TOP
Retired Teacher
That's your choice...Okay...continue to make it a big deal. I will oblige you.
That's your choice...Okay...continue to make it a big deal. I will oblige you.
Yup, it is indeed.That's your choice...
You cannot call out Domer as an armchair lawyer when you have proven your Valparaiso law school mill degree is worth shit and you make more mistakes on matters of law than anyone else here.on the other hand, I've been correcting your constant mistakes........I love it when armchair lawyers think they know shit........and they're usually right.......all they know is shit.....
That will happen whenYOU are the one continuing this "big deal" with me.
All I have said is that Trump insisted that he was going to testify and didn't.
If it is not a big deal...all you have to say is: You are correct, Ross.
I call out both you AND Domer as arm chair lawyers........Valpo was a widely respected law school when I graduated from there in 1974.......on the other hand, I have no reason to expect that the GED diplomas you both hold qualify you to be anything more than the mindless lib'rul shills you've shown yourselves to be here........I've made no mistakes here......the fact you still think a grand jury verdict holds any meaning opposed to the trial that has already been lost demonstrates you both know absolutely nothing.......You cannot call out Domer as an armchair lawyer when you have proven your Valparaiso law school mill degree is worth shit and you make more mistakes on matters of law than anyone else here.
You graduating from any law school almost certainly means they were exposed as a fraud degree mill after and should be shuttered.I call out both you AND Domer as arm chair lawyers........Valpo was a widely respected law school when I graduated from there in 1974.......on the other hand, I have no reason to expect that the GED diplomas you both hold qualify you to be anything more than the mindless lib'rul shills you've shown yourselves to be here........I've made no mistakes here......the fact you still think a grand jury verdict holds any meaning opposed to the trial that has already been lost demonstrates you both know absolutely nothing.......
economics.......about 45 years after......what happened to the Kum-N-Go after they fired you?.....Tell us, what happened to Valpo after?
yes.....because "allowing defendant's to testify" isn't where the goal posts began........neither of you college rejects understands the fundamental difference between the grand jury and the trial.......no reason the explain it to you again, you didn't understand it before and you never will......And tell us do you stand by your legal reading skills from Valpo and maintain that NYS law does not allow for defendants to testify to a grand jury?
Translation: You have no clue what the difference is. lolyes.....because "allowing defendant's to testify" isn't where the goal posts began........neither of you college rejects understands the fundamental difference between the grand jury and the trial.......no reason the explain it to you again, you didn't understand it before and you never will......
Nobody really believed he would testify, even though he said he would.
Nobody really believes his word is any good, not even the Trumppers.
Trump chickened out of testifying at his trial. He had the perfect opportunity to tell his story, guess he knew it would not help.
He didn't lie...he wasn't needed...
Didn't Valparaiso's Law School almost lose their accreditation, and get severe censorship for letting standards drop in the early 1970's?Valpo was a widely respected law school when I graduated from there in 1974..
It's not a big deal.......yeah and his attorneys (if they still have a functional brainstem) know that if they DID allow him to testify on his own behalf it would decimate the case.
There has been no verdict in the trial, so neither side has lost the trial. If you were a lawyer, you would know that. trump lost the grand jury verdict, which allowed him to be tried.the fact you still think a grand jury verdict holds any meaning opposed to the trial that has already been lost demonstrates you both know absolutely nothing.......
Again, time for another legal lesson ...yes.....because "allowing defendant's to testify" isn't where the goal posts began........neither of you college rejects understands the fundamental difference between the grand jury and the trial.......no reason the explain it to you again, you didn't understand it before and you never will......
He was correct not to take the stand. He would have been embarrassed beyond belief. I'm just pointing out how they believed him when he said he would.This is a story without much meat behind it. It is pretty common for the accused to not take the stand in their trials.
In this case the worst thing is that we WANTED him to so badly because we all knew what raving sh*tshow it would be. It would literally make comedy fortunes for the next few months. Trump would have been in "full Trump Mode" and it would have been fun to watch as an adult man acted like a spoiled toddler with brain damage.
Yup.Translation: You have no clue what the difference is. lol
He was correct not to take the stand. He would have been embarrassed beyond belief. I'm just pointing out how they believed him when he said he would.
Like 99% of his promises made to the Cult, this one turned out to be broken as well. Doesn't matter why. All that matters is the orange shitgibbon will say anything for approval, and the Cultists gulp it down like a DQ frosty, then defends it when the truth is revealed.He was correct not to take the stand. He would have been embarrassed beyond belief. I'm just pointing out how they believed him when he said he would.