Trump signs BIBLES in ALA, "I couldn't get here fast enough" then to MarALago for $$$

Um, if you don't think there's something wrong with having a man-who-is-not-your-husband-or-doctor writing on your chest, there is nothing I could possibly say that would help you.

hahahahaha.............if a woman requests a signature in a area routinely displayed to the public, what's the problem? Upper chest? Upper back? Tattoo artist guys go to work in more 'discreet' areas that these! LOL!!!!!

square-necklines-2018-248139-1517522083166-main.700x0c.jpg



Opened-back-design-in-boat-neckline-blouse-1.png
 
You would think they would scream sacrilege. It is customary to only have authors sign the books they wrote. This is a new one on me.

It's a new one on us but just the usual narcissistic photo op for trump. Then again he has only passing familiarity with being Christian so he might have thought his action was appropriate.
 
Was something wrong that woman's request?

Exhibit A...the human chest....................seems like there would be enough room.

As a generall rule, I believe the proper response from a gentleman, let alone a President of the United States, is to respond: "Ma'am, I can't sign your body, but my staff will give me something I can sign for you to keep".
 
But online, critics of the president quickly chided him for his impromptu book signing, an act usually reserved for the author or authors of the book in question.
of course.signing a bible by a POTUS is an evil act :palm: -freaking morons
 
As a generally rule, I believe the proper response from a gentleman, let alone a President of the United States, is to respond: "Ma'am, I can't sign your body, but my staff will give me something I can sign for you to keep".

Thank you.

WTF is the purpose of having someone -- a rock star, famous celebrity, athlete, whatever -- sign any part of your skin? Not planning on ever taking a shower ever again? lol
 
It's a new one on us but just the usual narcissistic photo op for trump. Then again he has only passing familiarity with being Christian so he might have thought his action was appropriate.
These people also confuse a signed personalized message in the Bible with an autograph.
 
I remember too. The racist right of NJ didn't want President Obama there.....

dump didn't go to CA after the fires in fact he demonized and attacked CA

Stop making sense. Cons want to pretend that trump didn't tweet out his ignorant and uninformed opinion blaming the victims for that disaster... blaming the victims because that's the way he rolls.

I'd like to see quotes from any other president in history that criticized Americans for being in the middle of a natural disaster.

"There is no reason for these massive, deadly and costly forest fires in California except that forest management is so poor," Trump tweeted. "Billions of dollars are given each year, with so many lives lost, all because of gross mismanagement of the forests. Remedy now, or no more Fed payments!"
 
As a generall rule, I believe the proper response from a gentleman, let alone a President of the United States, is to respond: "Ma'am, I can't sign your body, but my staff will give me something I can sign for you to keep".

There are quite a few men and women who want someone to sign a body part because they then go and have tattoo worked in over it. It's some new craze right now.
Most ask for the signature along the inside of the arm from elbow to wrist.
 
There are quite a few men and women who want someone to sign a body part because they then go and have tattoo worked in over it. It's some new craze right now.
Most ask for the signature along the inside of the arm from elbow to wrist.

You asked for an opinion, and I gave you mine. Maybe I am old school. To me, it is not appropriate decorum or even remotely professional to be signing women's chests. Maybe that kind of thing flies backstage at a rock concert. It would take a bare minimum of grace and effort to have your staff give you something you could sign for the woman.
 
You asked for an opinion, and I gave you mine. Maybe I am old school. To me, it is not appropriate decorum or even remotely professional to be signing women's chests. Maybe that kind of thing flies backstage at a rock concert. It would take a bare minimum of grace and effort to have your staff give you something you could sign for the woman.

Remember when trump said “with the exception of the late, great Abraham Lincoln, I can be more presidential than any president that’s ever held this office” ?

I guess signing chests and Bibles is the new "presidential."
 
You asked for an opinion, and I gave you mine. Maybe I am old school. To me, it is not appropriate decorum or even remotely professional to be signing women's chests. Maybe that kind of thing flies backstage at a rock concert. It would take a bare minimum of grace and effort to have your staff give you something you could sign for the woman.

Hey :) I wouldn't do it myself either..........but we're in the day and age of the "empowered woman" who can do what she wants (or not) with her own body so......... :cool:
 
Remember when trump said “with the exception of the late, great Abraham Lincoln, I can be more presidential than any president that’s ever held this office” ?

I guess signing chests and Bibles is the new "presidential."

He's a stable genius.

Part of me is not surprised in the least that a guy who pursues porn actresses while his wife is giving birth, would find signing women's chests at political rallies to be completely appropriate decorum.
 
Where was your outrage when Obama refused to visit the flood victims in Louisiana? Instead, he decided to play golf. At least Trump took the time visit.

President Obama DID visit Louisiana. He just didn't rush over there and obstruct the emergency responders from doing their job. President Obama ordered emergency relief supplies for the people affected ASAP - like a REAL President does. trump, however, went over there and handed out Lego and spread BS about President Obama playing golf. And fucked in the head republicunt morons believed all that bullshit. And it appears they still do.
 
Hey :) I wouldn't do it myself either..........but we're in the day and age of the "empowered woman" who can do what she wants (or not) with her own body so......... :cool:

Yes we women should be able to do what we want or not with our own bodies. However the republicunts believe that women's bodies are a man's property. And republicunt women don't have a problem having their pussies grabbed or being fucked up the arse.
 
Back
Top