Manifesto Released: He Believed All the Lies the Democrats Now Claim They Never Said

[volsrocks]

Manifesto Released: He Believed All the Lies the Democrats Now Claim They Never Said​

Manifesto Released: He Believed All the Lies the Democrats Now Claim They Never Said

Analysis of the assassination attempt and the rhetoric fueling political violence in the Democratic Party.

hotair.com

It is and has been the despicable tactic from the left.

Inflammatory rhetoric about President Trump then sit back and wait for some unhinged lunatic to act out and hope he hits

 

[Grim Reaper]

Manifesto Released: He Believed All the Lies the Democrats Now Claim They Never Said​

Manifesto Released: He Believed All the Lies the Democrats Now Claim They Never Said

Analysis of the assassination attempt and the rhetoric fueling political violence in the Democratic Party.

hotair.com

It is and has been the despicable tactic from the left.

Inflammatory rhetoric about President Trump then sit back and wait for some unhinged lunatic to act out and hope he hits

HotAir is an opinion site, not a source for motive attribution. The manifesto doesn’t say he was acting on Democrat lies, and investigators haven’t identified any partisan motive. You’re taking an editorial headline and treating it like a forensic conclusion. If there’s a line in the manifesto that actually supports your claim, quote it. Otherwise, it’s just narrative‑building.

 

[Lionfish]

HotAir is an opinion site, not a source for motive attribution. The manifesto doesn’t say he was acting on Democrat lies, and investigators haven’t identified any partisan motive. You’re taking an editorial headline and treating it like a forensic conclusion. If there’s a line in the manifesto that actually supports your claim, quote it. Otherwise, it’s just narrative‑building.

The image is a democrat holding a sign. It has nothing to do with Hot Air.
WTF is wrong with you?
Never mind. The question was rhetorical.

 

[ziggy]

https://twitter.com/x/status/2048826140253393387

View: https://x.com/i/status/2048826140253393387

 

[volsrocks]

HotAir is an opinion site, not a source for motive attribution. The manifesto doesn’t say he was acting on Democrat lies, and investigators haven’t identified any partisan motive. You’re taking an editorial headline and treating it like a forensic conclusion. If there’s a line in the manifesto that actually supports your claim, quote it. Otherwise, it’s just narrative‑building.

And I am no longer willing to permit a pedophile, rapist, and traitor to coat my hands with his crimes.

Exclusive | Read White House Correspondents’ Dinner suspect Cole Allen’s full anti-Trump manifesto

In the 1,052-word missive obtained by The Post Sunday morning outlined Allen’s “rules of engagement” for the shooting and stated he believed it was his righteous duty to target ad…

nypost.com

SO WHO FILLED HIS HEAD WITH THOSE LIES?

Which fueled this nuts anger

 

[Grim Reaper]

And I am no longer willing to permit a pedophile, rapist, and traitor to coat my hands with his crimes.

Exclusive | Read White House Correspondents’ Dinner suspect Cole Allen’s full anti-Trump manifesto

In the 1,052-word missive obtained by The Post Sunday morning outlined Allen’s “rules of engagement” for the shooting and stated he believed it was his righteous duty to target ad…

nypost.com

SO WHERE DID HE HERE THOSE LIES AT/FROM

The manifesto describes his own personal justifications, not where he supposedly heard anything. If you’re claiming he acted because of specific rhetoric, then quote the line in the manifesto that actually says that. If it’s not in the text, you’re projecting a motive onto him that investigators haven’t identified.

 

[Yakuda]

The manifesto describes his own personal justifications, not where he supposedly heard anything. If you’re claiming he acted because of specific rhetoric, then quote the line in the manifesto that actually says that. If it’s not in the text, you’re projecting a motive onto him that investigators haven’t identified.

He just dreamed it all up in his mind? Youre more retarded than I imagined and believe me I imagined you being severely retarded

 

[Grim Reaper]

He just dreamed it all up in his mind? Youre more retarded than I imagined and believe me I imagined you being severely retarded

Yakuda, it seems like there’s a misunderstanding here. My point is about evidence, if someone claims the manifesto reflects a motive influenced by outside rhetoric, they need to point to text in the manifesto that actually says that. Without that, it’s speculation. Let’s focus on facts instead of personal attacks, it keeps the conversation productive.

