Sickening leaked Russian spy emails show Putin planned 'total cleansing' of Ukraine

A talk on "Putins Brain":

Is Dugin Fascist, Neo Marxist, or What? | Stephen Hicks at the Museum of the Second WW

I have not made up my mind on how well Hicks sees.....but I keep listening.
 
Hawkeye10 said:
You throwing yet another temper tantrum is not going to help.
Click to expand...

This might help though, it's about time that the Chinks were made to suffer bigly for supplying the Russians weapons in Ukraine Their big hopes for the C919 should be dashed by cutting off supplies of the LEAP-1C manufactured by CFM International.

An expert's point of view on a current event.

If China Arms Russia, the U.S. Should Kill China’s Aircraft Industry

Beijing’s aerospace future is uniquely dependent on Western companies. U.S. and EU trade sanctions could bring its indigenous aviation sector to a halt.
By Richard Aboulafia, a managing director at AeroDynamic Advisory.

As Chinese President Xi Jinping meets in Moscow with Russian President Vladimir Putin this week, the war in Ukraine will be high on the agenda. While the Chinese leader might pressure Russia to pursue a peace deal, there are also worries in Western capitals that the authoritarian allies could agree to work together more closely.

A Chinese decision to provide Russia with weapons would change the world. Only China has the stockpiles and industrial capacity to replace Russia’s ruinous equipment losses in its war against Ukraine. Worse, it would help cement a Russia–China alliance, one pitted against Western interests. U.S. President Joe Biden and other Western leaders have warned China’s leadership that providing lethal technologies to Russia, on top of the non-lethal aid already provided, would have serious consequences.

Indeed, the West does have some leverage. One option would be to bring China’s commercial aircraft industry to a halt, thereby striking a blow against Beijing’s economic, technological, and transport aspirations. It would be a major blow to Xi’s prestige, too, since he has made technological self-sufficiency a key priority for the country.

The aviation industry is not just a matter of pride; it is foundational to China’s infrastructure and an essential mode of transport for many middle-class Chinese. According to the World Bank, passenger air traffic in China grew more than tenfold between 2000 and the 2019 peak, from 62 million passengers to 660 million passengers.

The exponential growth in passenger numbers has made China a major customer for Western-made jets: based on manufacturer-reported numbers, in 2000, China took 2 percent of world jetliner production. In 2018, the peak year for imports, it took 23 percent of world jetliner production.

The United States and its allies have already decided to decouple from China when it comes to semiconductors and telecommunications systems. Jetliner manufacturing would be a logical next step. After all, China’s vaunted commercial transports—the MA700 regional turboprop transport, ARJ21 regional jet, C919 narrow-body passenger plane, and proposed CR929 wide-body are heavily dependent upon imported Western technologies and systems.

While China wants to develop home-grown substitutes for these imported components, ultimately creating purely Chinese jets, this will be a very long road. Besides, modern jet producers rely on purchases of best-in-class technologies from a globalized industry; autarky is a very bad way to run a jetliner industry. Even the U.S. jetliner industry has long been wedded to industrial partners in Canada, France, Japan, the U.K., and many other countries.

Engines are the weakest link in China’s civil aviation plans. Airframes and aircraft systems and technologies may be difficult to develop, but jet engines are at a completely different level in terms of barriers to entry. In fact, only three companies, located in two countries (General Electric (GE) and Raytheon/Pratt & Whitney in the United States and Rolls-Royce in the U.K.) build commercial jet engines. France’s Safran plays a role as a partner to GE in the CFM joint venture, but otherwise there are no other sourcing options.

Russia could not become a jet engine supplier option for China. The Soviet Union had a second-rate commercial engine industry for mostly domestic applications, but Russia’s efforts to revive it have been uncertain and very slow. Today, Russia remains completely dependent on Western aircraft and engines; it has only been able to keep its existing aircraft flying by illegally evading sanctions.

Only tiny numbers of obsolete Russian models have been manufactured over the last few decades. There are plans for new engines, but international sanctions, massive corruption, and the brain drain of the last year have likely doomed whatever chances Russia’s commercial aviation engine industry once had. Besides, the priority is now military systems.

As a consequence of the limited number of jet engine suppliers, the Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China’s (COMAC) ARJ21 regional jet and C919 are both powered by GE or GE/Safran engines, imported from the United States. For the ARJ21, there is no backup plan to GE’s CF34 engine.

