The ‘American Dream’ Is a Myth
- Thread starter signalmankenneth
- Start date
G
Guns Guns Guns
Guest
The 1% is living the dream.
it's only a myth for proles, and the mouth breathing masses. no one ever said stupidity would help you succeed.
G
Guns Guns Guns
Guest
Look what's it's done for you.
when people earn money, it isn't yours. it's theirs. this concept will always alude the proles. there isn't a money machine that the rich used to take more than their fair share. their fair share is exactly what they have, because it's what they earned, and it's now their own property. if you are poor, too bad. move to northern europe. If I was actually as miserable as the proles pretended to be, I would be gone asap. Why complain about not having healthcare or income equality when there are plenty of countries out there that would afford you that? your ancestors left their homelands, perhaps it's time the losers of this nation leave as well. Maybe some of you simply aren't cut out to make it here, but it thats the case, please don't drag the rest of us down with you.
G
Guns Guns Guns
Guest
LOL.
signalmankenneth
Verified User
G
Guns Guns Guns
Guest
Remind me, Ken...how did Mass fare during Romney's single term?
What is all this mouth breather crap?
Deviated septums is a medical congenitial condition.
Why should one be made fun of becuase of this, kind of like making fun of someone becuase they were born deformed in some more visible way.
Should tax dollars be spent on correcting this condition?
Deviated septums is a medical congenitial condition.
Why should one be made fun of becuase of this, kind of like making fun of someone becuase they were born deformed in some more visible way.
Should tax dollars be spent on correcting this condition?
apple0154
MEOW
I suppose it all depends on ones definition of "earn". For example, Monsanto's genetically modified seeds/plants. If their plants go to seed and the wind blows the seed onto the neighbor's field the neighbor does not own the plants that grow. He has to give Monsanto a cut if he sells the plants. Is that "earning" money or stealing/confiscating the neighbor's field/crops?
Yepper soon ther will be NO non genetically modified soy beans seeds available and Monsanto will control all soy bean seeds.
G
Guns Guns Guns
Guest
If the government was doing this, the righties would be screaming, wouldn't they?
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
seriously....go be poor or middle class in any other country and tell me the standard of living is better
the class warfare stuff is overblown by certain dems. i have no problem with getting taxes back to 1990 levels for those making over 500K....but stop bashing the wealthy and corporations. go live in a stalinesque society if you don't like it.
the class warfare stuff is overblown by certain dems. i have no problem with getting taxes back to 1990 levels for those making over 500K....but stop bashing the wealthy and corporations. go live in a stalinesque society if you don't like it.
apple0154
MEOW
The hidden catastrophe is a bacteria or virus could wipe out the entire species as the modifications might have interfered with the plant's natural defence mechanism.
signalmankenneth
Verified User
So a governor who presided over nearly the worst job creation in the nation (here’s an InfoGraphic of The Real Job Creators), raised taxes on the middle class, and left a billion dollar deficit for his successor, now tells the country that his business experience is the backbone of his candidacy. But that experience didn’t do much good for the people of Massachusetts.
The truth is, based on Romney’s experience, the failure of his administration in Massachusetts was entirely predictable. He has pretty good credentials as a corporate raider and an investment manager if you are looking to hire someone who is skilled at extracting profits from companies headed toward bankruptcy. But if you are looking for a leader with expertise in growing the economy with a long-term perspective on creating wealth for a broad range of citizens (not just the 1%), then Romney’s background is not only irrelevant, it is a contra-indicator for success.
Voting for Mitt Romney for president would be like hiring an arsonist to put out a fire.
you do realize we can't have a ton of job creation when EVERYONE IN MASS IS BASICALLY ALREADY EMPLOYED right?
We aren't a prole state.
We aren't a prole state.
G
Guns Guns Guns
Guest
So a governor who presided over nearly the worst job creation in the nation (here’s an InfoGraphic of The Real Job Creators), raised taxes on the middle class, and left a billion dollar deficit for his successor, now tells the country that his business experience is the backbone of his candidacy. But that experience didn’t do much good for the people of Massachusetts.
The truth is, based on Romney’s experience, the failure of his administration in Massachusetts was entirely predictable. He has pretty good credentials as a corporate raider and an investment manager if you are looking to hire someone who is skilled at extracting profits from companies headed toward bankruptcy. But if you are looking for a leader with expertise in growing the economy with a long-term perspective on creating wealth for a broad range of citizens (not just the 1%), then Romney’s background is not only irrelevant, it is a contra-indicator for success.
Voting for Mitt Romney for president would be like hiring an arsonist to put out a fire.
So his claims to be a job creator are false?