ExpressLane
Verified User
You want her to decide if the baby lives or dies by herself.You want her to have the baby and support him by herself?
You want her to decide if the baby lives or dies by herself.You want her to have the baby and support him by herself?
It's democracy in action- AND COMMON SENSE IN ACTION.
It is also a lesson ON DEMOCRACY ITSELF- to be learned IN ACTION. IT'S CALLED A VOTING AND VOCAL MAJORITY!
LEARN TO RESPECT IT- Realize when your policies are not on the same side of the people- ALWAYS Align your policies and priorities along with the VOCAL AND VOTING MAJORITY- OR THE CRYING TOWELS AND BUTT-HURT CREAM WILL BE WAITING FOR YOU IN THE BATHROOM ON ELECTION NIGHT!
The nerve of you idiots that want to make abortions illegal think that a Lop-sided Supreme Court led by EXTREME RIGHT WING CHRISTIAN ACTIVISTS can just take away the rights of women- WHEN 90% of Americans agree that women should have the right to choose. Have you ever heard of a BRIDGE-TOO-FAR?
HELLO- Some RED STATES LED BY TRUMPTARDED GOVERNORS have crossed it! YOU TRUMPTARDED RED-STATE TROUBLE-MAKING BASTARDS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
FUCK YOU RIGHT WING CHRISTIAN NATIONALISTS!
EXPECT EXECUTIVE ACTIONS NOW TO PROTECT WOMEN'S RIGHTS- UNTIL CONGRESS CREATES A BILL AND MAKES ABORTIONS LEGAL ACROSS ALL 50 STATES ONCE-AND-FOR-ALL!
The minority party- DOES NOT RULE OVER THE MAJORITY OF THE PEOPLE! NOT FOR LONG!
THAT IS NOT DEMOCRACY AND THE CITIZENS WILL CORRECT THE PROBLEM THE NEXT TIME THEY GET A CHANCE TO VOTE!
DUH! COMMON SENSE!
![]()
And??"British researchers analyzed scans of the hearts of healthy fetuses in the womb and found that the heart has four clearly defined chambers in the eighth week of pregnancy, but does not have fully organized muscle tissue until the 20th week."
Fetal Heart May Develop Later in Pregnancy Than Thought
It appears the anti-choice people do, because they call a spasming piece of tissue a heart.
Ah, a religious right, superstitious circle-jerk. Don't get any on the rest of us, you woman-hating pigs.
Its a distinct human being from conception. People that say otherwise are anti-science. Abortion kills the life of a distinct human being.its always an unborn child until the moment it is born.......did you mean to ask me when it becomes a child?.......the moment it has DNA that distinguishes it from the mother and the father......you know, the point it becomes an individual living human being.......
Ah, yes.
![]()
You still haven’t addressed exactly when that is.Quote Originally Posted by PostmodernProphet View Post
its always an unborn child until the moment it is born.......did you mean to ask me when it becomes a child?.......the moment it has DNA that distinguishes it from the mother and the father......you know, the point it becomes an individual living human being.......
sorry, cunt.....biology is not a right wing religion.....get your head out of your ass......
why is it you repeatedly trip over your own tongue......
Science disagrees with you. And if it isn't alive directing the production of its own proteins and hormones exactly why is it necessary to kill it? If it isn't alive it isn't going to grow.Over and over you keep using the term "unborn".
UNborn = NOT BORN = NOT YET ALIVE.
Then he is far ahead of you.Translation: You are unable to keep up with anyone who's IQ exceeds 60.
You can barely spell, "biology". Please don't try to tell us you know anything about it, loser.
Translation: You are unable to keep up with anyone who's IQ exceeds 60.
Good they will be unaffected by the recent SCOTUS ruling.Exactly. The vast majority of PP clinics do NOT do abortions. They do STD testing, cancer screening, education, they provide treatment for disease, and contraceptives for pregnancy prevention. But because they've been vilified by Reichwing politicians and media for so long, idiots like Toxic TOP think they're evil, as you said. She's lying about "working with" them, btw, but you knew that.
What is the difference between a woman who miscarries and loses her baby at two months and the women who purposefully terminates her baby's life at two months? Both are unborn babies whose life process has begun...and ended... When do you think life "begins"? Such a wonderful "mystery" to discuss, with many differing views....all with their own "merits"...So... What's wrong with supporting a goal to drastically reduce the number of terminations at any stage of life...unless there's medical necessity....Abortion should not be used as birth control...Nothing wrong with supporting that belief, either...is there? Common sense says that if a baby is not wanted don't create one...then it won't be necessary to end one...Of course, I’m not asking in reference to miscarriages. The topic is abortions. I’m also not asking about the pro-choice stance. I’m asking about the pro-life viewpoint.
When does that life actually begin? That seems to be the crux of the matter, regardless of whether it’s rape, incest or any other cause of pregnancy.
lol....and yet I've made you look like a moron every time you post...
I take that back......I really don't deserve the credit for that.......YOU make you look like a moron every time you post.....
What is the difference between a woman who miscarries and loses her baby at two months and the women who purposefully terminates her baby's life at two months? Both are unborn babies whose life process has begun...and ended... When do you think life "begins"? Such a wonderful "mystery" to discuss, with many differing views....all with their own "merits"...So... What's wrong with supporting a goal to drastically reduce the number of terminations at any stage of life...unless there's medical necessity....Abortion should not be used as birth control...Nothing wrong with supporting that belief, either...is there? Common sense says that if a baby is not wanted don't create one...then it won't be necessary to end one...
what part of what you quoted are you too simple minded to understand?.....