Defense Of Marriage Act Ruled Unconstitutional By Second Federal Judge

[Cancel 2018. 3]

Well maybe if you weren't being the same old antagonistic douchenozzle, you'd have seen that Haiku had previously ANSWERED the same question you asked, and he did it in post #15...

i could give a shit. i didn't read post 15 and why in the hell are you bitching about me asking a question. STFU you crybaby.

LOL, i just looked at post #15...here is post 15:

Perv!!!!

who is the douchenozzle now asshole.

:lmao:

 

[Haiku]

and you claim i have reading comprehension issues? LOL...i even underlined it for you.

we need anti-racist legislation

what the fuck do you think your statement means?

We have legislation already that was put in place to prevent racists from discriminating or don't you realize that.

 

[Haiku]

i could give a shit. i didn't read post 15 and why in the hell are you bitching about me asking a question. STFU you crybaby.

LOL, i just looked at post #15...here is post 15:



who is the douchenozzle now asshole.

:lmao:

You're dancing around like a whirling dervish...spinning. Have at it. You can see by my post why I responded...you haven't said anything other than trying to focus attention on yourself. Do you have something to say? If so then out with it.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

We have legislation already that was put in place to prevent racists from discriminating or don't you realize that.

thank you captain obvious. now...if we already have it...why do you claim we need it? and once again...what do you mean by your statement? do you want to make it a crime to be racist? do you want to make it illegal? what do you mean by your statement?

just case you need more help:

what do you mean by your statement?

 

[Haiku]

thank you captain obvious. now...if we already have it...why do you claim we need it? and once again...what do you mean by your statement? do you want to make it a crime to be racist? do you want to make it illegal? what do you mean by your statement?

just case you need more help:

what do you mean by your statement?

We have it for race not for sexual orientation...or didn't you notice. People like you have prevented equality for LGBT people...read the OP or do some research. As has been pointed out to you these questions have already been answered. I don't see where you got the idea in the first place other than your personal beliefs about liberals...which has nothing to do with liberals or what they're saying...just your beliefs about them. Kinda like all Muslims are Islamic radical terrorists...

 

[Granule]

(hint..their interests have nothing to do with the constitution)

Psst! Neither do the California federal judges' interests.

 

[Haiku]

Psst! Neither do the California federal judges' interests.

Well they didn't go out of their way to declare corporations are people...they interpret the rights of equality by the constitution...equal rights is like that. What's a right for you is also a right for them...it used to be that blacks and whites couldn't legally marry in this country...in my lifetime...we all know that making such laws against marriage for integrated couples is wrong...most of us know that preventing LGBT couples from marrying is wrong as well. Religion should have no say in our laws.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

We have it for race not for sexual orientation...or didn't you notice. People like you have prevented equality for LGBT people...read the OP or do some research. As has been pointed out to you these questions have already been answered. I don't see where you got the idea in the first place other than your personal beliefs about liberals...which has nothing to do with liberals or what they're saying...just your beliefs about them. Kinda like all Muslims are Islamic radical terrorists...

what? you said we need "anti racist legislation"....and you still cannot respond to my question about what you meant. you have a serious mental problem.

i have been a supporter of gay marriage for years. i even voted against the bill here in california. before you go off what someone's position is, you better make sure you know what my actual position is.

now, are you capable of addressing your anti racist legislation? here is it again:

.if we already have it...why do you claim we need it? and once again...what do you mean by your statement? do you want to make it a crime to be racist? do you want to make it illegal? what do you mean by your statement?

just case you need more help:

what do you mean by your statement?

 

[zappasguitar]

i could give a shit. i didn't read post 15 and why in the hell are you bitching about me asking a question. STFU you crybaby.

LOL, i just looked at post #15...here is post 15:



who is the douchenozzle now asshole.

:lmao:

Imagine that...while READING THE THREAD...I misread which post contained the pertinent info...it was post # 14...and if you'd read the thread you'd know that too...LOL.

