Apparently the same standard is not applied to good old Joe!
Why isn't it a 'lie' when Joe Biden says something false or dishonest?
It’s not unusual for acquaintances to ask me if what they just heard on the news or read online is true. Did such-and-such really happen? Did so-and-so really say what they heard attributed to him on the news? These people aren’t paranoid. Unfortunately, they’re asking legitimate questions. Many journalists, for a while now, haven’t been shy about revealing their biases. So who knows if what my friends just heard on TV or read in a news story is really true?
I’ve been a full-time working journalist since the late 1960s — and even I don’t know what to believe anymore.
<snip>
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-h...n-joe-biden-says-something-false-or-dishonest
You snarked about using WaPo and then you posted an opinion piece by a conservative and somehow that's different?
Apparently there's people on The Hill who aren't trash reporters.
You snarked about using WaPo and then you posted an opinion piece by a conservative and somehow that's different?
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED BY CONTRIBUTORS ARE THEIR OWN AND NOT THE VIEW OF THE HILL
Bernard Goldberg is an Emmy and an Alfred I. duPont-Columbia University award-winning writer and journalist. He previously worked as a reporter for CBS News...
![]()
Goldberg has since accepted the label of "conservative," saying in 2020, "I see myself as a conservative with live and let live principles… a conservative libertarian I guess. Now, even when I agree with liberals on this issue or that, I no longer want to be on their team. I not only don’t accept their new left wing politics, it’s also their holier than thou elitism that annoys me. I no longer see myself as a liberal. They left me, not the other way around. Now, I’m a conservative. Not a right-wing nut, just a conservative with libertarian tendencies."
Bernie is still "on The Hill". Thehill.com
![]()
Though frequently described as a conservative, Goldberg previously rejected the label, describing himself as a life-long liberal modeled after the 1960s ideals of the U.S. Democratic Party. In a February 22, 2012 interview, Goldberg said: "The reason (people claim I'm conservative) is so I'll be automatically marginalized. I wrote in 'Bias' that I would make racial discrimination a criminal offense, not just a civil offense. On gay rights, I don’t know anyone more Libertarian than me. I don’t want the government getting involved in it. I’m pro-abortion with reservations. I’ve never set foot in a country club in my life. I consider myself to be an old-fashioned liberal. I’m a liberal the way liberals used to be when they were like John F. Kennedy and when they were like Hubert Humphrey, when they were upbeat and enthusiastic and mainstream. I am not a liberal the way liberals are today, at least as exemplified by Al Franken and Michael Moore, where they’re angry, nasty, closed minded, and not mainstream, but fringe. I think this is what really irks the media (about me). That this is coming from one of them. I was one of them for 28 years."
![]()
As a contributor, not an employee.
Yes, that paragraph preceded the one where "Goldberg has since accepted the label of "conservative."
So? His writing is still on "The Hill".![]()
My point to Tom is about what Goldberg writes, not who he writes for.
It wasn't relevant.
Yet you went to great pains to state that he's not a employee of The Hill even though nobody said he was.
![]()
You snarked about using WaPo and then you posted an opinion piece by a conservative and somehow that's different?