SmarterthanYou
rebel
no fault divorce is a vital staple in the destruction of the nuclear familyYou are very upset that women are allowed to ask for divorce.
no fault divorce is a vital staple in the destruction of the nuclear familyYou are very upset that women are allowed to ask for divorce.
where did it state that there was a prenup?She won't get much, no matter what her lawyers have been telling her; she might get a percentage of what he earned for the 6 months they were married, unless she trumps up 'abuse' charges and other lies and perjures herself. Hopefully the moron had sense enough to buy his houses and other stuff before he married her. They did have a pre-nuptial agreement, in any case. She's a convicted felon, so she probably felt right at home in the pro sport world, anyway. I can never work up any big sympathy for pro athletes and their trophy wife obsessions.
She's a convicted felon,
you would prefer woman be forced to stay married?no fault divorce is a vital staple in the destruction of the nuclear family
in sickness and in health, for richer for poorer, til death do they part.you would prefer woman be forced to stay married?
With marriage it is like a business. If two partners don't want to be in a business they can dissolve the business. Both partners are still liable for any liabilities the business created (debts and kids)in sickness and in health, for richer for poorer, til death do they part.
that sound at all familiar??????????
all too often women cry abuse, which is a lie most of the time, or they just weren't happy anymore. But marriage isn't about happiness, it's about raising families, so if a stupid entitled idiot can't stay married, then don't fucking get married
the problem with modern feminism/feminists, especially in the legal setting, is that the system is geared towards favoring the woman. If a woman decides that after 10 years of marriage and 3 kids, she just isn't happy anymore, she gets the house, half of the marital assets, full custody, child support, and most likely alimony...............this day and age, marriage is nothing but a HUGE L for men.With marriage it is like a business. If two partners don't want to be in a business they can dissolve the business. Both partners are still liable for any liabilities the business created (debts and kids)
But that isn't no fault divorces problem . It is a bias problem slanted towards women and against men.the problem with modern feminism/feminists, especially in the legal setting, is that the system is geared towards favoring the woman. If a woman decides that after 10 years of marriage and 3 kids, she just isn't happy anymore, she gets half of the marital assets, full custody, child support, and most likely alimony...............this day and age, marriage is nothing but a HUGE L for men.
no fault divorces allow that bias to happen. therefore it is a problemBut that isn't no fault divorces problem . It is a bias problem slanted towards women and against men.
Equitable divide does not mean "half." It means fair. Both parties ask for an equitable divide, and then argue over what equitable means.
Basically, it is a place holder. Her lawyer does not want to say an exact amount of money, until discovery can figure out how much money there is, and when it gotten.
The Constitution allows people to petition the government with just about anything. She can ask for a trillion dollars, and the Constitution guarantees her that right.
The bitch wants everything you fool, but will settle for half. That's what it means. THINK.
What makes you believe the law allows this, just because someone asked for it?
In Florida, each member of a marriage gets half of whatever was community property. If one member maintained separate money or belongings they get to keep what they held separate.
There is no alimony for a 6 month marriage in any state that I know of.
You want wives to have no choice. Wives are partners not slaves. If a partner does not want to be with you anymore there is no reason to stay together. Divorce and work out an amicable agreement.no fault divorces allow that bias to happen. therefore it is a problem
Trumpet is right there with you!Don't get married. Don't have sex. Never have children.
-
you appear to not know what I want. wives are partners, but not equal CEOs. Gender roles exist for a reason, which is the success of the nuclear family. If a 'partner' (using that term loosely) does not want to be married anymore, they should have taken greater care in who they decided to marry. IF they just aren't happy any longer, why can the simply not just leave and make their own way without taking half the mans assets that he built up to provide for his family? women don't need men anymore, remember?????????You want wives to have no choice. Wives are partners not slaves. If a partner does not want to be with you anymore there is no reason to stay together. Divorce and work out an amicable agreement.