The 'elite' require more protection than you proles

[SmarterthanYou]

Sandefur v. Hanover Park, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79412 (N.D. Ill. June 7, 2012)

Here, the court finds it significant that the stop took place in the context of a Village Board meeting. The situation is thus somewhat different from a typical Terry stop of an individual on the street. In the public setting of a Village Board meeting, the potential consequences of failing to apprehend an individual about to commit a crime are significantly enhanced, for any criminal activity is a threat not only to the order of the meeting, but also to the safety of all present. A stop that would not be justified on the street might therefore be reasonable in the setting and circumstances of a public meeting.

With that backdrop, the court determines that there was reasonable suspicion to seize Sandefur at the meeting, take him to the hallway, and search him. As explained above, the defendants had observed that Sandefur was carrying a concealed weapon, and they were not aware that he was a law enforcement officer. Moreover, Sandefur was very animated as he addressed the Board. The defendants were thus justified in attempting to ascertain whether Sandefur was legitimately carrying the weapon. Moreover, the search was minimally intrusive, for it lasted no longer than necessary to ascertain that Sandefur was a law enforcement officer and involved only as much force as necessary to secure Sandefur and prevent any potential harm to the attendees of the meeting. Within only a few minutes of the commencement of the search, Sandefur was free to leave.

In a combined First and Fourth Amendment case, plaintiff was at a city council meeting to speak, and he was animated and concerned others when they determine he was armed. He was removed from the meeting, and it was determined that he was a law enforcement officer, so they let him back in.

Fourth Amendment.com

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

Sandefur v. Hanover Park, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79412 (N.D. Ill. June 7, 2012) In a combined First and Fourth Amendment case, plaintiff was at a city council meeting to speak, and he was animated and concerned others when they determine he was armed. He was removed from the meeting, and it was determined that he was a law enforcement officer, so they let him back in. Fourth Amendment.com

LOL, so just wait for 'em all to die out.

All we preppers have to do is sit back, stock up, stay clear for awhile, and the proles nature will take it's course.

 

[Don Quixote]

Sandefur v. Hanover Park, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79412 (N.D. Ill. June 7, 2012)



In a combined First and Fourth Amendment case, plaintiff was at a city council meeting to speak, and he was animated and concerned others when they determine he was armed. He was removed from the meeting, and it was determined that he was a law enforcement officer, so they let him back in.

Fourth Amendment.com

why are you so down on proles, without proles there would not be anything to eat, wear or use

[h=2]prole[/h]   [prohl, proh-lee] http://dictionary.reference.com/help/luna/Spell_pron_key.html Show IPA
noun Informal .1.a member of the proletariat.

2.a person who performs routine tasks in a society.


adjective3.proletarian ( def. 1 ) .


​

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

why are you so down on proles, without proles there would not be anything to eat, wear or use...

Earlier, SmarterThanFew said this:

do you have a cell phone? how about an automobile? a bicycle? do you buy pre packaged food from a grocery store? do you buy clothes or make them yourself? anything you buy from a store is a product or service, is a product or service bought from a corporate raider.

 

[Don Quixote]

Earlier, SmarterThanFew said this:

corporate raiders are legal vultures on society

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

corporate raiders are legal vultures on society

But SmarterThanFew said otherwise, didn't he?