CRIMINAL: BP's Cover-Up of Blow-Out in Caspian Sea

Aoxomoxoa said:
It is destined to go the way of DC power transmission, Edison has taught a whole generation of charlatans the power of marketing!
Click to expand...
Remarkably poor example Tom.
While Edison may have been wrong about DC, his idea of small well distributed power stations was exactly the direction a "smart grid" will take us.
Furthermore, when will wind power stop growing at a rate of 25% per anum and begin to "go the way of DC power transmission"?
 
Aoxomoxoa said:
So what exactly are your scientific credentials? Wind power is a total blind alley and monumental waste of time, anybody with an ounce of knowledge knows that for a fact. You seem to be one of those that distrusts anyone with scientific knowledge as some kind of dangerous subversive who must be silenced lest the plebs get to hear the truth! See I can indulge in rhetoric as well.
Click to expand...
What exactly are yours, other than a long tenure as an employee of BP? Darla is right, you are a puffed up blowhard.
 
Rune said:
What exactly are yours, other than a long tenure as an employee of BP? Darla is right, you are a puffed up blowhard.
Click to expand...

He has done everything he can to deflect from the topic (BP's criminal negligence) by talking about the 'issue' of energy. He has avoided direct questions regarding his obvious bias and minimization of BP's criminal negligence, and used projection ('naive', 'emotion-laden', etc.) to dismiss valid assertions about his defense of the oil industry. Further, he's either woefully ignorant of the actual topic, or is deliberately obfuscating when he attempts (and fails) to purport that BP 'faced up' to its culpability regarding Deepwater.
 
Aoxomoxoa said:
So what exactly were the levels of caesium 134 and caesium 137 found in those tuna? The Japanese legal limit was 500 becquerels per kilogram which they have recently revised down to 100. So on the old measure the levels found are 100 times below their legal limit and on the new 20 times!! That doesn't look so good in a headline so sensationalist media types choose to omit that info.

Anyway maybe it is a good thing as blue fin tuna are being fished to extinction and it might stop that happening for a while.



http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/201...-radiation-fukushima-california?newsfeed=true
Click to expand...
Nice one Tom.
Put some freaking effort into your lies or stand the fuck off.
20 times the acceptable level is safe to you? With this statement alone you entirely discredit yourself.

As to the BULLSHIT about tuna being overfished, prove it. Now. Do it. Tuna is the single most regulated fish species in the world.

The real reason tuna faces iminent decline is two fold;
1. The atlantic bluefin tuna's sole breeding ground is the Gulf of Mexico, contaminated now by your precious BP's treacherous and unprecedented overuse of dispersants in their criminal attempt to mask the extent of their oil spill.

2. The pacific bluefin tuna population's sole breeding ground is the Sea of Japan, now and likely forever contaminated by "safe" (according to you) nuclear power.

You have made your self into a laughing stock in this thread, as you have done in other similar threads.
Even the suckers don't believe your bullshit anymore.
 
Bijou said:
He has done everything he can to deflect from the topic (BP's criminal negligence) by talking about the 'issue' of energy. He has avoided direct questions regarding his obvious bias and minimization of BP's criminal negligence, and used projection ('naive', 'emotion-laden', etc.) to dismiss valid assertions about his defense of the oil industry. Further, he's either woefully ignorant of the actual topic, or is deliberately obfuscating when he attempts (and fails) to purport that BP 'faced up' to its culpability regarding Deepwater.
Click to expand...

Exactly. Thankyou.
 
Rune said:
Nice one Tom.
Put some freaking effort into your lies or stand the fuck off.
20 times the acceptable level is safe to you? With this statement alone you entirely discredit yourself.

As to the BULLSHIT about tuna being overfished, prove it. Now. Do it. Tuna is the single most regulated fish species in the world.

The real reason tuna faces iminent decline is two fold;
1. The atlantic bluefin tuna's sole breeding ground is the Gulf of Mexico, contaminated now by your precious BP's treacherous and unprecedented overuse of dispersants in their criminal attempt to mask the extent of their oil spill.

2. The pacific bluefin tuna population's sole breeding ground is the Sea of Japan, now and likely forever contaminated by "safe" (according to you) nuclear power.