 

[tigerred59]

Manifesto Released: He Believed All the Lies the Democrats Now Claim They Never Said​

Manifesto Released: He Believed All the Lies the Democrats Now Claim They Never Said

Analysis of the assassination attempt and the rhetoric fueling political violence in the Democratic Party.

hotair.com

It is and has been the despicable tactic from the left.

Inflammatory rhetoric about President Trump then sit back and wait for some unhinged lunatic to act out and hope he hits

I know Trump gets down on his paws and knees thanking God for the fools that continue to flow with his fakeness.

 

[Grokmaster]

HotAir is an opinion site, not a source for motive attribution. The manifesto doesn’t say he was acting on Democrat lies, and investigators haven’t identified any partisan motive. You’re taking an editorial headline and treating it like a forensic conclusion. If there’s a line in the manifesto that actually supports your claim, quote it. Otherwise, it’s just narrative‑building.

The manifesto says what it says.

The perp is a psychotic demthug, another leftist devoured by his own hatred for America.

 

[Yakuda]

Yakuda, it seems like there’s a misunderstanding here. My point is about evidence, if someone claims the manifesto reflects a motive influenced by outside rhetoric, they need to point to text in the manifesto that actually says that. Without that, it’s speculation. Let’s focus on facts instead of personal attacks, it keeps the conversation productive.

Heres a fact, for four years of that asshole brandons presidency you dipshits said trump posed an "existential threat" to democracy. Id ask you if you know what that means but why bother. The more sad fact is is that this poor fucked up bastard, that went after trump, actually thought you people believed what you said. He clearly believed it and unlike you vermin he took action. Hes more fucked up than you but at least he had the courage of his convictions unlike you weasels.

 

[Nordberg]

And I am no longer willing to permit a pedophile, rapist, and traitor to coat my hands with his crimes.

Exclusive | Read White House Correspondents’ Dinner suspect Cole Allen’s full anti-Trump manifesto

In the 1,052-word missive obtained by The Post Sunday morning outlined Allen’s “rules of engagement” for the shooting and stated he believed it was his righteous duty to target ad…

nypost.com

SO WHO FILLED HIS HEAD WITH THOSE LIES?

Which fueled this nuts anger

Trump did because they are not lies. He was not acting politically nor as a Dem. No Dem told him to do that. Many in the audience were Dems. He was acting to save the great American Experiment from Trump's destruction.

 

[Grim Reaper]

Heres a fact, for four years of that asshole brandons presidency you dipshits said trump posed an "existential threat" to democracy. Id ask you if you know what that means but why bother. The more sad fact is is that this poor fucked up bastard, that went after trump, actually thought you people believed what you said. He clearly believed it and unlike you vermin he took action. Hes more fucked up than you but at least he had the courage of his convictions unlike you weasels.

You’re proving my point for me. I’m talking about evidence in the manifesto. You’re talking about your feelings about politicians. Those aren’t the same thing.

Saying he believed you people isn’t evidence unless you can point to a line in the manifesto that actually says that. If it’s not in the text, it’s speculation.

You can call people names all day, but it doesn’t change the basic standard: If someone claims the shooter acted because of a specific political message, they need to show where the manifesto says that. If they can’t, then it’s just projection dressed up as certainty.

I’m sticking to the facts. You can stick to the insults if you want, but they don’t make your argument any stronger.

 

[Yakuda]

You’re proving my point for me. I’m talking about evidence in the manifesto. You’re talking about your feelings about politicians. Those aren’t the same thing.

Saying he believed you people isn’t evidence unless you can point to a line in the manifesto that actually says that. If it’s not in the text, it’s speculation.

You can call people names all day, but it doesn’t change the basic standard: If someone claims the shooter acted because of a specific political message, they need to show where the manifesto says that. If they can’t, then it’s just projection dressed up as certainty.

I’m sticking to the facts. You can stick to the insults if you want, but they don’t make your argument any stronger.