For the C919, China is developing its CJ-1000A engine as an alternative to the GE/Safran Leap-1C, but it won’t enter service until the end of the decade. And the CJ-1000A is also heavily dependent upon key imported Western technologies. Like China’s jetliners, China’s first attempt at a commercial engine could easily be shut down with technology embargoes.

https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/03/20/china-russia-aircraft-comac-xi-putin/
 
Last edited:
serendipity said:
This might help though, it's about time that the Chinks were made to suffer bigly for supplying the Russians weapons in Ukraine Their big hopes for the C919 should be dashed by cutting off supplies of the LEAP-1C manufactured by CFM International.

An expert's point of view on a current event.

If China Arms Russia, the U.S. Should Kill China’s Aircraft Industry

Beijing’s aerospace future is uniquely dependent on Western companies. U.S. and EU trade sanctions could bring its indigenous aviation sector to a halt.
By Richard Aboulafia, a managing director at AeroDynamic Advisory.

As Chinese President Xi Jinping meets in Moscow with Russian President Vladimir Putin this week, the war in Ukraine will be high on the agenda. While the Chinese leader might pressure Russia to pursue a peace deal, there are also worries in Western capitals that the authoritarian allies could agree to work together more closely.

A Chinese decision to provide Russia with weapons would change the world. Only China has the stockpiles and industrial capacity to replace Russia’s ruinous equipment losses in its war against Ukraine. Worse, it would help cement a Russia–China alliance, one pitted against Western interests. U.S. President Joe Biden and other Western leaders have warned China’s leadership that providing lethal technologies to Russia, on top of the non-lethal aid already provided, would have serious consequences.

Indeed, the West does have some leverage. One option would be to bring China’s commercial aircraft industry to a halt, thereby striking a blow against Beijing’s economic, technological, and transport aspirations. It would be a major blow to Xi’s prestige, too, since he has made technological self-sufficiency a key priority for the country.

The aviation industry is not just a matter of pride; it is foundational to China’s infrastructure and an essential mode of transport for many middle-class Chinese. According to the World Bank, passenger air traffic in China grew more than tenfold between 2000 and the 2019 peak, from 62 million passengers to 660 million passengers.

The exponential growth in passenger numbers has made China a major customer for Western-made jets: based on manufacturer-reported numbers, in 2000, China took 2 percent of world jetliner production. In 2018, the peak year for imports, it took 23 percent of world jetliner production.

The United States and its allies have already decided to decouple from China when it comes to semiconductors and telecommunications systems. Jetliner manufacturing would be a logical next step. After all, China’s vaunted commercial transports—the MA700 regional turboprop transport, ARJ21 regional jet, C919 narrow-body passenger plane, and proposed CR929 wide-body are heavily dependent upon imported Western technologies and systems.

While China wants to develop home-grown substitutes for these imported components, ultimately creating purely Chinese jets, this will be a very long road. Besides, modern jet producers rely on purchases of best-in-class technologies from a globalized industry; autarky is a very bad way to run a jetliner industry. Even the U.S. jetliner industry has long been wedded to industrial partners in Canada, France, Japan, the U.K., and many other countries.

Engines are the weakest link in China’s civil aviation plans. Airframes and aircraft systems and technologies may be difficult to develop, but jet engines are at a completely different level in terms of barriers to entry. In fact, only three companies, located in two countries (General Electric (GE) and Raytheon/Pratt & Whitney in the United States and Rolls-Royce in the U.K.) build commercial jet engines. France’s Safran plays a role as a partner to GE in the CFM joint venture, but otherwise there are no other sourcing options.

Russia could not become a jet engine supplier option for China. The Soviet Union had a second-rate commercial engine industry for mostly domestic applications, but Russia’s efforts to revive it have been uncertain and very slow. Today, Russia remains completely dependent on Western aircraft and engines; it has only been able to keep its existing aircraft flying by illegally evading sanctions.

Only tiny numbers of obsolete Russian models have been manufactured over the last few decades. There are plans for new engines, but international sanctions, massive corruption, and the brain drain of the last year have likely doomed whatever chances Russia’s commercial aviation engine industry once had. Besides, the priority is now military systems.

As a consequence of the limited number of jet engine suppliers, the Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China’s (COMAC) ARJ21 regional jet and C919 are both powered by GE or GE/Safran engines, imported from the United States. For the ARJ21, there is no backup plan to GE’s CF34 engine.

