Multimillionaire Mittzie's top VP pick: who?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guns Guns Guns
  • Start date Start date
In an interview with FOX News's Bret Baier, the Florida senator fielded a series of questions about three of the top known issues that could snag him in VP vetting: how he used his Republican Party of Florida credit card, his friendship with embattled Rep. David Rivera, and a foreclosure threat on a house he and Rivera owned.


The transcript is below:


BRET BAIER: When you were speaker of the Florida House, you charged personal expenses on this party-issued credit card. What happened with that?


MARCO RUBIO: At the end of every month, we would get those statements. We would see what was on there that was party-related, and the party would pay that. If it wasn't party-related, I would pay that directly to American Express.


Now, obviously, in hindsight, it looks bad, right? I mean, why are you using a party credit card at all? Well, some of these expenses were because a travel agent had the number, you know, the credit card number, and they billed it to that card instead of the other card. Sometimes, it was just a mistake, you know, literally just reached for the wrong card.


But it's important people understand I did not bill personal expenses to the Republican Party of Florida. The Republican Party of Florida never paid my personal expenses. Never. But look, you know, I shouldn't have done it that way. It was — it was — lesson learned.


BAIER: Another thing that people raise concerns about — what is your relationship with Rep. Rivera?


RUBIO: He's a friend. I mean, he's a friend I've known on a personal level even before I was elected or he was elected to office. So look, I know he's going through a tough time. And we've all read the press reports and none of us like to see that about anybody, much less a friend. And he's going to have to deal with those issues.

BAIER: Rubio is hosting a fundraiser for Rivera in May. Adding to the media questions, Rivera and Rubio bought a house together in Tallahassee during their time in the state House, a house the bank was moving to foreclose.


RUBIO: There was a disagreement with the bank about how much the monthly payments were. And it all got confusing. The bank turned it over to a — one of these law firms in Florida that specialized in quick foreclosure proceedings. And before we could figure it all out with them, they filed this paperwork. So we quickly addressed it, and we've never had a problem since.


BAIER: You were not making payments.


RUBIO: Yes, there was a disagreement over the amount per month. And so to them, that's not — those are not complete payments. And — and — so there were all kinds of other things that happened as a result of that. But that all got worked out as soon as we found out about it. Certainly, as soon as I found out about it, we addressed it and we moved on with it. Now, I've been handling that personally.



http://www.politico.com/blogs/burns...it-card-rivera-mortgage-questions-122137.html

 
In an interview with FOX News's Bret Baier, the Florida senator fielded a series of questions about three of the top known issues that could snag him in VP vetting: how he used his Republican Party of Florida credit card, his friendship with embattled Rep. David Rivera, and a foreclosure threat on a house he and Rivera owned.


The transcript is below:


BRET BAIER: When you were speaker of the Florida House, you charged personal expenses on this party-issued credit card. What happened with that?


MARCO RUBIO: At the end of every month, we would get those statements. We would see what was on there that was party-related, and the party would pay that. If it wasn't party-related, I would pay that directly to American Express.


Now, obviously, in hindsight, it looks bad, right? I mean, why are you using a party credit card at all? Well, some of these expenses were because a travel agent had the number, you know, the credit card number, and they billed it to that card instead of the other card. Sometimes, it was just a mistake, you know, literally just reached for the wrong card.


But it's important people understand I did not bill personal expenses to the Republican Party of Florida. The Republican Party of Florida never paid my personal expenses. Never. But look, you know, I shouldn't have done it that way. It was — it was — lesson learned.


BAIER: Another thing that people raise concerns about — what is your relationship with Rep. Rivera?


RUBIO: He's a friend. I mean, he's a friend I've known on a personal level even before I was elected or he was elected to office. So look, I know he's going through a tough time. And we've all read the press reports and none of us like to see that about anybody, much less a friend. And he's going to have to deal with those issues.

BAIER: Rubio is hosting a fundraiser for Rivera in May. Adding to the media questions, Rivera and Rubio bought a house together in Tallahassee during their time in the state House, a house the bank was moving to foreclose.


RUBIO: There was a disagreement with the bank about how much the monthly payments were. And it all got confusing. The bank turned it over to a — one of these law firms in Florida that specialized in quick foreclosure proceedings. And before we could figure it all out with them, they filed this paperwork. So we quickly addressed it, and we've never had a problem since.


BAIER: You were not making payments.


RUBIO: Yes, there was a disagreement over the amount per month. And so to them, that's not — those are not complete payments. And — and — so there were all kinds of other things that happened as a result of that. But that all got worked out as soon as we found out about it. Certainly, as soon as I found out about it, we addressed it and we moved on with it. Now, I've been handling that personally.



http://www.politico.com/blogs/burns...it-card-rivera-mortgage-questions-122137.html


What's more, National Journal added that the controversy hasn't been fully resolved, despite the senator's claims to the contrary, and Rubio has not yet released relevant materials documenting the extent of his role in the controversy.
 
What's more, National Journal added that the controversy hasn't been fully resolved, despite the senator's claims to the contrary, and Rubio has not yet released relevant materials documenting the extent of his role in the controversy.

Which 'controversy' is that Rana?
 
Thanks for the assist my fellow seekers of truth!

Supercandy, you have been owned once again!

