Obama's Law Professor: The President Must Be Defeated.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/16/roberto-unger-obama_n_1602812.html

One of President Barack Obama's former professors appears to have turned against him, according to a recent YouTube video.

"President Obama must be defeated in the coming election," Roberto Unger, a longtime professor at Harvard Law School who taught Obama, said in a video posted on May 22. "He has failed to advance the progressive cause in the United States."

Unger said that Obama must lose the election in order for "the voice of democratic prophecy to speak once again in American life."

He acknowledged that if a Republican wins the presidency, "there will be a cost ... in judicial and administrative appointments." But he said that "the risk of military adventurism" would be no worse under a Republican than under Obama, and that "the Democratic Party proposes no new direction."

More at link...

As Althea alludes to in msg #8 when Obama has no future election to worry about he'll get down to the business of change. Programs like ObamaCare take time to fully implement and tweak. He made a temporary decision regarding illegal aliens. It's difficult for him to further progressive ideas with the Repubs constantly obstructing.

My take on it is Obama is hoping/waiting for a majority rather than end up with a compromise that won't work. If he compromises now on plans/policies and wins a majority he'll be stuck with the compromises. As he's told us he is a patient man. If he doesn't win a majority he can always fall back to a compromise position.
 
Some of these points have the scent of facts. But only a scent.

And the bold segement is true. My biggest complaint with Obama, is his number one agenda....to get re-elected.

As such, he's carefully crafted a history of reaching out to the republicans, only to have his hand slapped away.

He can now demonstrate that he's tried the 'compromise' method, and it doesn't work.


Perhaps when he has no future election to worry about, he'll get down to the business of change?

Bingo! Unger (who, by the way, preaches a nearly pure marxist philosophy, is pissed at Obama because he's become not progressive enough. Of course, those on the right don't see that...they see someone criticizing Obama and get a hard-on for the guy.

To a point, I see what he's saying...and so do you. Obama tried soooo hard to "be one" with the Republicans, those on the left thought he had forsaken them. People like me, though, applauded his attempts at compromise at first, then realized Obama could, in one fell swoop, end world hunger, poverty and hate; and the right would find fault with it.

Hopefully, and I say hopefully because there's a hell of a lot of racist crazies out there today, if Obama's reelected he shifts back to the left and the right is forced to compromise.
 
Bingo! Unger (who, by the way, preaches a nearly pure marxist philosophy, is pissed at Obama because he's become not progressive enough. Of course, those on the right don't see that...they see someone criticizing Obama and get a hard-on for the guy.

To a point, I see what he's saying...and so do you. Obama tried soooo hard to "be one" with the Republicans, those on the left thought he had forsaken them. People like me, though, applauded his attempts at compromise at first, then realized Obama could, in one fell swoop, end world hunger, poverty and hate; and the right would find fault with it.

Hopefully, and I say hopefully because there's a hell of a lot of racist crazies out there today, if Obama's reelected he shifts back to the left and the right is forced to compromise.


Is Damo now the 'rightwinger' that don't understand what he posted ? Really ? Has a hard on for this Harvard professor...????

The very fact that he posted this, makes the point that you're a moron that is quite clueless except to parrot the far left partisan bullshit you hear...
 
I wonder why Damocles didn't seem to give equal credence to multimillionaire Mittzie's former professor?



mitt_skousen.gif



In an interview with an Iowa radio station five years ago, the former Massachusetts governoracknowledged the influence ofa controversial figure from his own schoolboy past—W. Cleon Skousen, the late Mormon historian and tea party hero who taught Romney at Brigham Young University.

Romney's embrace of Skousen came in an August 2007 with Iowa talk radio host Jan Mickelson, a conservative talker Politico's Jonathan Martin calls "the Rush Limbaugh of Des Moines."

A former FBI agent, Salt Lake City police chief, and professional conspiracy theorist, Skousen fashioned a narrative of American history that held a unique appeal to religious conservatives—all based on the notion that the Founding Fathers were members of a lost tribe of Israel.

His work also sparked a fierce backlash over racist passages and baseless, bordering on conspiratorial, assertions that prompted the Mormon church to take steps to quash his influence.

"Cleon Skousen has a book called The Thousand Years" Romney said. The Thousand Years is actually a trilogy that details the 4,000 years that elapsed between the creation of the earth and the birth of Christ.