For the C919, China is developing its CJ-1000A engine as an alternative to the GE/Safran Leap-1C, but it won’t enter service until the end of the decade. And the CJ-1000A is also heavily dependent upon key imported Western technologies. Like China’s jetliners, China’s first attempt at a commercial engine could easily be shut down with technology embargoes.

https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/03/20/china-russia-aircraft-comac-xi-putin/
Click to expand...

America is in collapse, Europe is very near collapse...You fail to understand reality.
 
serendipity said:
It is truly nauseating observing this not very useful idiot, day after day spewing out more and more dezinformatsiya. From the article.


A source within the FSB leaked the emails to Vladimir Osechkin, founder of anti-Russian torture network Gulagu, which reveals the genocidal plan Putin had for Ukraine had they not so stiffly resisted his invasion.

According to The Sun, the FSB source says the intelligence agency was going to be assisted by the Russian military during the “total cleansing” of Ukraine’s social fabric.

“And after all this, we could install any government in Kyiv,” said the source.
Click to expand...

The Russians were intent upon de-Nazifying Ukraine, maggot- as they openly stated. No need all for ' undercover 'Daily Express tub thumping mendacity.

Now you can deny the existence of Neo-Nazism in Ukraine and give every intelligent observer a good laugh.


Haw, haw....................................haw.

th


th


th
 
moon said:
You truly are a pompous idiot.

Porkeye is the philosopher- you're the floundering asshole.

Haw, haw...................................haw.
Click to expand...

Let's just be sure that everyone knows you support the raping of underage schoolgirls by Russian soldiers, alles klar?
 
moon said:
The Russians were intent upon de-Nazifying Ukraine, maggot- as they openly stated. No need all for ' undercover 'Daily Express tub thumping mendacity.

Now you can deny the existence of Neo-Nazism in Ukraine and give every intelligent observer a good laugh.


Haw, haw....................................haw.

th
Click to expand...

That was mostly bullshit dezinformatsiya
for the consumption of useless twats like you.
 
serendipity said:
Let's just be sure that everyone knows you support the raping of underage schoolgirls by Russian soldiers, alles klar?
Click to expand...

I object to all forms of rape, maggot. You appear to qualify your objections.

serendipity said:
That was mostly bullshit dezinformatsiya
for the consumption of useless twats like you.
Click to expand...

No, maggot- the facts of Ukrainian Neo-Nazism are well established. Your Daily Express horseshit is just another attempt to slither out from under that crushing mountain of guilt. No way, numpty.



Haw, haw................................................haw.


th


th



.....................and thousands more.
 
The Svoboda Party in Ukraine is often called neo-fascist. They have one member of parliament and nobody in the government.

Is that why Putin invaded Ukraine - to remove that one member of parliament? So far he hasn't managed it.
 
Tranquillus in Exile said:
The Svoboda Party in Ukraine is often called neo-fascist. They have one member of parliament and nobody in the government.

Is that why Putin invaded Ukraine - to remove that one member of parliament? So far he hasn't managed it.
Click to expand...

The Russians killed many Ukrainian Neo-Nazis at Mariopol. Relax though, plenty left.
 
I'll wait a few weeks to comment on this one as it could be a disinformation campaign. It's not like it's going to go away or anything, so waiting to see what happens with it for a few weeks is worth it rather than accepting it at face value. After all, this comes in the middle of a war for Russia...
 
moon said:
The Russians killed many Ukrainian Neo-Nazis at Mariopol. Relax though, plenty left.
Click to expand...

Notice this cunt never mentions the truly bestial Wagner mercenaries in the pay of the Russians. They are believed to number up to 50,000 and will stop at nothing to kill, maim and rape Ukrainians. They are true fascists without any question or doubt.
 
serendipity said:
Notice this cunt never mentions the truly bestial Wagner mercenaries in the pay of the Russians. They are believed to number up to 50,000 and will stop at nothing to kill, maim and rape Ukrainians. They are true fascists without any question or doubt.
Click to expand...

Indeed.

 
serendipity said:
Notice this cunt never mentions the truly bestial Wagner mercenaries in the pay of the Russians. They are believed to number up to 50,000 and will stop at nothing to kill, maim and rape Ukrainians. They are true fascists without any question or doubt.
Click to expand...

Set a thief to catch a thief, maggot.

Biden should have been warned about Russia's response before he went to war with Russia. Your Tory assholes should never have interfered in a local dispute either. Now you've enabled justification for Russian nukes in Belarus. Just how stupid is your government ? You could have had anti-war, anti-NATO Jeremy Corbyn. Now look at ya


Haw, haw.....................................haw.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top