pointing to zimmermans innocence than guilt. Everything has lined up so far with his story.

But what is really flying over your head, and what you are failing to understand, is that I am reflecting back exactly at you and your kind the same stuff that you put out, except I am doing it from a higher ground, with actual evidence, (not conjecture or inference or feelings) with a system that ASSUMES innocence, where tie goes to the defendant.

Witnesses support his testimony
Him passing a lie detector test backs up everything he has already said.
He received multiple head injuries (which everyone denied at first based on grainy police video)
The media spliced his audio to imply things he never said.

So far you've been wrong on EVERRRRRRRRYTHING.

He never "Chased after martin" - the police officer asked him where he went. Zimmerman went to get an address, so that the police could meet him. If you look at the actual video you'll see the "confrontation" happened 10 feet from his car. Just like he said all along.

And now the desperate delusional racists (against hispanics) claim that he's a sociopath and that he "Tricked" a voice analytics lie detector. LOL how fucking desperate are you guys. How deep does your racism against hispanic people run? EVERYTHING he has said has lined up with the evidence. Give it the fuck up. You tried to find a fall guy because you hate guns, and you are racist against hispanics, you jumped the issue and now you don't have the gumption to just admit you are wrong. very sad.
 
There is much more evidence pointing to zimmermans innocence than guilt. Everything has lined up so far with his story.

But what is really flying over your head, and what you are failing to understand, is that I am reflecting back exactly at you and your kind the same stuff that you put out, except I am doing it from a higher ground, with actual evidence, (not conjecture or inference or feelings) with a system that ASSUMES innocence, where tie goes to the defendant.

Witnesses support his testimony
Him passing a lie detector test backs up everything he has already said.
He received multiple head injuries (which everyone denied at first based on grainy police video)
The media spliced his audio to imply things he never said.

So far you've been wrong on EVERRRRRRRRYTHING.

He never "Chased after martin" - the police officer asked him where he went. Zimmerman went to get an address, so that the police could meet him. If you look at the actual video you'll see the "confrontation" happened 10 feet from his car. Just like he said all along.

And now the desperate delusional racists (against hispanics) claim that he's a sociopath and that he "Tricked" a voice analytics lie detector. LOL how fucking desperate are you guys. How deep does your racism against hispanic people run? EVERYTHING he has said has lined up with the evidence. Give it the fuck up. You tried to find a fall guy because you hate guns, and you are racist against hispanics, you jumped the issue and now you don't have the gumption to just admit you are wrong. very sad.

Everything you supporters have for this case is one-sided. Supporters dismissed evidence by Martin's girlfriend and the neighbors who heard noise. Supporters started a smear campaign against Martin by dragging in his school records and family situation while ignoring GZ's rap sheet and jailhouse lying. Supporters bring up GZ's superficial injuries while ignoring evidence of Martin's injuries, in addition to the fatal gunshot wound. There is NO video of the actual confrontation, just GZ acting out his version of the events. The only living person left is GZ and he has a vested interest in covering his @ss, not to mention he's secure in the fact that Martin can't give his side of the story. GZ didn't even have the connected brain cells to tell Martin he was part of a neighborhood watch, his m.o. was shoot first, ask questions later.

You have hella nerve to say I'm a "racist against Hispanics". How about this, you're racist against blacks and will believe anything GZ says because of your bias. I hope you realize how nonsensical that is. My concern is for a dead teenager who can't defend himself against a man who's had his own brushes with the law and was proven to be a liar.
 
You have hella nerve to say I'm a "racist against Hispanics". How about this, you're racist against blacks and will believe anything GZ says because of your bias. I hope you realize how nonsensical that is.

I didn't read the rest of your response because I already know you are wrong, you've been proven wrong on everything regarding this story so far. But I do appreciate this quote, and I agree with you. As I said, some of my post was going over your head. It's purposeful trolling to reflect back some of the idiotic sentiments I have heard from others. I am glad I have you on record with this comment though. (not being facetious)

(i hate how I have to add the *not being facetious* disclaimer to my posts these days -_-)
 
I didn't read the rest of your response because I already know you are wrong, you've been proven wrong on everything regarding this story so far. But I do appreciate this quote, and I agree with you. As I said, some of my post was going over your head. It's purposeful trolling to reflect back some of the idiotic sentiments I have heard from others. I am glad I have you on record with this comment though. (not being facetious)

(i hate how I have to add the *not being facetious* disclaimer to my posts these days -_-)

Sorry, neither you nor I have been "proven" anything. Only time will tell which of us has the right to gloat.
 
I didn't read the rest of your response because I already know you are wrong, you've been proven wrong on everything regarding this story so far. But I do appreciate this quote, and I agree with you. As I said, some of my post was going over your head. It's purposeful trolling to reflect back some of the idiotic sentiments I have heard from others. I am glad I have you on record with this comment though. (not being facetious)

(i hate how I have to add the *not being facetious* disclaimer to my posts these days -_-)

You have seen all the evidence of the case? Or are you going by only the evidence that the press has released?

Is that why you are able to say there is more evidence for his innocence than guilt?
 
Back
Top