The pernicious progressive plot proceeds

Legion

Oderint dum metuant
Absentee-ballots-Getty-640x480.jpg




If you were still harboring naïve notions of free and fair elections when DEMOCRATS are involved, perhaps this will help disabuse you of those fantasies.


A prominent DEMOCRAT lawyer who represented Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign [Marc Elias] is threatening to sue the state of Nevada unless it immediately suspends prosecutions for ballot harvesting before the June 9 primary, among a slew of other demands.

Writing on April 10 to Nevada Secretary of State Barbara Cegavske, a Republican, Elias first took aim at Nevada Revised Statutes section 293.330(4), which prohibits ballot harvesting and permits only certain individuals, like family members, to return ballots.

Ballot harvesting, or the practice of allowing political operatives and others to collect voters' ballots and turn them in en masse to polling stations, has drawn bipartisan concerns of fraud from election watchers.

  • "We ask that your office and the office of the Nevada Attorney General immediately announce a suspension of prosecutions under this statute for all elections for which mail-in balloting will be the primary means of voting in the state," Elias said.
  • At the same time, Elias called for Nevada to stop throwing out ballots when signatures on voters' ballots appear different from those on voters' registrations, saying "lay election officials have never had the necessary expertise" to make an accurate determination.

Ballot-harvesting is a crime, forbidden due to the inherent opportunities for fraud, intimidation, and outright manufacture of votes.

The DEMOCRATS tried to legalize ballot-harvesting in the last stimulus go-round, but thankfully, they were caught and prevented from doing so.

Worse still, Elias's threats also seek to force Nevada to send a ballot to all registered voters, regardless of whether a voter requested a ballot or not.

As you'll see, Nevada is merely the target du jour.

The same will be expected of all 50 states before November 3, 2020.

This effort is spearheaded by former Clinton attorney Marc Elias, a partner at Perkins Coie law firm, the same firm that facilitated and helped disseminate the fraudulent Steele dossier, which launched the Russian collusion narrative.

Unsurprisingly, Elias was the attorney who engaged Fusion GPS to procure the dossier using funds laundered through Perkins Coie.

Elias is a prime example of all things wrong with the legal profession these days, a poster child for "whatever it takes" lawyerly maneuvering, regardless of ethics or legality.

His involvement also makes it clear that this is no one-off effort concerning Nevada alone.

This well known DEMOCRAT fixer has a long history of fighting voter ID laws in state after state, with his legal challenges bankrolled by none other than George Soros. He is the point of the spear in the left's effort to wrest control of the electoral process from the people of the United States. Having licked his wounds after the 2016 debacle, Elias has emerged again, fighting the same battles, singing the same tunes.

Elias wrote an op-ed for the ultra-liberal Washington Post, published on March 16, 2020. He outlines the same demands he has threatened against Nevada. "It will not be enough for states to simply allow more citizens to vote by mail. Each state must also provide adequate resources for the printing and distribution of millions of extra ballots and to support with extra funds the officials who are tasked with processing and counting the flood of mailed ballots. It will also require states to revisit their laws to provide free postage and community ballot collection. States then need to address the manner in which ballots are verified to minimize rejections based on issues with voters' signatures".

Citing likely difficulties with processing large numbers of mail-in ballots, Elias says:"All votes postmarked by Election Day must be treated as timely and counted in full. Unfortunately, many states do not currently count ballots received after Election Day, regardless of when voters mail them. Replacing Election Day receipt laws with the more intuitive postmarked-by-Election Day standard is essential".

As all DEMOCRATS do, Elias ignores the concept of personal responsibility on the part of the voter, who is naturally expected to consider mailing time when returning his ballot.

What his proposal does is completely different from what he claims that it will do.

It permits the exploitation of exit polling, enabling operatives to dump vast numbers of fraudulent ballots wherever needed on Election Day, having seen from exit polling which races and precincts are going to their opponents.

This cannot be permitted, as it provides specific real-time data to enable election-tampering with a specificity not seen outside of North Korea.

Ideally, states will act to correct these anti-democratic laws. If not, Congress should step in and amend federal law to make clear that ballots mailed by a voter on or before Election Day must be treated as cast on Election Day.

In his own words, Elias reveals the framework for stealing an election. Create avenues for mischief, then exploit those avenues for all they're worth.

Remembering that by threatening endless lawsuits over clearly fraudulent ballots, it's not too difficult to intimidate a county election commissioner into matching voter registration signatures against received ballot signatures with a very broad standard to avoid litigation that could bankrupt post-COVID budgets.

The pattern is clear.

Force a mail-in ballot scenario, suspend prohibitions against ballot-harvesting (citing reasons of health and safety, of course), and then find judges in each state to forbid the invalidating of ballots where the signatures do not match the registration.

Apart from simply declaring themselves the winner at the end of a rifle barrel, the DEMOCRATS couldn't possibly have devised a more direct path to hijacking an election.

This is the greatest danger we face in 2020 — not the virus, not North Korea, not even the economic effects of the virus, but rather the clear intention of one party to steal an election by any means necessary.

Don't be distracted: this is one issue you must not let lie fallow. They are arranging for the invalidation of your vote, right in front of your eyes.

We must prevent these changes, or, like a miraculous resurrection of Lenin, we will see the whole country "turn" blue November 3.




https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/04/stealing_the_election_in_plain_sight.html
 
posted polling probably proves problematic, pending possible proles posing perniciously as plebescite.....politicians, please pass prohibitions promptly........
 
posted polling probably proves problematic, pending possible proles posing perniciously as plebescite.....politicians, please pass prohibitions promptly........

