Time to once again re-educate idiot libs. The Civil War was NOT about slavery

Buckly J. Ewer said:
The issue here is not what Lincoln did or when he did it.
The issue here is that UFREEDUMB agrees with TDAK his racist pal no matter how fucking stupid he is...
Racists will always stick together.
They have an unspoken code.
Click to expand...

Yes - racists do stick together. All liberals support affirmative action and think jobs should be handed out based on skin color.
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
How could it be about slavery when

1. There were four UNION states that practiced slavery throughout the war. KY MD MO DE. Had 300,000 slaves total.

2. There were many UNION generals who were slave owners. Even Grant had a slave and his wife had a bunch of them.

3. Lincoln asked slave owner Robert E Lee to be commander of all UNION forces.

The idea that the CW was about freeing the slaves is not only wrong, it is preposterous. It's fake news the media has been feeding us for 150 years.
Click to expand...

1. Add to that Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation didn't address them.
 
Craig234 said:
Nice try at a cheap shot, but it's the Republicans, who take Russian help, who gut the Voting Rights Act, who pass voter suppression, who Gerrymander shamelessly, who allow unlimited money in our elections, who are anti-democracy.
Click to expand...

Voter suppression? Are you talking about the claims that black people can't do what white people are very capable of doing when it comes to voter ID?

Gerrymandering? You mean like all those purposely created majority minority districts where the only way many of those elected to represent them could get elected is to provide a guarantee? On a side note, you may find it interesting that several of those majority minority districts that elect a black representative also have a population where more than 20% use food stamps. Or you may not care.
 
CFM said:
Voter suppression? Are you talking about the claims that black people can't do what white people are very capable of doing when it comes to voter ID?

Gerrymandering? You mean like all those purposely created majority minority districts where the only way many of those elected to represent them could get elected is to provide a guarantee? On a side note, you may find it interesting that several of those majority minority districts that elect a black representative also have a population where more than 20% use food stamps. Or you may not care.
Click to expand...

Most Americans on food stamps are white...
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
How could it be about slavery when

1. There were four UNION states that practiced slavery throughout the war. KY MD MO DE. Had 300,000 slaves total.

2. There were many UNION generals who were slave owners. Even Grant had a slave and his wife had a bunch of them.

3. Lincoln asked slave owner Robert E Lee to be commander of all UNION forces.

The idea that the CW was about freeing the slaves is not only wrong, it is preposterous. It's fake news the media has been feeding us for 150 years.
Click to expand...

dude they still don't know that the dems are responsible for the KKK.
 
Craig234 said:
Nice try at a cheap shot, but it's the Republicans, who take Russian help, who gut the Voting Rights Act, who pass voter suppression, who Gerrymander shamelessly, who allow unlimited money in our elections, who are anti-democracy.
Click to expand...

well wasn't it the demolosers who got the Uraninium One deal done? Why would the Russians want them out of office? that is logical.
 
CharacterAssassin said:
No, sugartits, you didn't give any relevant facts and I countered with the actual historical record, which you both didn't know and cannot refute.

Thanks for admitting that you lied and that the civil war was actually about slavery.
Click to expand...

but they were facts and you choose to ignore them as relevant. they're still facts. so dude, you is crazy!!!
 
jc456 said:
but they were facts and you choose to ignore them as relevant. they're still facts. so dude, you is crazy!!!
Click to expand...

They were not relevant facts to the cause of the was as clearly stated by the Southern states themselves.

Sure, they're facts. They're also irrelevant.
 
jc456 said:
well wasn't it the demolosers who got the Uraninium One deal done? Why would the Russians want them out of office? that is logical.
Click to expand...

The 'uranium deal' is a big right-wing propaganda hype, not the primary concern of Russia's foreign policy toward the US. Putin knew Hillary was a hawk toward him, and he really did not want her to be president.
 
Buckly J. Ewer said:
Most Americans on food stamps are white...
Click to expand...

Unless there are 5x as many whites as blacks on them, your statement is meaningless.


I've explained it more than once, boy. 1 in every 3 1/2 blacks are on food stamps. Only 1 in every 12 whites are. If you can't understand how blacks leech on a greater level, you prove you're exactly what you been described as being.
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
How could it be about slavery when

1. There were four UNION states that practiced slavery throughout the war. KY MD MO DE. Had 300,000 slaves total.

2. There were many UNION generals who were slave owners. Even Grant had a slave and his wife had a bunch of them.

3. Lincoln asked slave owner Robert E Lee to be commander of all UNION forces.

The idea that the CW was about freeing the slaves is not only wrong, it is preposterous. It's fake news the media has been feeding us for 150 years.
Click to expand...

Have you been following Jenna Abrams on Twitter, TDAK?

"...in April of last year, Abrams’ tweet baited readers into a debate on slavery.
“To those people, who hate the Confederate flag. Did you know that the flag and the war wasn’t about slavery, it was all about money,” read the tweet."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top