You have made your self into a laughing stock in this thread, as you have done in other similar threads.
Even the suckers don't believe your bullshit anymore.
Click to expand...

while the levels of cesium in the pacific blue-fin tuna found on the us west coast are at 'safe' levels, this is due more to the fish's ability to shed cesium than the lack of contamination in japanese waters

i would be interested to learn what the levels of cesium of the tuna are in japanese waters
 
Don Quixote said:
while the levels of cesium in the pacific blue-fin tuna found on the us west coast are at 'safe' levels, this is due more to the fish's ability to shed cesium than the lack of contamination in japanese waters

i would be interested to learn what the levels of cesium of the tuna are in japanese waters
Click to expand...

http://www.marketplace.org/topics/world/japans-quake/radiation-fears-haunt-japans-fishing-industry

Japan's once 14 billion dollar commercial fishery has been brought to it's knees by "safe" nuclear power.
 
Rune said:
Nice one Tom.
Put some freaking effort into your lies or stand the fuck off.
20 times the acceptable level is safe to you? With this statement alone you entirely discredit yourself.

As to the BULLSHIT about tuna being overfished, prove it. Now. Do it. Tuna is the single most regulated fish species in the world.

The real reason tuna faces iminent decline is two fold;
1. The atlantic bluefin tuna's sole breeding ground is the Gulf of Mexico, contaminated now by your precious BP's treacherous and unprecedented overuse of dispersants in their criminal attempt to mask the extent of their oil spill.

2. The pacific bluefin tuna population's sole breeding ground is the Sea of Japan, now and likely forever contaminated by "safe" (according to you) nuclear power.

You have made your self into a laughing stock in this thread, as you have done in other similar threads.
Even the suckers don't believe your bullshit anymore.
Click to expand...

Let me ask you a question, if the fishing stocks are forever contaminated as you hilariously assert. Why is it that the fallout from the Pacific nuclear tests of the 50s and early 60s, which was many billions if not trillions of times more radioactive than anything from Fukushima not caused all fishing to be banned.

Let me try to inject some science here, it is sadly needed. 1gm of radium 226 is equal to 1 Curie, there are 3.7×10[SUP]10[/SUP] Becquerels in 1 Curie. In other words, there are 37 billion Becquerels to a Curie, I doubt that there is even one Curie of radiation in all of the tuna in the Japan Sea, you are totally scientifically illiterate and I've no time for idiots.
 
Last edited:
Darla said:
I am sure you know better than everyone else with "scientific credentials" writing on this Tom. It's such a shame that the world's smartest man is stuck posting here...but a real gift for the dozen or so of us reading your posts. Thanks!
Click to expand...

Do you know that you and ID are very similar, she is wedded to religion and intelligent design and you are equally wedded to the religion of eco bullshit.
 
Darla said:
I am sure you know better than everyone else with "scientific credentials" writing on this Tom. It's such a shame that the world's smartest man is stuck posting here...but a real gift for the dozen or so of us reading your posts. Thanks!
Click to expand...

That really seems to be your stchick Darla, when you cannot refute something you resort to sarcasm.
 
Tom is not smart enough to be a shill for oil. He's got his laced panties in a bunch because we mock the backwards criminally negligent shortcutting non dentist going brit oil worker.
 
Aoxomoxoa said:
That really seems to be your stchick Darla, when you cannot refute something you resort to sarcasm.
Click to expand...

Tom I don't know what claim I'm supposed to be refuting. The only claim you made to me is that no one with any scientific knowledge doesn't dismiss wind power out of hand. That's self-refuting. I mean if you are even serious.

Honestly I think you've made yourself a joke on this thread.
 
The Dude said:
Tom is not smart enough to be a shill for oil. He's got his laced panties in a bunch because we mock the backwards criminally negligent shortcutting non dentist going brit oil worker.
Click to expand...

Chevron was very lucky not to have a major blowout off Brazil, I wonder how many toothless Cajun coonasses were on that rig?
 
Darla said:
Tom I don't know what claim I'm supposed to be refuting. The only claim you made to me is that no one with any scientific knowledge doesn't dismiss wind power out of hand. That's self-refuting. I mean if you are even serious.

Honestly I think you've made yourself a joke on this thread.
Click to expand...

I said that wind power is a waste of time, which it is. You don't agree and nothing I can say will change your mind so I'll not bother. It must be very satisfying to have the Cajun clodhopper batting for you!
 
Darla said:
I'm wondering why. We know what's in it for Top, Top has always been very open about it. I wonder what's in it for Tom?
Click to expand...

A valid question.
What is in it for most of the right wingers who oppose most anything that reduces oil consumption?
 
Nuculear wast storage should be underneath each state capitol that has nuclear waste produced in their state.
If it is so safe....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top