 

[CanceledB]

what? you said we need "anti racist legislation"....and you still cannot respond to my question about what you meant. you have a serious mental problem.

i have been a supporter of gay marriage for years. i even voted against the bill here in california. before you go off what someone's position is, you better make sure you know what my actual position is.

now, are you capable of addressing your anti racist legislation? here is it again:

.if we already have it...why do you claim we need it? and once again...what do you mean by your statement? do you want to make it a crime to be racist? do you want to make it illegal? what do you mean by your statement?

just case you need more help:

what do you mean by your statement?

You're being deliberately obtuse. Haiku stated the need for laws AGAINST the DOMA for the same reason WE NEED (and have) anti-racism legislation (to prevent discrimination). Haiku brought up anti-racism legislation so that dimwitted fuckheads have something to compare why we need legislation barring asinine bullshit like DOMA.

Do you understand why Haiku brought it up now?

 

[CanceledB]

Zappa - love your sig notes.

 

[Granule]

...it used to be that blacks and whites couldn't legally marry in this country...

And that was wrong.

The problem with your argument is lack of relevancy. What you infer is that ALL gays & lesbians are born gay & lesbian, just as ALL blacks are born black. That, my friend, is utter bullshit. Even within in my social circles, I can tell you that is complete bullshit.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

Imagine that...while READING THE THREAD...I misread which post contained the pertinent info...it was post # 14...and if you'd read the thread you'd know that too...LOL.

nope...that was about bullying, not racism.

poor zappa...can't read the thread while bitching about someone else. fact is, he has never answered the question you dishonest tool.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

You're being deliberately obtuse. Haiku stated the need for laws AGAINST the DOMA for the same reason WE NEED (and have) anti-racism legislation (to prevent discrimination). Haiku brought up anti-racism legislation so that dimwitted fuckheads have something to compare why we need legislation barring asinine bullshit like DOMA.

Do you understand why Haiku brought it up now?

how am i being obtuse by asking him what he meant by this statement:

we need anti-racist legislation

he didn't compare it, that is total bullshit.

and no, i don't understand, your reasoning is pure fiction and shows you're an idiot.

 

[CanceledB]

And that was wrong. What you infer is that ALL gays & lesbians are born gay & lesbian, just as ALL blacks are born black. That, my friend, is utter bullshit. Even within in my circles, I can tell you that is complete bullshit.

Nowhere in Haiku's posts is there any inference of any kind, anywhere, regarding gays being born gay or not.

Your post - correct me if I'm wrong - infers that unless and until it can be proven that gays were *born* gay and as a result did not *choose* to be gay, their rights to marry should be different than blacks since blacks were actually *born* black.

Is that what you're inferring?

Because that, my Christian friend, is utter bullshit. Pure, unadulterated, knuckle-dragging, faux Christian bullshit.

 

[Canceled.2014.1]

And that was wrong.

The problem with your argument is lack of relevancy. What you infer is that ALL gays & lesbians are born gay & lesbian, just as ALL blacks are born black. That, my friend, is utter bullshit. Even within in my social circles, I can tell you that is complete bullshit.

I believe that most homosexuals are born that way. But lets say, for the sake of argument, that they are not or that some are not. What difference does that make?

 

[CanceledB]

how am i being obtuse by asking him what he meant by this statement:

we need anti-racist legislation

he didn't compare it, that is total bullshit.

and no, i don't understand, your reasoning is pure fiction and shows you're an idiot.

Well you'll just have to pace the floor and wonder just what the fuck the adults were talking about, then.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

Well you'll just have to pace the floor and wonder just what the fuck the adults were talking about, then.

translation:

nobody knows why in the hell haiku made that statement, or what he meant, so we'll just claim these ethereal adults know what he meant.

TFF

 

[CanceledB]

translation:

nobody knows why in the hell haiku made that statement, or what he meant, so we'll just claim these ethereal adults know what he meant.

TFF

No, Yurt. I got Haiku's point and so did Zappa, and I imagine everyone else who read it. You're the dim bulb here. It's been explained to you three times and still eludes you. Bummer for you.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

no you didn't. you can claim that all day long, but it ain't true. haiku can't even explain what he meant. his response was to a post about bullying...his only actual response about his statement is that we already have it.

he didn't compare it to anything, that is complete bullshit. did you even read his post?