Why Democrats are afraid to vocalize their Kamala Harris concerns



Pay attention....nobody gave a shit about Gore, Biden, Quayle Chenny, etc and the same with Harris......and that's because the president is the important one...next stupid question, you moron
Biden will be 82 in 2024, older than the average life expectancy of the average male so VP is a critical choice dumbass
 
Last edited:
ft_2022.07.18_harris_01.png
 
You wouldn’t know it just reading this board or following cable news channels but there are people out there who aren’t political ideologies and don’t vote straight party line every election.

There are people out there that voted for Biden simply as an anti-Trump vote. No guarantee they vote Biden again if Trump isn’t the nominee.

Yes, I know many who voted anti-Trump. But Biden was a presidential candidate. I don't think Harris kept anybody from voting for Biden or against Trump even if they did not like her. People like Dan Quayle or Sarah Palin did not stop people from voting for Bush or McCain.

Have you ever voted against a presidential candidate because you didn't like the VP?
 
Yes, I know many who voted anti-Trump. But Biden was a presidential candidate. I don't think Harris kept anybody from voting for Biden or against Trump even if they did not like her. People like Dan Quayle or Sarah Palin did not stop people from voting for Bush or McCain.

Have you ever voted against a presidential candidate because you didn't like the VP?

If the leaders of the Democratic Party felt who the VP is was irrelevant you wouldn’t be seeing these articles out about Harris. The past almost isn’t relevant because we’ve never had an 82 year old run for President. In this scenario the VP role takes on much more added importance.

Additionally, there’s a (probably a very outside) chance Biden doesn’t run again. As VP Harris likely thinks she’s the leading candidate to replace him. I don’t think everyone inside the party feels that way. So again, a reason we could be seeing these articles.
 
Back
Top