The book, Romney said, could set Mickelson straight on what he actually believes.

After his heyday in the 1980s, Skousen faded into irrelevance, only to be resurrected at the dawn of the tea party era.

Glenn Beck, who called Skousen's
Five Thousand Year Leap "years ahead of its time," made its ideas the centerpiece of his 9/12 movement and wrote the foreword to a new edition of the book.

Texas Gov. Rick Perry said that Skousen "shares his views" on the founding of the country and touted him in speeches to evangelical audiences.

Constitutional seminars based on Skousen's theories of an Anglo-Saxon chosen people popped up across the country.


Conservatives have attempted to turn Obama's undergraduate and law school record into a wedge issue.

FOX News touted Obama's public embrace of a respected civil rights attorney and law school professor as evidence of unspoken extremist views; Romney surrogate Donald Trump publicly questioned whether Obama was a beneficiary of affirmative action; Romney, owner of two Harvard degrees, hammers the president for holding one.

Even the candidate's son, Tagg, got in on the action, joking last fall that his dad would release his tax returns when Obama released his transcript from Columbia University (and his birth certificate).

Democrats have thus far been reluctant to return the favor with Romney—but Skousen is a reminder that two can play that game.




http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/04/mitt-romney-cleon-skousen-nutty-professor


Skousen! That nut is bravo's hero. He wrote The Naked Communist and claims the US already met the goals back in 1958.
 
Is Damo now the 'rightwinger' that don't understand what he posted ? Really ? Has a hard on for this Harvard professor...????

The very fact that he posted this, makes the point that you're a moron that is quite clueless except to parrot the far left partisan bullshit you hear...

I thought I told you to shut the fuck up Blabo.
 
Yeah, fuck Pakistan. All they ever do is stab us in the back. The only reason they get away with so much shit is that they have nukes and are largely seen as unstable.
And we need to pass through their land to reach Afghanistan. Remember? We're certainly not flying over Iran.
 
And we need to pass through their land to reach Afghanistan. Remember? We're certainly not flying over Iran.

another reason that we should have stayed out of afghanistan

pakistan is not a ideological homogeneous nation that has pockets of hatred for any sort of change that threatens the local tribal chief's power and the male dominance culture
 
As Althea alludes to in msg #8 when Obama has no future election to worry about he'll get down to the business of change. Programs like ObamaCare take time to fully implement and tweak. He made a temporary decision regarding illegal aliens. It's difficult for him to further progressive ideas with the Repubs constantly obstructing.

My take on it is Obama is hoping/waiting for a majority rather than end up with a compromise that won't work. If he compromises now on plans/policies and wins a majority he'll be stuck with the compromises. As he's told us he is a patient man. If he doesn't win a majority he can always fall back to a compromise position.

Odd how I don't remember that being part of his campaign speech's, back in 2008??!! :palm:
 
We must keep the stooge in power while we build revolutionary momentum, after which we will usher in a total reconstruction of American society.
 
Odd how I don't remember that being part of his campaign speech's, back in 2008??!! :palm:

Obviously Obama didn't realize just how old, tired and worn out the Repubs' ideas were/are. He hoped once things were explained in a logical manner they would come on board but ......

We come back to ObamaCare. Almost every advanced nation has implemented government medical. There is nothing radical about it. It's no more radical than education for our youth or assistance for the needy, yet, the Repubs went ballistic.

Keeping the youth that were educated here rather than deporting them is just logical. No country would ever consider doing such a silly thing. Countries do all they can to keep their educated youth. This is what I mean by being logical. Whatever the circumstances pertaining to immigration kicking the educated youth out of the country is not the answer. It's absurd and Obama has been watching it happen as Congress stalls and obstructs on getting an immigration policy in place. A brain drain was happening and Obama had to stop it.

As for this not being part of his campaign speech back in 2008 I doubt he could have imagined such idiocy from the Right of not only watching a brain drain happen but insisting on it. At the end of the day he must just shake his head in disbelief. :(
 
what about the gop dedication to war with iran
Obama has said "no accommodation" with a nuclear Iran.
We've tried sanctions, and that malware slowed them down,,but eventualy they'll get nukes.
Think Obama means what he says here? See his history of indifferent drone use, i believe he means it.
Once again Obama, and the Repubs are one and the same on wars.
 
So some law professor says that the president is not liberal enough, who cares?
 
Back
Top