When they come for you...

Callinectes said:
What did "due process" look like under the "Deporter-in-chief?" 5.3 million illegal aliens deported in 8 years!



Then why bring the guy back, give him MORE due process than any illegal alien has EVER received, and end up probably letting him go? In El Salvador, it's illegal just to be in one of these gangs, and they're all smushed together with no regard to which gang they're in. Sounds like a win-win for someone who doesn't give a shit about the guy.
Click to expand...
He's not at the supermax prison where the gang members are housed.
 
judges.jpg
 
IBDaMann said:
Yes, you pretending that he will. You are trying to peddle fear and panic. Trump is effectively making America great again and you have to do something. You don't have many tools with which to work so you are delving deeply into a bogus subjunctive fallacy.


So your entire fallacy hinges upon one imagining that he has argued against due process ... and I have no idea why you put the word "illegals" in quotes.


No President gets to decide who is in the country illegaly.


Why would he deport me to the State of my birth?


There are several flaws in your reasoning here.
Click to expand...
Under your theory he could deport you wherever he wants.
 
Callinectes said:
...Because that bill had no teeth, and tater head said his hands were tied without congress. He said that for 4 dang years. Trump gets in and closes the border in a couple weeks, and starts rounding up illegals just by unleashing Tom Homan and Kristi Noem.

This is why he hasn't asked for a new bill. There's no need for one and there never was. It's illegal to enter this country illegally. Enforce the law.
Click to expand...
I don't do text walls. They are boring.

Bullshit. GW Bush said there was a need 20 years ago and I agree with him. Agreed on enforcing laws.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
I don't do text walls. They are boring.
Click to expand...

I just read my "text wall" and timed it with a certified Swiss chronometer synchronized with the U.S. Naval Observatory and the National Institute of Standards and Technology. 2 minutes and 13 seconds. I wasn't speed-reading either, I was reading at my normal pace when I'm looking for mistakes before I hit the "post reply" button. That ain't a text wall.

But I kind of understand now why you lefties are so stubbornly wrong. You lack information, are ate up with TDS, and have the attention span of a goldfish joe biden. (1 minute and 7 seconds read time)

Dutch Uncle said:
Bullshit. GW Bush said there was a need 20 years ago and I agree with him. Agreed on enforcing laws.
Click to expand...

Good example. I was just about to remark that if I can agree with obama on one thing, why can't I disagree with Bush? Then I said to myself "self, that's a knee jerk reaction and you're better than that. Let's just find out what George's immigration "reform" looks like."

Turns out, I agree with him! You probably wouldn't like it though. I find it very "Trumpy".

I would post it here, but it's a REAL text wall and you wouldn't read it anyway. (37 seconds read time)
 
Callinectes said:
I just read my "text wall" and timed it with a certified Swiss chronometer synchronized with the U.S. Naval Observatory and the National Institute of Standards and Technology. 2 minutes and 13 seconds. I wasn't speed-reading either, I was reading at my normal pace when I'm looking for mistakes before I hit the "post reply" button. That ain't a text wall.

But I kind of understand now why you lefties are so stubbornly wrong. You lack information, are ate up with TDS, and have the attention span of a goldfish joe biden. (1 minute and 7 seconds read time)



Good example. I was just about to remark that if I can agree with obama on one thing, why can't I disagree with Bush? Then I said to myself "self, that's a knee jerk reaction and you're better than that. Let's just find out what George's immigration "reform" looks like."

Turns out, I agree with him! You probably wouldn't like it though. I find it very "Trumpy".

I would post it here, but it's a REAL text wall and you wouldn't read it anyway. (37 seconds read time)
Click to expand...
3644959-Robert-A-Heinlein-Quote-It-seems-to-me-that-any-law-that-is-not.jpg


Joke Rob 'em N Bribem proved that in spades. The Left puts that idea into practice regularly.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
3644959-Robert-A-Heinlein-Quote-It-seems-to-me-that-any-law-that-is-not.jpg


Joke Rob 'em N Bribem proved that in spades. The Left puts that idea into practice regularly.
Click to expand...
I don't see how two separate laws can spiritually impact eachother.

Regardless of the fact no one would ever enforce it, i like making restaurants give me free cheese on my apple pie in dane county wisconsin.

Is it a weak law because no one would enforce it or is it a strong law because people will comply besides the fact no one would enforce it?

In the end subjectivity is meaningless.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top