james comey 8647 seashell post

What our resident pointy hooded palooka and friends can't deal with (least they lose those troll checks).


Taichiliberal

Post in thread 'james comey 8647 seashell post'

The GOP wasted the taxpayer's money for years trying to get the votes to repeal the ACA and only achieved partial repeal via voting down re-enactment of enhanced subsidies.

The GOP wasted the taxpayer's money trying to impeach Bill Clinton, only to get an article of impeachment with Clinton leaving office with a favorable approval rating.

The GOP wasted the taxpayer's money for4 years trying to make Obama "a one term President instead of properly governing.

So going after Comey AGAIN is just another futile effort to distract from the disasters of depriving people of healthcare, killing...
  • Like
  • Haha
 
volsrocks said:
86 Nordberg


So how do u read that?
Click to expand...
Do you think I am worried about you killing me? Nope. Should I call the cops? You will be ignored because it is a meaningless threat. Comey was not threatening Trump. Can you understand that, can't you? Like most people, we know 86 is what a bouncer does to a rowdy customer. They push them out the door. They do not kill them.
 
Nordberg said:
Do you think I am worried about you killing me? Nope. Should I call the cops? You will be ignored because it is a meaningless threat. Comey was not threatening Trump. Can you understand that, can't you? Like most people, we know 86 is what a bouncer does to a rowdy customer. They push them out the door. They do not kill them.
Click to expand...
He understands....he's just another insipidly stubborn sheet wearing schmuck who will talk all types of nonsense to justify/excuse Jan. 6th or when people Cheeto Jeezus vilifies get doxxed or threatened or attacked by his acolytes.

But the mid-terms and 2028 are coming for them, and they are sweating!
 
Lionfish said:
Nothing will come of this, but it is an example of why Bondi was fired.
Since she has been gone,
Homan has been turned loose.
Omar is on the hot seat like never before,
On the night of Tampon Tims State of the State speech, Patel raided a dozen more fake hospice, daycare, and senior housing empty buildings that have been collecting millions in taxpayer dollars.
Comey gets the spotlight.
Faucci should be the next.
Buckle up. Lot's more coming.


Blanche has done more in two weeks than Bondi did in a year.
Click to expand...

The Democrats' criminal syndicate hates this; it means less money in their pockets and more money for those people it is intended to help. Their base is enraged no end. They're absolutely frothing at the mouth here.
 
Grim Reaper said:
Based on publicly available reporting, 8647 has been treated as a possible threat by authorities, but whether it legally qualifies as a death threat depends on proving intent — something legal experts say is difficult.


What the sources actually say​

Multiple outlets reported that former FBI Director James Comey was indicted after posting an image of seashells arranged as “8647,” which prosecutors interpreted as a threat toward President Trump.

Why the number matters:

  • “86” is slang for get rid of or throw out, and in some modern usage can imply kill, though dictionaries note this meaning is not widely established.
  • “47” refers to Trump as the 47th president.
This combination led Trump allies and federal prosecutors to argue it was a coded call to harm the president.

But is it​

Legal experts cited in reporting say the case faces major First Amendment hurdles because:

  • Prosecutors must prove the message was a “true threat” under 18 U.S.C. § 871.
  • They must also prove intent, not just interpretation.
  • A symbolic or ambiguous image — like seashells forming numbers — is generally protected speech unless paired with clear intent.
One constitutional law professor said the image alone would be unlikely to survive a First Amendment challenge.

How authorities responded​

Despite the legal ambiguity, the Secret Service and DHS treated the post as a potential threat and opened an investigation.

Comey later said he did not realize the numbers could be interpreted as violent and deleted the post.


Bottom line​

“8647” can be interpreted as a threat, and authorities have acted on that interpretation — but whether it is a death threat in the legal sense depends entirely on proving intent, which experts say is very difficult.
Click to expand...
its always a bad idea to threaten a president.

Comey should be arrested for stupidity if nothing else.
 
Some legal analysts say the case appears weak and could face dismissal.
Others say it’s too early to tell and depends on motions and evidence.
Online forums exaggerate this into it will be thrown out, which is speculation.
 
Ichabod Stain said:
he clearly incited violence against a sitting president.
Click to expand...
You jumping straight to he clearly incited violence is exactly why nobody takes your legal takes seriously.

I laid out what actual analysts are saying, mixed assessments, procedural uncertainty, and the fact that online forums keep turning might into guaranteed.

You responded with the intellectual equivalent of pounding the table and yelling because I said so.

If you’ve got something beyond vibes and wish‑casting, great. If not, you’re just proving my point about how fast this place turns speculation into gospel.
 
Grim Reaper said:
You jumping straight to he clearly incited violence is exactly why nobody takes your legal takes seriously.

I laid out what actual analysts are saying, mixed assessments, procedural uncertainty, and the fact that online forums keep turning might into guaranteed.

You responded with the intellectual equivalent of pounding the table and yelling because I said so.

If you’ve got something beyond vibes and wish‑casting, great. If not, you’re just proving my point about how fast this place turns speculation into gospel.
Click to expand...
the DOJ agrees with me

the legal system is taking my take seriously.

your take is off, malignant buttfucker.

:truestory:
 
Ichabod Stain said:
the DOJ agrees with me

the legal system is taking my take seriously.

your take is off, malignant buttfucker.

:truestory:
Click to expand...
The DOJ agrees with me is not the flex you think it is. Agencies don’t validate your forum hot‑takes just because you’re emotionally invested in them.

I cited what analysts are actually saying mixed assessments, procedural uncertainty, and the fact that people here keep turning possibilities into certainties.

Your entire rebuttal was to declare yourself correct by proclamation and then melt down when that didn’t land.

If you’ve got an argument rooted in something other than your own confidence, bring it. If all you’ve got is chest‑thumping and projection, you’re just proving my point about how fast this place trades facts for feelings.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top