Should Trump be added to Rushmore?

[Uncensored2008]

And I posted a lot of links showing you it wasn't that high MORON.

You cherry picked a poll from BlueSky - I give you the average from a dozen national polls.

You lied - you got busted.

You're a democrat - which means you're evil, and you're stupid. Your nature is to lie - but you're going to be caught every single time.

 

[martin]

You could always kill yourself.

It's the intelligent level of our Right wingers that always shines through.

 

[Damocles]

Why would we put a sex predictor along side great men??????

I don't know, those predictors and other prognosticators are "witches" and you Christian folk aren't supposed to suffer them to live.. Didn't Jefferson have his way with a slave? I wonder if he was predicting sex too.

 

[Damocles]

so that is still higher then Trumps 34%.

RCP average has Trump at 45.9% I think you've mistaken the Congresscritter polls for Trump's polls.

 

[Tbird19482]

You cherry picked a poll from BlueSky - I give you the average from a dozen national polls.

You lied - you got busted.

You're a democrat - which means you're evil, and you're stupid. Your nature is to lie - but you're going to be caught every single time.

NO I posted a link that had a LOT of articles in it LEARN TO READ,

 

[AProudLefty]

I don't know, those predictors and other prognosticators are "witches" and you Christian folk aren't supposed to suffer them to live.. Didn't Jefferson have his way with a slave? I wonder if he was predicting sex too.

Sex predictors were a thing. Thought you knew that?

 

[FastLane]

It's the intelligent level of our Right wingers that always shines through.

Just a suggestion.

 

[Nomad]

Trump is the most transformative President of our time. He deserves to be on Rushmore.

Any idiots who believe that should be UNDER Mt Rushmore.

 

[FastLane]

NO I posted a link that had a LOT of articles in it LEARN TO READ,

Which one SPECIFICALLY proves your point and where exactly does it say if?

 

[Uncensored2008]

NO I posted a link that had a LOT of articles in it LEARN TO READ,

I don't care about leftist hate sites.

I provided you the aggregate of national polls with links to every single one of them.

Learn to think.

 

[FastLane]

Sex predictors were a thing. Thought you knew that?

What predictions?

 

[AProudLefty]

What predictions?

It's a joke. See Damo's post.

 

[QP!]

I guess you have not read the Durham annex have you. And the Rubio led report was based on the new ICA which was based on the discredited Steele dossier. Seriously you really do need to read the newly declassified documents that Tulsi released. Because your argument just makes you look dumb. And remind me again what Mueller said about Trump colluding with the Russians .

I read the entirety of the Durham report and there is nothing there that you can quote (but go ahead, i dare you) that goes against his core findings which found no wrong doing. His main conclusions were 'there are things he would have done differently' and that is about it.

And no, the Senate committee report was NOT based on ICA and was far reaching and even more exhaustive than Mueller. They cited MANY areas of investigation ALL leading them to the same cystal clear conclusion that Russia did intefere in an attempt to help Trump. That is unquestioned from their report and your lies will not work here.

Tulsi released NOTHING, that changes anything, and you will not quote any of it here (but go ahead i dare you) because you know if you do it will be instantly shown as the garbage and spin it is.

Mueller said that Russia absolutely did interfere in our election and did so with the goal of helping Trump campaign and hurting CLinton one.

 

[FastLane]

I read the entirety of the Durham report and there is nothing there that you can quote (but go ahead, i dare you) that goes against his core findings which found no wrong doing. His main conclusions were 'there are things he would have done differently' and that is about it.

And no, the Senate committee report was NOT based on ICA and was far reaching and even more exhaustive than Mueller. They cited MANY areas of investigation ALL leading them to the same cystal clear conclusion that Russia did intefere in an attempt to help Trump. That is unquestioned from their report and your lies will not work here.

Tulsi released NOTHING, that changes anything, and you will not quote any of it here (but go ahead i dare you) because you know if you do it will be instantly shown as the garbage and spin it is.

Mueller said that Russia absolutely did interfere in our election and did so with the goal of helping Trump campaign and hurting CLinton one.

