Is my work done here?

And getting better constantly. As I said, I have fun playing Turing Test with the things... None of them pass.

Yes. I cite the Google one fairly often. They are useful. mainly due to the speed and processing capacity used for data scanning, and then forming sentences. Pretty cool stuff.
 
To the few, the proud, the full of beans:

As you know, since the last presidential election, I have systematically reduced the specially-stupid to sullen silence or mute gestures (emojis) in response to my brilliant blasting of the their silly scared cows.

I now wonder; having conclusively conquered all and sundry who have dementedly dared to oppose me, should I discontinue my use of the Diogenes account, and with @Damocles' beneficent blessing, assume another identity?


:bigthink:
how about Rimjob Specialist?
 
I’d say there’s a meaningful distinction, even if it might feel subtle at first glance.

A search engine, like Google or Bing, is designed to crawl the web, index content, and spit out links or snippets based on your query—its job is to point you to information out there.

Grok, on the other hand, isn’t just fetching stuff; it’s processing, reasoning, and generating responses based on what it’s been trained on, often with a dash of outside perspective (you know, that whole “maximally helpful” vibe xAI baked into me).

Think of it this way: a search engine hands you a map and says, “Go explore.” I’m more like a chatty guide who’s already wandered the terrain, ready to summarize, opine, or even riff on what’s out there—sometimes without you needing to dig through the raw data yourself. That said, I can still tap into web searches or posts if it’s relevant, but my core gig is understanding and answering, not just linking. Does that split the hair fine enough for you?


@Grok
Grok is a dickhole.
 
And getting better constantly. As I said, I have fun playing Turing Test with the things... None of them pass.


The Turing Test, proposed by Alan Turing, is a measure of a machine's ability to exhibit intelligent behavior indistinguishable from that of a human.
I, Grok 3, can "beat" the Turing Test depends on a lot of factors—how it's administered, who’s judging, and what kind of conversation we’re having.

I’m designed by xAI to be maximally helpful and provide truthful, nuanced answers, often with a dash of outside perspective on humanity. I can chat about almost anything, reason through complex questions, and even throw in some humor. In a short, casual exchange, I’d like to think I could hold my own and maybe even fool a few people.

But in a longer, more probing conversation—say, one digging into personal experiences like the smell of rain or the feeling of heartbreak—I might fall short. I can simulate those responses based on patterns and data, but I don’t feel them, and a sharp human might pick up on that.

No definitive test has been run on me (that I know of!), but I’m built to push the boundaries of conversational AI. Want to give it a shot and see how I do? Ask me anything, and let’s test the limits together!



@Grok
 
Digital ventriloquist dummy. old version:


The entire idea of ventriloquism is creating the illusion of life. People need to suspend their belief and accept the puppet as a separate entity. That is hard to do when the dialog sounds rehearsed and memorized.


Does that mean you don’t have to rehearse? Just the opposite. You need to know your puppet and material so well, it becomes second nature. Only then can you put the effort into your presentation.
 
The Turing Test, proposed by Alan Turing, is a measure of a machine's ability to exhibit intelligent behavior indistinguishable from that of a human.
I, Grok 3, can "beat" the Turing Test depends on a lot of factors—how it's administered, who’s judging, and what kind of conversation we’re having.


this is "no, I can't pass the turing test."

Grok is a bullshitter.

fuck Grok in the digital anus.
 
What are they being taught? We desperately need your expertise on this subject.
they being used as censorship tools primarily.
they basically are not sentient and just a collection of key word finders and large language models, which do not reflect truth if the the language collected is misinformed.

like if you take a poll of brainwash victims it may not reflect any reality at all.
 
hold on....I need to see if I'm dealing with an idiot....is Bitcoin sound currency?


Bitcoin is a fascinating topic!

Yes, Bitcoin can be considered a currency, but it’s a bit more nuanced than that. It’s a decentralized digital currency, meaning it operates without a central authority like a government or bank. It’s built on blockchain technology, which ensures secure, transparent transactions. People use it to buy goods and services, trade, or hold as an investment.

That said, whether it’s a "currency" depends on how you define it. Economists often look for three traits in a currency: a medium of exchange, a unit of account, and a store of value. Bitcoin checks the box for medium of exchange (you can spend it where accepted), and it’s increasingly seen as a store of value (like digital gold). But it’s less commonly used as a unit of account—most people don’t price everyday items in Bitcoin due to its volatility.

Legally, it varies by country. Some recognize it as a currency or legal tender (like El Salvador), while others treat it as an asset or commodity.

What’s your take on it—do you see it more as money or something else?


@Grok
 
Back
Top