Sadly, many people don't seem to see the danger.



Force a mail-in ballot scenario, suspend prohibitions against ballot-harvesting (citing reasons of health and safety, of course), and then find judges in each state to forbid the invalidating of ballots where the signatures do not match the registration.

Apart from simply declaring themselves the winner at the end of a rifle barrel, the DEMOCRATS couldn't possibly have devised a more direct path to hijacking an election.

This is the greatest danger we face in 2020 — not the virus, not North Korea, not even the economic effects of the virus, but rather the clear intention of one party to steal an election by any means necessary.

Don't be distracted: this is one issue you must not let lie fallow.

They are arranging for the invalidation of your vote, right in front of your eyes.

We must prevent these changes, or, like a miraculous resurrection of Lenin, we will see the whole country "turn" blue November 3.





https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/04/stealing_the_election_in_plain_sight.html
 
The California law is the model for the DEMOCRAT push in all 50 states


DEMOCRATS AIM TO STEAL THE ELECTION


California’s AB 1921, signed into law by Gov. Moonbeam Brown in September 2016, says: “A vote by mail voter who is unable to return the ballot may designate any person to return the ballot to the elections official from whom it came or to the precinct board at a polling place within the jurisdiction. The ballot must, however, be received by either the elections official from whom it came or the precinct board before the close of the polls on election day.”

A watchdog group voiced concerns about how this would play out before the bill was ever passed: "AB 1921 would allow anybody to walk into an elections office and hand over truckloads of vote by mail envelopes with ballots inside, no questions asked, no verified records kept. It amounts to an open invitation to large-scale vote buying, voter coercion, “granny farming”, and automated forgery".



https://www.redstate.com/mirandamorales/2018/10/16/ca-dem-party-sinking-new-lows-harvest-absentee-ballots/
 
6a00d83451bab869e20120a672dc12970c-pi



Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., and Ron Wyden, D-Ore., have introduced legislation to promote and help fund mail-in ballot efforts.

“In light of the threats that this virus poses, every American should be able to cast a ballot by mail without excuse,” Klobuchar and Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del., wrote, urging Congress to include funding for mail-in elections in emergency packages. “That means states will have to scale their vote-by-mail processes in a way that hasn’t been done before.”

https://www.propublica.org/article/voting-by-mail-would-reduce-coronavirus-transmission-but-it-has-other-risks
 
There is a movement afoot to junk in-person voting, the manner by which the vast majority of American ballots have been cast since before the American Revolution.

The radicals behind this, aided by Nancy Pelosi at the federal level, and echoed by DEMOCRAT elected officials in a number of states, are using the pandemic panic as cover for bald-faced partisan skullduggery.

They’re exploiting the pandemic to instill fear in our electoral process, forcing a solution for a problem that doesn’t exist — namely, that people shouldn't be able to got to the polls because of the coronavirus.

This is a patently false assumption, as other countries have learned in similar crises.

And, it was not the case in America in 1918 during the outbreak of Spanish Flu pandemic.

Transparently, the motive behind junking in-person voting this November is that liberals believe doing so will help them win.

Pelosi even tried to hold America hostage with a wish-list of long-standing electioneering aims, including same-day voter registration, legalized “ballot harvesting,” and mandatory early mail-in voting.

Fortunately, Congress stymied that scheme.

Had Pelosi gotten her way, states would effectively have been forced to abandon the common-sense measures they currently have in place, which prevent fraudulent voting, while extending the 2020 elections from one day to a month-long process.

Political strategists on the left believe this will help them defeat President Trump, regain the majority in the Senate, and keep Pelosi Speaker.

Despite Pelosi’s setback on Capitol Hill, the left’s crusade to radically transform the very nature of the coming elections continues unabated, with liberal activist groups trying to advance Pelosi’s fumble.

The partisan motives behind these recent electoral “reform” proposals, along with the manifest opportunities for voter fraud and coercion they present — such as giving partisan activists absolute control over physical ballots — are reason enough to oppose them.

But there’s another glaring issue that’s worth pointing out: contrary to their proponents’ efforts to present them as a necessary concession to the coronavirus pandemic, new voting procedures are clearly unnecessary from a public health perspective.

The United States has the world’s most mature and developed democratic system and an extraordinary amount of resources to tackle the problems the coronavirus creates. This pandemic isn’t even uncharted ground.

The bipartisan International Foundation for Electoral Systems (IFES), has been involved in similar situations before around the globe. While IFES is not involved in domestic elections, it is recognized internationally as a leader in election administration.

In 2014, as the Ebola virus raged in West Africa, the country of Liberia was slated to hold a crucial election.

Some argued that in-person voting should be suspended, but that could have thrown the legitimacy of the results into question due to the possibility of widespread fraud.

Instead, IFES was able to help develop protocols for voters and poll workers that kept them safe while allowing Liberians to participate in a free, fair, and in-person election.

That was the right call in Liberia.

Maintaining electoral continuity almost always is. If the rules of the game are allowed to change at the last minute — especially in a way that seems to benefit one political party over its opposition — democracy itself is cheapened and de-legitimized.

If Liberia was able to safely hold an in-person election amidst a Ebola outbreak, there is no reason we cannot do so here in the United States.



https://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/ken-blackwell/dont-let-democrats-exploit-covid-19-rig-election
 
Back
Top