The manifesto IS the evidence of the hatred you idiots have been spewing for a decade now. The weak minded dimwits who have listened to you morons have been acting out. Ten years and now you want to back away from the hateful rhetoric youve been peddling.

You dont give a flying fuck about facts. Its the lying you people do that bothers me its the pretending you dont lie thats annoying. I have no positive regard for you people.

 

[volsrocks]

Trump did because they are not lies.

pedophile...link to him being convicted and the age must be under 13 to be a pedophile and his sex offender page

rapist... Again link to him being convicted in criminal court of rape

traitor... link to the charges


If u cant than they are LIES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Grim Reaper]

The manifesto IS the evidence of the hatred you idiots have been spewing for a decade now. The weak minded dimwits who have listened to you morons have been acting out. Ten years and now you want to back away from the hateful rhetoric youve been peddling.

You dont give a flying fuck about facts. Its the lying you people do that bothers me its the pretending you dont lie thats annoying. I have no positive regard for you people.

You’re still avoiding the only point that matters. If the manifesto contains the motive you’re claiming, you should be able to quote it. You haven’t, because you can’t.

Saying the manifesto is proof of everything you people did is not evidence. It’s you projecting your conclusions onto a document you won’t actually cite.

Your anger doesn’t change the text. Your insults don’t create facts. And repeating the same accusation in louder language doesn’t make it true.

If there’s a line in the manifesto that supports your claim, produce it. If not, then you’re arguing from emotion, not evidence.

I’m staying with what’s on the page. You’re staying with what you want to believe. That’s the difference.

 

[Grokmaster]

You’re still avoiding the only point that matters. If the manifesto contains the motive you’re claiming, you should be able to quote it. You haven’t, because you can’t.

Saying the manifesto is proof of everything you people did is not evidence. It’s you projecting your conclusions onto a document you won’t actually cite.

Your anger doesn’t change the text. Your insults don’t create facts. And repeating the same accusation in louder language doesn’t make it true.

If there’s a line in the manifesto that supports your claim, produce it. If not, then you’re arguing from emotion, not evidence.

I’m staying with what’s on the page. You’re staying with what you want to believe. That’s the difference.

Your bullshit doesn't cover for the demented, leftist incel, Allen.

 

[Grim Reaper]

Your bullshit doesn't cover for the demented, leftist incel, Allen.

That still doesn’t answer the point. Calling him a leftist incel isn’t evidence of motive, and it doesn’t change what’s actually in the record. If you want to claim political intent, you need something verifiable, not another label.

Right now you’re just repeating an insult and treating it like a fact. That’s not an argument. It’s just noise.

When you have something sourced, bring it. Until then, the text says what it says, and your anger doesn’t rewrite it.

 

[volsrocks]

That still doesn’t answer the point. Calling him a leftist incel isn’t evidence of motive,

Calling Trump a pedophile rapist isn't evidence he is!!

 

[Grokmaster]

You’re still avoiding the only point that matters. If the manifesto contains the motive you’re claiming, you should be able to quote it. You haven’t, because you can’t.

Saying the manifesto is proof of everything you people did is not evidence. It’s you projecting your conclusions onto a document you won’t actually cite.

Your anger doesn’t change the text. Your insults don’t create facts. And repeating the same accusation in louder language doesn’t make it true.

If there’s a line in the manifesto that supports your claim, produce it. If not, then you’re arguing from emotion, not evidence.

I’m staying with what’s on the page. You’re staying with what you want to believe. That’s the difference.

I see that you are incapable of objective research, as are all leftdrones.


Full text of the incel psycho's manifesto available at multiple sources. this is per WEAR... from ABC news:

Read the manifesto in full:​

Hello everybody!

So I may have given a lot of people a surprise today. Let me start off by apologizing to everyone whose trust I abused.

I apologize to my parents for saying I had an interview without specifying it was for “Most Wanted.”

I apologize to my colleagues and students for saying I had a personal emergency (by the time anyone reads this, I probably most certainly DO need to go to the ER, but can hardly call that not a self-inflicted status.)

I apologize to all of the people I traveled next to, all the workers who handled my luggage, and all the other non-targeted people at the hotel who I put in danger simply by being near.