The Senate based their report on the ICA they DID NOT do their own investigating.
Today, Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and Vice Chairman Mark Warner (D-VA) released a new report, titled “Review of the Intelligence Community Assessment,” the fourth and penultimate volume in the Committee’s bipartisan Russia investigation.

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov...el-community-assessment-russian-interference/

The latest installment examines the sources, tradecraft, and analytic work behind the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) that determined Russia conducted an unprecedented, multi-faceted campaign to interfere with the 2016 U.S. presidential election. The installment builds upon the Committee’s unclassified summary findings on the ICA issued in July 2018.

Are you saying you read the recently declassified and released Durham report ANNEX?

 

[Uncensored2008]

I don't know, those predictors and other prognosticators are "witches" and you Christian folk aren't supposed to suffer them to live.. Didn't Jefferson have his way with a slave? I wonder if he was predicting sex too.

Zero evidence to support the claim that Thomas Jefferson had sexual relations with Sally Hemming. Someone in the Jefferson family did - from his brothers, sons, nephews, grandsons, grandnephews. The possibilities are in the hundreds.

I know you're posting sarcasm - but the lefties don't grasp it.

 

[QP!]

The Senate based their report on the ICA they DID NOT do their own investigating.
Today, Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and Vice Chairman Mark Warner (D-VA) released a new report, titled “Review of the Intelligence Community Assessment,” the fourth and penultimate volume in the Committee’s bipartisan Russia investigation.

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov...el-community-assessment-russian-interference/





Are you saying you read the recently declassified and released Durham report ANNEX?

LIES.

ChatGPT quick query shows the lies and each claim below is easily verifiable by google search.

.​

--------------------

• Beyond the ICA review, the Committee conducted its own multi-year investigation (2017–2020).
• They:
  
  • Collected hundreds of witness interviews (classified and unclassified).
  • Reviewed millions of pages of documents from U.S. government agencies, the Trump campaign, social media companies, and others.
  • Issued five volumes covering different aspects of Russian interference, the Trump campaign’s interactions with Russians, and vulnerabilities in the election system.
• Much of the investigative work in Volumes 1–3 and 5 had little to do with the ICA review — it involved their own fact-finding.

Bottom line:
The Senate report drew overall on a much broader investigation — involving their own interviews, subpoenas, document reviews, and separate analysis of Russian activities, social media operations, and potential vulnerabilities in the election process. The ICA review was one part of a five-volume, multi-year inquiry, not the sole basis for the Senate’s findings.

 

[Tbird19482]

Which one SPECIFICALLY proves your point and where exactly does it say if?

Most of them do read some of them and learn something.

 

[FastLane]

LIES.

ChatGPT quick query shows the lies and each claim below is easily verifiable by google search.

.​

--------------------

• Beyond the ICA review, the Committee conducted its own multi-year investigation (2017–2020).
• They:
  • Collected hundreds of witness interviews (classified and unclassified).
  • Reviewed millions of pages of documents from U.S. government agencies, the Trump campaign, social media companies, and others.
  • Issued five volumes covering different aspects of Russian interference, the Trump campaign’s interactions with Russians, and vulnerabilities in the election system.
• Much of the investigative work in Volumes 1–3 and 5 had little to do with the ICA review — it involved their own fact-finding.

Bottom line:
The Senate report drew overall on a much broader investigation — involving their own interviews, subpoenas, document reviews, and separate analysis of Russian activities, social media operations, and potential vulnerabilities in the election process. The ICA review was one part of a five-volume, multi-year inquiry, not the sole basis for the Senate’s findings.

But YOU said the Senate did not use the 2017 ICA. Clearly they did rely on the now debunked report.

 

[Trumpet]

I don't know, those predictors and other prognosticators are "witches" and you Christian folk aren't supposed to suffer them to live.. Didn't Jefferson have his way with a slave? I wonder if he was predicting sex too.

Are you suggesting that Crazy Trump's sexual exploitation of young women should be over looked?????

 

[FastLane]

Most of them do read some of them and learn something.

Learn how to properly document your arguments sweetheart.