The Democratic wave is growing, just how big will it be?

katzgar said:
you opioid addled trumpsters are morons. clinton in fact received the most votes. Why are facts so hard for you? The polls said she would receive the most votes and she did. Maybe try for a coherent post in the future. And just so you know I have lived in LA for just shy of 3 years but hey being a moron is your thing.
Click to expand...

Ahhhh, I see. Pollsters don't predict who will win the presidency they just predict who will win the popular vote. Makes sense. Why predict what matters right?
 
LV426 said:
Exactly.

That is what Conservatives do; employ the "No True Scotsman" defense so they don't have to be held to account for the failure of their policies and politicians.

They will most assuredly do it again.
Click to expand...

(while you support every stupid thing they try to do)


sorry dude I fucked up

I thought this was a cowacko post


YOU are spot on
 
Last edited:
cawacko said:
Ahhhh, I see. Pollsters don't predict who will win the presidency they just predict who will win the popular vote. Makes sense. Why predict what matters right?
Click to expand...

why do you refuse the decades long cold hard court records that Prove the republican party cheats in elections to destroy true democracy?
 
cawacko said:
Ahhhh, I see. Pollsters don't predict who will win the presidency they just predict who will win the popular vote. Makes sense. Why predict what matters right?
Click to expand...


you should think bedfore you post your stupidity but I know thinking isnt your style.
 
I think the Democrats will probably pick up between 30-50 seats in the House, and might net out +1 or +2 in the Senate. Recent Senate polling in red seats like TN, NV, AZ, and even MS, show Democrats either ahead or breaking even.

The real story is going to be at the state level...there, I think Democrats are going to clean up bigly. There are 25 governorships up in 2018, and I think Democrats have a real shot at flipping most of the red ones thanks to poor Conservative candidates and policies.
 
evince said:
soon they will all claim they didn't vote for trumpy

just like none of them voted for Bush

or Robmoney
Click to expand...

no way. trump is way different than bush or romney. or mccain. in those cases people were voting for them in spite of the democrats. people are voting FOR trump. trump is a whole other beast.
 
Irthriuth said:
no way. trump is way different than bush or romney. or mccain. in those cases people were voting for them in spite of the democrats. people are voting FOR trump. trump is a whole other beast.
Click to expand...

'Beast' sums it up perfectly .. and I like that Trumpsters like you live in the dark. No clue what's coming.

It'll be a surprise.
 
blackascoal said:
'Beast' sums it up perfectly .. and I like that Trumpsters like you live in the dark. No clue what's coming.

It'll be a surprise.
Click to expand...

I am apparently much more informed than you are. Again, just like 2016, you are the one that is clueless. I am not saying dems wont take the house. it's very likely. 66% likely in fact. But 33% is still a very high number for republicans to pull off keeping the house. This is basic data and statistics, and your arrogance or lack of understanding of this doesn't do you or your side any favors. your arrogance last election might have cost you, as you assumed it was all locked up and inevitable clinton would win, and you got bitchslapped.

I wont be surprised at all if dems take the house. The opposition party almost always wins more seats in the midterm election. You on the otherhand will be blasted into the stratsophere if republicans keep control, and i'll be here laughing in your face if republicans roll a 5 or a 6 with you thinking such a thing is impossible.
 
blackascoal said:
Washington (CNN)With Labor Day rapidly approaching, one thing is becoming clear: All signs point to the Democratic wave growing rather than shrinking in the final weeks of the 2018 election.
Click to expand...

If the "wave" doesn't result in all Trumpanzees being purged, it won't have been big enough to suit me.
 
tell you what BAC, lets find an escrow. I'll put money on it with you. Since you are so confident, give me odds. You seem to think republicans don't even have a 10% chance of keeping the house. Lets make it 5:1 with you giving me odds. I'll bet you up to 2k on my end. your 10k vs. my 2k. lets do it bitch. put your money where your mouth is. I want the free equity.
 
Irthriuth said:
tell you what BAC, lets find an escrow. I'll put money on it with you. Since you are so confident, give me odds. You seem to think republicans don't even have a 10% chance of keeping the house. Lets make it 5:1 with you giving me odds. I'll bet you up to 2k on my end. your 10k vs. my 2k. lets do it bitch. put your money where your mouth is. I want the free equity.
Click to expand...

As a gambling man myself I'd love to see this bet. Money is the ultimate put up or shut up.
 
So BAC, it's stupid to say pollsters were wrong about the 2016 election because they don't predict the EC they only predict the popular vote?
 
Sailor said:
Smart money stopped believing polls after the last Presidential election.
Click to expand...

Well, the polls were right. Clinton did win the majority of the popular vote by about 3%, and the polls were done at the national level and the average lead Clinton had in those national polls was about +3%. So the polls do tell a story, and that story showed Clinton did win the popular vote by nearly the same margin all the polls had her winning by.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top