I apologize to everyone who was abused and/or murdered before this, to all those who suffered before I was able to attempt this, to all who may still suffer after, regardless of my success or failure.

I don’t expect forgiveness, but if I could have seen any other way to get this close, I would have taken it. Again, my sincere apologies.

On to why I did any of this:

I am a citizen of the United States of America.

What my representatives do reflects on me.

And I am no longer willing to permit a pedophile, rapist, and traitor to coat my hands with his crimes.

(Well, to be completely honest, I was no longer willing a long time ago, but this is the first real opportunity I’ve had to do something about it.)

While I’m discussing this, I’ll also go over my expected rules of engagement (probably in a terrible format, but I’m not military so too bad.)

I would still go through most everyone here to get to the targets if it were absolutely necessary (on the basis that most people *chose* to attend a speech by a pedophile, rapist, and traitor, and are thus complicit) but I really hope it doesn’t come to that.

Rebuttals to objections:

Objection 1: As a Christian, you should turn the other cheek.

Rebuttal: Turning the other cheek is for when you yourself are oppressed. I’m not the person raped in a detention camp. I’m not the fisherman executed without trial. I’m not a schoolkid blown up or a child starved or a teenage girl abused by the many criminals in this administration.

Turning the other cheek when *someone else* is oppressed is not Christian behavior; it is complicity in the oppressor’s crimes.

Follow the latest on the shooting at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner:

The security loopholes that allowed Cole Allen to get near White House Correspondents’ Dinner — as Trump says this proves need for his ballroom

Objection 2: This is not a convenient time for you to do this.

Rebuttal: I need whoever thinks this way to take a couple minutes and realize that the world isn’t about them. Do you think that when I see someone raped or murdered or abused, I should walk on by because it would be “inconvenient” for people who aren’t the victim?

This was the best timing and chance of success I could come up with.

Objection 3: You didn’t get them all.

Rebuttal: Gotta start somewhere.

Objection 4: As a half-black, half-white person, you shouldn’t be the one doing this.

Rebuttal: I don’t see anyone else picking up the slack

Objection 5: Yield unto Caesar what is Caesar’s.

Rebuttal: The United States of America are ruled by the law, not by any one or several people. In so far as representatives and judges do not follow the law, no one is required to yield them anything so unlawfully ordered.

I would also like to extend my appreciation to a great many people since I will not be likely to be able to talk with them again (unless the Secret Service is *astoundingly* incompetent.)

Thank you to my family, both personal and church, for your love over these 31 years.

Thank you to my friends, for your companionship over many years.

Thank you to my colleagues over many jobs, for your positivity and professionalism.

Thank you to my students for your enthusiasm and love of learning.

Thank you to the many acquaintances I’ve met, in person and online, for short interactions and long-term relationships, for your perspectives and inspiration.

Thank you all for everything.

Sincerely,

Cole “coldForce” “Friendly Federal Assassin” Allen

PS: Ok now that all the sappy stuff is done, what the hell is the Secret Service doing? Sorry, gonna rant a bit here and drop the formal tone.

Like, I expected security cameras at every bend, bugged hotel rooms, armed agents every 10 feet, metal detectors out the wazoo.

What I got (who knows, maybe they’re pranking me!) is nothing.

No damn security. Not in transport. Not in the hotel. Not in the event.

Like, the one thing that I immediately noticed walking into the hotel is the sense of arrogance.

I walk in with multiple weapons and not a single person there considers the possibility that I could be a threat.

The security at the event is all outside, focused on protestors and current arrivals, because apparently no one thought about what happens if someone checks in the day before.

Like, this level of incompetence is insane, and I very sincerely hope it’s corrected by the time this country gets actually competent leadership again.

Like, if I was an Iranian agent, instead of an American citizen, I could have brought a damn Ma Deuce in here and no one would have noticed shit.

Actually insane.

Oh and if anyone is curious is how doing something like feels: it’s awful. I want to throw up; I want to cry for all the things I wanted to do and never will, for all the people whose trust this betrays; I experience rage thinking about everything this administration has done.



~~~~~~~~~~~~

The manifesto of the incel psycho sounds just like all other violent leftists, including many elected democrats.