Im not sure why the Republicans are so sensative about Rubio, they freak out if you say anything negative about him. He is the Cuban Sarah Palin.
 
There is no current link because the investigation started in 2010 and apparently is ongoing.

LMAO... there is an open 'ethics violation charge' in the FL House... it is open because a Democrat opened it not based on any evidence, but rather because he saw Rubio's name mentioned in a paper with regards to an IRS investigation. I wonder why a Democrat would leave the 'ethics investigation' open for over 2 years? Hmmm... nah, couldn't be political.
 
Thanks for the assist my fellow seekers of truth!

Supercandy, you have been owned once again!

Im not sure why the Republicans are so sensative about Rubio, they freak out if you say anything negative about him. He is the Cuban Sarah Palin.

Once again you run away from answering for your claims. Your fellow 'seekers of truth' have done nothing to further your cause.

To date your three claims are still invalid.

1) He did not commit credit card fraud
2) He did not lie about his family
3) No lobbyist paid for his mortgage.... a claim you cannot even provide one link for that even mentions that claim let alone provides evidence of such
 
LMAO... there is an open 'ethics violation charge' in the FL House... it is open because a Democrat opened it not based on any evidence, but rather because he saw Rubio's name mentioned in a paper with regards to an IRS investigation. I wonder why a Democrat would leave the 'ethics investigation' open for over 2 years? Hmmm... nah, couldn't be political.

Do you have a cite for your claim that its political or are you lying again?
 
Once again you run away from answering for your claims. Your fellow 'seekers of truth' have done nothing to further your cause.

To date your three claims are still invalid.

1) He did not commit credit card fraud
2) He did not lie about his family
3) No lobbyist paid for his mortgage.... a claim you cannot even provide one link for that even mentions that claim let alone provides evidence of such

Cite?

BTW, I never said a lobbyist paid for his mortgage!
 
Yes and Rick Perry will be the Republican Presidential Candidate in 2012

Just because I was wrong about one thing does not make me wrong about another. At least I can admit when I have been wrong, unlike some people!
 
Do you have a cite for your claim that its political or are you lying again?

I am stating MY opinion Jarod. If you feel there is a valid reason it has remained open for over 2 years, by all means... share it with us.

Are you still running away from sourcing your bullshit claim Jarod?
 
I am stating MY opinion Jarod. If you feel there is a valid reason it has remained open for over 2 years, by all means... share it with us.

Are you still running away from sourcing your bullshit claim Jarod?

According to your logic, that constitutes a lie!
 
Just because I was wrong about one thing does not make me wrong about another. At least I can admit when I have been wrong, unlike some people!

Jarod, I have shown you are wrong on two of your 'scandals'. Hell, you are too scared to post where you got the third bullshit claim from. Probably because you know I will debunk that one too.
 
According to your logic, that constitutes a lie!

No moron... only if you show that my opinion is wrong by demonstrating facts to the contrary and then I persist in restating my original opinion would it be a lie.

You just aren't intelligent enough to keep up are you?
 
Cite?

BTW, I never said a lobbyist paid for his mortgage!

He lied regarding his family's immigration the USA.
A lobbiest was alleged to have paid his mortgage.
He used a Republican Party credit card fraudulently for personal services such as back waxing to tge tune of thousands of dollars!

You stated a lobbyist was alleged to have paid his mortgage... you have provided no evidence of anyone alleging any such thing. Why not Jarod? Lying?
 
No moron... only if you show that my opinion is wrong by demonstrating facts to the contrary and then I persist in restating my original opinion would it be a lie.

You just aren't intelligent enough to keep up are you?

Thats not what occures prior to you calling me a liar over and over again silly!

I say something, then you respond by asking for a cite, then you form an opinion that I was wrong and start calling me a liar. Its okay, it simply makes you look kinda silly when you use strong words that dont fit.
 
Thats not what occures prior to you calling me a liar over and over again silly!

I say something, then you respond by asking for a cite, then you form an opinion that I was wrong and start calling me a liar. Its okay, it simply makes you look kinda silly when you use strong words that dont fit.

No Jarod, that is not what transpired. You made a claim, I asked for a cite, you provided a cite for two of your three claims, the cite you provided debunked both of your claims. I pointed that out, then you continued reaffirming your original claims... THEN I called you a liar. Which is exactly what you are.

Still waiting on that link for the third claim Jarod.
 
You stated a lobbyist was alleged to have paid his mortgage... you have provided no evidence of anyone alleging any such thing. Why not Jarod? Lying?

You don't know what the word "alleged" means, do you?

I've got a question about Rubio's spending spree at the expense of the RPOF.

How in the world can something bought online be considered a mistake?

Date: 2008-04-03

Ammount: $765.05

City: Johnson City TN

Expense: Apple Web Store

I'm sure there's a lot more like this...
 
No Jarod, that is not what transpired. You made a claim, I asked for a cite, you provided a cite for two of your three claims, the cite you provided debunked both of your claims. I pointed that out, then you continued reaffirming your original claims... THEN I called you a liar. Which is exactly what you are.

Still waiting on that link for the third claim Jarod.

You say the cites debunked my claims, thats just simply not true. You were illistrated to be simply wrong.

I did not claim Rubio was guilty of a fraud crime.
I did not claim anything had been proven.

I said he has scandals that made it unlikely Rubio would be chosen to be VP.
 
Back
Top