No evidence White House involved in ‘Fast and Furious’

[Cancel 2016.2]

I'm rather curious how we can arrive at the conclusion that the White House was not involved when there are thousands of documents that have not been disclosed.

Because Obama said so.... and that is all you need to know.

 

[Bonestorm]

LOL giving a gun to a murderer would make one an accomplice. You are really an ignorant person for such a big-mouth know-it-all

No, it wouldn't. It could make one an accessory, but giving a gun to a murderer would not alone be enough even for accessory status.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Tell us Christie... if the White House was not involved and did not know... then how could they evoke executive privilege?

Either the use of executive privilege was bogus or the admin knew about it ahead of time. It cannot be both.

There would be no evidence of a murder either, if the murderer could invoke EP and block the investigation.

 

[NOVA]

So Iran-Contra was an act of war?

So the Contras were 'criminals'.....is that your position ?

How about skipping the middle man and you commenting about a country directly going into a country and killing its citizens.....ie,... Obama killing Libyans...
or would rather just groan and run like you usually do...

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Where were these Republicas who are outraged when the Bush administration claimed Executive Privldege 6 times?

Probably sitting at the same bar that the Democrats were at, when Clinton used it 14 times.

 

[Jarod]

Tell you what retard... show me where I 'attacked the right to carry assault rifles'...

You were blaming this on assault rifles.

 

[zappasguitar]

Facts:
Assault rifles found on site used by those that killed agent
Assault rifles were from F&F
Assault rifle bullet is what killed agent
Assault rifle bullet that killed agent is too badly damaged to determine for sure which weapon it was fired from

Democrats response:
There is no proof he was killed by a F&F weapon.

By your response Rana, there is no way a conviction could ever occur because you can never match the bullet to any gun.

And what percentage of guns recovered at the scene came from the F & F program as opposed to the total number of assault weapons recovered at the scene?

You want to prove your claims then start providing corroboration to prove it's within reason for you to ASSUME the bullet came from an F & F gun.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

You were blaming this on assault rifles.

No Jarod... I was not.

 

[Jarod]

No Jarod... I was not.

liar

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

liar

Listen moron... if you think otherwise, please tell us which post number you are referring to.

 

[Jarod]

#111

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

#111

Then you are indeed a fucking retard. That post does not attack the Second Amendment or assault rifles. it states the type of weapon used in the murder of Agent Terry.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

I did not take a position then, I dont take one now.... hmmmmm.....

Then why did you find it necessary to bring up Bush's use of it, in an effort to defend Obama?

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

And what percentage of guns recovered at the scene came from the F & F program as opposed to the total number of assault weapons recovered at the scene?

100%... both weapons were from F&F

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-31727_162-20100687-10391695.html

You want to prove your claims then start providing corroboration to prove it's within reason for you to ASSUME the bullet came from an F & F gun.[/QUOTE]

You do the math. But remember, they cannot prove which one it came from.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

F&F started as a Bush Operation.

No it didn't.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

They're just brown people, what do Democrats care about dead brown people?

As long as they vote (D).

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Yes, when you hand a known murderer a weapon and that criminal murders a US citizen (and ATF agent), you are complicit in murder.

Actually, you aren't. You are responsible for giving a gun to someone that you should not have given a gun to, but you are not complicit in murder.

Using that defense, in Court, will definetly result in making your dream of showering with large tattooed men a reality.

 

[Bonestorm]

100%... both weapons were from F&F

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-31727_162-20100687-10391695.html

You want to prove your claims then start providing corroboration to prove it's within reason for you to ASSUME the bullet came from an F & F gun.

You do the math. But remember, they cannot prove which one it came from.

It's not a question of math. You assume that the two guns recovered were the only guns involved. That's not necessarily the case. You also assume that the F&F program was the only source of assault rifles for the assailants. I don't that that assumption is necessarily warranted either. In fact, I'm quite certain that the Mexican cartels had access to assault weapons before F&F and have access to assault weapons after F&F.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

What hasn't been established Darla? It is a fact that the guns were allowed to 'walk' to Mexican gangs. It is a fact that one of the guns was used to kill Brian Terry.

It is a fact Holder knew about it. There is a lot we don't know, but we know the preceding for certain. Or are you just getting your news from lala land?

It's just another example of: "Must defend Obama, a Black man, no matter what".

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

It's not a question of math. You assume that the two guns recovered were the only guns involved. That's not necessarily the case. You also assume that the F&F program was the only source of assault rifles for the assailants. I don't that that assumption is necessarily warranted either. In fact, I'm quite certain that the Mexican cartels had access to assault weapons before F&F and have access to assault weapons after F&F.

LMAO... yeah it was the second gunman on the grassy knoll that did it.

In liberal world, there would never be a conviction on anything because we can almost always use the 'sumthin else might have happened'.

I know other weapons 'could' have been involved. I know that a third weapon (also F&F... has supposedly disappeared.... another conspiracy) was allegedly at the scene. there could have been 1000 Mexican drug lords present... etc...

Based on the evidence at hand... reach the conclusions that you will.